Literature DB >> 33683403

Does sonification of action simulation training impact corticospinal excitability and audiomotor plasticity?

Fabio Castro1,2, Ladan Osman3, Giovanni Di Pino4, Aleksandra Vuckovic5, Alexander Nowicky6, Daniel Bishop7.   

Abstract

Sonification is a sensory augmentation strategy whereby a sound is associated with, and modulated by, movement. Evidence suggests that sonification could be a viable strategy to maximize learning and rehabilitation. Recent studies investigated sonification of action observation, reporting beneficial effects, especially in Parkinson's disease. However, research on simulation training-a training regime based on action observation and motor imagery, in which actions are internally simulated, without physical execution-suggest that action observation alone is suboptimal, compared to the combined use of action observation and motor imagery. In this study, we explored the effects of sonified action observation and motor imagery on corticospinal excitability, as well as to evaluate the extent of practice-dependent plasticity induced by this training. Nineteen participants were recruited to complete a practice session based on combined and congruent action observation and motor imagery (AOMI) and physical imitation of the same action. Prior to the beginning, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups, one group (nine participants) completed the practice block with sonified AOMI, while the other group (ten participants) completed the practice without extrinsic auditory information and served as control group. To investigate practice-induced plasticity, participants completed two auditory paired associative stimulation (aPAS) protocols, one completed after the practice block, and another one completed alone, without additional interventions, at least 7 days before the practice. After the practice block, both groups significantly increased their corticospinal excitability, but sonification did not exert additional benefits, compared to non-sonified conditions. In addition, aPAS significantly increased corticospinal excitability when completed alone, but when it was primed by a practice block, no modulatory effects on corticospinal excitability were found. It is possible that sonification of combined action observation and motor imagery may not be a useful strategy to improve corticospinal, but further studies are needed to explore its relationship with performance improvements. We also confirm the neuromodulatory effect of aPAS, but its interaction with audiomotor practice remain unclear.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metaplasticity; Paired associative stimulation; Plasticity; Sensory augmentation; Sonification; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33683403     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06069-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  90 in total

1.  Reliability of the input-output properties of the cortico-spinal pathway obtained from transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  T J Carroll; S Riek; R G Carson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  A network for audio-motor coordination in skilled pianists and non-musicians.

Authors:  Simon Baumann; Susan Koeneke; Conny F Schmidt; Martin Meyer; Kai Lutz; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule.

Authors:  Natalia Caporale; Yang Dan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Differential cortical activation during observation and observation-and-imagination.

Authors:  H I Berends; R Wolkorte; M J Ijzerman; M J A M van Putten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Archy O de Berker; James Bonaiuto
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Intrahemispheric cortico-cortical connections of the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Leila Cammoun; Jean Philippe Thiran; Alessandra Griffa; Reto Meuli; Patric Hagmann; Stephanie Clarke
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  Neurophysiological markers discriminate different forms of motor imagery during action observation.

Authors:  Adam M Bruton; Paul S Holmes; Daniel L Eaves; Zoë C Franklin; David J Wright
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Motor imagery combined with action observation training optimized for individual motor skills further improves motor skills close to a plateau.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Aoyama; Fuminari Kaneko; Yutaka Kohno
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Motor cortical plasticity induced by motor learning through mental practice.

Authors:  Laura Avanzino; Nicolas Gueugneau; Ambra Bisio; Piero Ruggeri; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Marco Bove
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Training the motor cortex by observing the actions of others during immobilization.

Authors:  Michela Bassolino; Martina Campanella; Marco Bove; Thierry Pozzo; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.