Literature DB >> 1584250

Comparison of electric and magnetic coil stimulation in the supraclavicular region.

D Cros1, S Gominak, B Shahani, J Fang, B Day.   

Abstract

We compared the compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) evoked in the biceps, triceps, and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles by conventional electrical stimulation at Erb's point (EP), and by magnetic coil stimulation of the supraclavicular region in 11 normal subjects. We found that magnetic coil stimulation was less effective than conventional stimulation in activating motor fibers in the brachial plexus in 45% of the recordings analyzed. CMAP amplitudes greater than those obtained with EP electrical stimulation were seen in 16% of recordings with supraclavicular magnetic stimulation, and in 33% of recordings with cervical magnetic stimulation, indicating that EP electrical stimulation is submaximal in a large proportion of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1584250     DOI: 10.1002/mus.880150509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  2 in total

1.  Magnetic versus electrical stimulation in the interpolation twitch technique of elbow flexors.

Authors:  Sofia I Lampropoulou; Alexander V Nowicky; Louise Marston
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Piezoelectric Signals in Vascularized Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Delfo D'Alessandro; Claudio Ricci; Mario Milazzo; Giovanna Strangis; Francesca Forli; Gabriele Buda; Mario Petrini; Stefano Berrettini; Mohammed Jasim Uddin; Serena Danti; Paolo Parchi
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-11-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.