Literature DB >> 24150759

Functional outcome in subretinal electronic implants depends on foveal eccentricity.

Katarina Stingl1, Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Florian Gekeler, Akos Kusnyerik, Helmut Sachs, Eberhart Zrenner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An active microelectronic subretinal implant, developed to replace the photoreceptive function in hereditary degenerations of the outer retina, has been applied in a pilot and clinical study in patients with end-stage retinal degeneration.
METHODS: The study population comprised 20 blind patients, all of whom lost vision as result of a hereditary retinal disease. An active visual implant was placed surgically within the subretinal space of each patient: subfoveal placement in eight patients (group 1) and parafoveal placement in 12 (group 2). Standardized low-vision tests, including light perception, light localization, movement detection, grating acuity, and visual acuity by Landolt C-rings, were used under masked, randomized implant-OFF and implant-ON conditions. For the chip-mediated vision functional results of both subject groups were compared.
RESULTS: Three of 20 patients were excluded from analysis because of surgical or technical implant issues. Among patients with nonfoveal placement of the implant, 80% could perceive light, 10% recognized location, and 10% correctly distinguished stripe patterns up to a resolution of 0.33 cycles/degree. No nonfoveal placement patient passed the motion or Landolt C-ring tests. When the implant was placed subfoveally, 100% of patients could perceive light and determine light localization, 75% could resolve motion up to 35°/s, 88% correctly distinguished stripe patterns up to a resolution of 3.3 cycles/degree, and 38% passed a Landolt C-ring test with a decimal visual acuity of up to 20/546 (logMAR 1.43).
CONCLUSIONS: Subfoveal placement of active subretinal visual implants allows superior measurable outcomes compared to para- or nonfoveal placement locations. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01024803, NCT00515814.).

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial vision; neuroprosthetics; retinitis pigmentosa; subretinal visual implant

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24150759     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  26 in total

1.  Contrast Sensitivity With a Subretinal Prosthesis and Implications for Efficient Delivery of Visual Information.

Authors:  Georges Goetz; Richard Smith; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Alexander Sher; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Activation of ganglion cells and axon bundles using epiretinal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Lauren E Grosberg; Karthik Ganesan; Georges A Goetz; Sasidhar S Madugula; Nandita Bhaskhar; Victoria Fan; Peter Li; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; Subhasish Mitra; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Photochemical approaches to vision restoration.

Authors:  Russell N Van Gelder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of retinal response to network-mediated photovoltaic stimulation.

Authors:  Elton Ho; Richard Smith; Georges Goetz; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore I Kamins; James Harris; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker; Alexander Sher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Restoring vision at the fovea.

Authors:  Juliette E McGregor
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-08

6.  Active confocal imaging for visual prostheses.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Jung; Doron Aloni; Yitzhak Yitzhaky; Eli Peli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Inner and outer retinal changes in retinal degenerations associated with ABCA4 mutations.

Authors:  Wei Chieh Huang; Artur V Cideciyan; Alejandro J Roman; Alexander Sumaroka; Rebecca Sheplock; Sharon B Schwartz; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Photovoltaic Restoration of Central Vision in Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Daniel Palanker; Yannick Le Mer; Saddek Mohand-Said; Mahiul Muqit; Jose A Sahel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.

Authors:  G A Goetz; D V Palanker
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2016-08-09

Review 10.  [Visual prostheses].

Authors:  P Walter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.