Literature DB >> 24149730

Reliability and Validity of a New Test of Change-of-Direction Speed for Field-Based Sports: the Change-of-Direction and Acceleration Test (CODAT).

Robert G Lockie1, Adrian B Schultz, Samuel J Callaghan, Matthew D Jeffriess, Simon P Berry.   

Abstract

Field sport coaches must use reliable and valid tests to assess change-of-direction speed in their athletes. Few tests feature linear sprinting with acute change- of-direction maneuvers. The Change-of-Direction and Acceleration Test (CODAT) was designed to assess field sport change-of-direction speed, and includes a linear 5-meter (m) sprint, 45° and 90° cuts, 3- m sprints to the left and right, and a linear 10-m sprint. This study analyzed the reliability and validity of this test, through comparisons to 20-m sprint (0-5, 0-10, 0-20 m intervals) and Illinois agility run (IAR) performance. Eighteen Australian footballers (age = 23.83 ± 7.04 yrs; height = 1.79 ± 0.06 m; mass = 85.36 ± 13.21 kg) were recruited. Following familiarization, subjects completed the 20-m sprint, CODAT, and IAR in 2 sessions, 48 hours apart. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed relative reliability. Absolute reliability was analyzed through paired samples t-tests (p ≤ 0.05) determining between-session differences. Typical error (TE), coefficient of variation (CV), and differences between the TE and smallest worthwhile change (SWC), also assessed absolute reliability and test usefulness. For the validity analysis, Pearson's correlations (p ≤ 0.05) analyzed between-test relationships. Results showed no between-session differences for any test (p = 0.19-0.86). CODAT time averaged ~6 s, and the ICC and CV equaled 0.84 and 3.0%, respectively. The homogeneous sample of Australian footballers meant that the CODAT's TE (0.19 s) exceeded the usual 0.2 x standard deviation (SD) SWC (0.10 s). However, the CODAT is capable of detecting moderate performance changes (SWC calculated as 0.5 x SD = 0.25 s). There was a near perfect correlation between the CODAT and IAR (r = 0.92), and very large correlations with the 20-m sprint (r = 0.75-0.76), suggesting that the CODAT was a valid change-of-direction speed test. Due to movement specificity, the CODAT has value for field sport assessment. Key pointsThe change-of-direction and acceleration test (CODAT) was designed specifically for field sport athletes from specific speed research, and data derived from time-motion analyses of sports such as rugby union, soccer, and Australian football. The CODAT features a linear 5-meter (m) sprint, 45° and 90° cuts and 3-m sprints to the left and right, and a linear 10-m sprint.The CODAT was found to be a reliable change-of-direction speed assessment when considering intra-class correlations between two testing sessions, and the coefficient of variation between trials. A homogeneous sample of Australian footballers resulted in absolute reliability limitations when considering differences between the typical error and smallest worthwhile change. However, the CODAT will detect moderate (0.5 times the test's standard deviation) changes in performance.The CODAT correlated with the Illinois agility run, highlighting that it does assess change-of-direction speed. There were also significant relationships with short sprint performance (i.e. 0-5 m and 0-10 m), demonstrating that linear acceleration is assessed within the CODAT, without the extended duration and therefore metabolic limitations of the IAR. Indeed, the average duration of the test (~6 seconds) is field sport-specific. Therefore, the CODAT could be used as an assessment of change-of-direction speed in field sport athletes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Illinois agility run; Lateral cutting; field testing; linear speed; team sports

Year:  2013        PMID: 24149730      PMCID: PMC3761765     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  44 in total

1.  Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.

Authors:  W G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Physical fitness qualities of professional rugby league football players: determination of positional differences.

Authors:  R Meir; R Newton; E Curtis; M Fardell; B Butler
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Specificity of acceleration, maximum speed, and agility in professional soccer players.

Authors:  Thomas Little; Alun G Williams
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Player movement patterns and game activities in the Australian Football League.

Authors:  B Dawson; R Hopkinson; B Appleby; G Stewart; C Roberts
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.319

5.  Positional characteristics of physical performance in Division I college female soccer players.

Authors:  J D Vescovi; T D Brown; T M Murray
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to sprint speed and change of direction speed.

Authors:  J M Sheppard; W B Young; T L A Doyle; T A Sheppard; R U Newton
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 4.319

7.  Physiological and performance test correlates of prolonged, high-intensity, intermittent running performance in moderately trained women team sport athletes.

Authors:  Anita C Sirotic; Aaron J Coutts
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Interrelationships between measured running intensities and agility performance in subelite rugby union players.

Authors:  Stuart Jarvis; Lee O Sullivan; Bruce Davies; Huw Wiltshire; Julien S Baker
Journal:  Res Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.674

9.  Reliability and factorial validity of agility tests for soccer players.

Authors:  Goran Sporis; Igor Jukic; Luka Milanovic; Vlatko Vucetic
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Relative and absolute reliability of a modified agility T-test and its relationship with vertical jump and straight sprint.

Authors:  Radhouane Haj Sassi; Wajdi Dardouri; Mohamed Haj Yahmed; Nabil Gmada; Mohamed Elhedi Mahfoudhi; Zied Gharbi
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  32 in total

1.  Relationship of body mass status with running and jumping performances in young basketball players.

Authors:  Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Abbas Asadi; Eduardo J A M Santos; Julio Calleja-González; Johnny Padulo; Hamdi Chtourou; Erika Zemkova
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-10-20

2.  Return to sports after ACL reconstruction: a new functional test protocol.

Authors:  Gian Nicola Bisciotti; Alessandro Quaglia; Andrea Belli; Giulia Carimati; Piero Volpi
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-02-12

3.  Reliability, Validity and Usefulness of a New Response Time Test for Agility-Based Sports: A Simple vs. Complex Motor Task.

Authors:  Haris Pojskic; Jeffrey Pagaduan; Edin Uzicanin; Vlatko Separovic; Miodrag Spasic; Nikola Foretic; Damir Sekulic
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  The Reliability and Validity of a Novel Sport-Specific Balance Test to Differentiate Performance Levels in Elite Curling Players.

Authors:  Haris Pojskic; Kerry McGawley; Anna Gustafsson; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Reliability and Validity of the Inline Skating Skill Test.

Authors:  Ivan Radman; Lana Ruzic; Viktoria Padovan; Vjekoslav Cigrovski; Hrvoje Podnar
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Reactive-Agility in Touch Plays an Important Role in Elite Playing Level: Reliability and Validity of a Newly Developed Repeated Up-and-Down Agility Test.

Authors:  Chi-Ching Gary Chow; Yu-Hin Kong; Chi-Ling Wong
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.017

7.  The Bigger They Are: Relationships between Body Height and Mass with the Body Drag Task in Law Enforcement Recruits.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; J Jay Dawes; Robin M Orr; Joseph M Dulla
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-04-01

8.  A NOVEL TEST TO ASSESS CHANGE OF DIRECTION: DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND REHABILITATION CONSIDERATIONS.

Authors:  Haley Worst; Nancy Henderson; Ryan Decarreau; George Davies
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-04

9.  Validity and reliability of new agility test among elite and subelite under 14-soccer players.

Authors:  Younés Hachana; Helmi Chaabène; Ghada Ben Rajeb; Riadh Khlifa; Ridha Aouadi; Karim Chamari; Tim J Gabbett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Functional Test for Agility Performance is a Reliable Quick Decision-Making Test for Skilled Water Polo Players.

Authors:  Guilherme Tucher; Flávio Antônio de Souza Castro; António José Rocha Martins da Silva; Nuno Domingos Garrido
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.