Literature DB >> 15189090

Effect of probe pressure on cervical fluorescence spectroscopy measurements.

Audrey Nath1, Kelley Rivoire, Sung Chang, Dennis Cox, E Neely Atkinson, Michele Follen, Rebecca Richards-Kortum.   

Abstract

Fluorescence spectroscopy is a promising technology for detection of epithelial precancers and cancers. While age and menopausal status influence measurements in the cervix, other variables do not significantly affect the diagnosis. In this study we examine probe pressure as a variable. A fiber optic probe to measure fluorescence spectra at different calibrated levels of pressure was designed and tested. A pilot study was conducted measuring fluorescence excitation emission matrices in 20 patients at light, medium, and firm pressure. Spectroscopic data were pre-processed and analyzed to compare mean peak intensities as a function of pressure. Further statistical analyses tested for differences in intensities at each excitation/emission wavelength pair. Four providers made measurements from 41 sites; 33 yielded good quality spectroscopic data (22 squamous normal, 7 squamous abnormal, 3 columnar normal, 1 transformation zone) from 17 of 20 patients. At all pressure levels, abnormal tissue showed less fluorescence intensity than normal tissue, and post-menopausal patients showed higher fluorescence intensity than premenopausal patients, consistent with previous analyses. A permutation analysis suggests that pressure does not significantly affect fluorescence intensity or lineshape. While other studies are needed to confirm these findings, this study suggests that fluorescence spectroscopy is a robust technology likely not influenced by fiber optic probe pressure. (c) 2004 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15189090     DOI: 10.1117/1.1695562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  18 in total

1.  Properties of contact pressure induced by manually operated fiber-optic probes.

Authors:  Maksimilijan Bregar; Blaž Cugmas; Peter Naglic; Daniela Hartmann; Franjo Pernuš; Boštjan Likar; Miran Bürmen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Method of detecting tissue contact for fiber-optic probes to automate data acquisition without hardware modification.

Authors:  Sarah Ruderman; Scott Mueller; Andrew Gomes; Jeremy Rogers; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Probe pressure effects on human skin diffuse reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy measurements.

Authors:  Liang Lim; Brandon Nichols; Narasimhan Rajaram; James W Tunnell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Optical technologies and molecular imaging for cervical neoplasia: a program project update.

Authors:  Timon P H Buys; Scott B Cantor; Martial Guillaud; Karen Adler-Storthz; Dennis D Cox; Clement Okolo; Oyedunni Arulogon; Oladimeji Oladepo; Karen Basen-Engquist; Eileen Shinn; José-Miguel Yamal; J Robert Beck; Michael E Scheurer; Dirk van Niekerk; Anais Malpica; Jasenka Matisic; Gregg Staerkel; Edward Neely Atkinson; Luc Bidaut; Pierre Lane; J Lou Benedet; Dianne Miller; Tom Ehlen; Roderick Price; Isaac F Adewole; Calum MacAulay; Michele Follen
Journal:  Gend Med       Date:  2011-09-22

5.  Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of epithelial tissue with a smart fiber-optic probe.

Authors:  Bing Yu; Amy Shah; Vivek K Nagarajan; Daron G Ferris
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  The Effect of Probe Pressure on In Vivo Single Fiber Reflectance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sanaz Hariri Tabrizi; Ali Akbar Shakibaei
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-27

7.  Accuracy of optical spectroscopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Testing a device as an adjunct to colposcopy.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Martial Guillaud; Dennis D Cox; E Neely Atkinson; John L Benedet; Dianne Miller; Thomas Ehlen; Jasenka Matisic; Dirk van Niekerk; Monique Bertrand; Andrea Milbourne; Helen Rhodes; Anais Malpica; Gregg Staerkel; Shahla Nader-Eftekhari; Karen Adler-Storthz; Michael E Scheurer; Karen Basen-Engquist; Eileen Shinn; Loyd A West; Anne-Therese Vlastos; Xia Tao; J Robert Beck; Calum Macaulay; Michele Follen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Early detection and differentiation of venous and arterial occlusion in skin flaps using visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and autofluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  Caigang Zhu; Shuo Chen; Christopher Hoe-Kong Chui; Bien-Keem Tan; Quan Liu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 9.  Advances in quantitative UV-visible spectroscopy for clinical and pre-clinical application in cancer.

Authors:  J Quincy Brown; Karthik Vishwanath; Gregory M Palmer; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 9.740

10.  Detection of cervical lesions by multivariate analysis of diffuse reflectance spectra: a clinical study.

Authors:  Vasumathi Gopala Prabitha; Sambasivan Suchetha; Jayaraj Lalitha Jayanthi; Kamalasanan Vijayakumary Baiju; Prabhakaran Rema; Koyippurath Anuraj; Anita Mathews; Paul Sebastian; Narayanan Subhash
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.