Literature DB >> 31827346

Reliability, Validity and Usefulness of a New Response Time Test for Agility-Based Sports: A Simple vs. Complex Motor Task.

Haris Pojskic1,2, Jeffrey Pagaduan3, Edin Uzicanin4, Vlatko Separovic4, Miodrag Spasic5, Nikola Foretic5, Damir Sekulic5.   

Abstract

The importance of response time (RT) in sports is well known, but there is an evident lack of reliable and valid sport-specific measurement tools applicable in the evaluation of RT in trained athletes. This study aimed to identify the validity, reliability, and usefulness of four newly developed RT testing protocols among athletes from agility-saturated (AG) and non-agility-saturated (NAG) sports. Thirty-seven AG and ten NAG athletes (age: 20.9 ± 2.9; eleven females) volunteered to undergo: three randomized simple response time (SRT-1, SRT-2, and SRT-3) protocols that included a single limb movement, and one complex response time (CRT) protocol that included multi joint movements and whole body transition over a short distance (1.5 and 1.8m). Each RT test involved 3 trials with 5 randomized attempts per trial. Two sensors were placed at the left- and right-hand side for SRT-1 and SRT-2. Three sensors were positioned (left, middle, right) in SRT-3 and CRT. The intra-class-correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated as a measure of reliability. Independent sample t-test, effect size (d), and area-under-the-curve (AUC) were calculated to define discriminative validity of the tests. The results showed the newly developed tests were more reliable and useful in the AG than NAG athletes (i.e., ICC between 0.68 and 0.97 versus 0.31-0.90, respectively). The RT of AG athletes was faster than that of NAG athletes in the CRT test from the left (p <0.01, d = 2.40, AUC: 0.98), centre (p < 0.01, d = 1.57, AUC: 0.89), and right sensor (p < 0.01, d = 1.93, AUC: 0.89) locations. In contrast, there were no differences between the groups in the SRT tests. The weak correlation (i.e., r= 0.00-0.33) between the SRT and CRT tests suggests that response time of the single limb and multijoint limb movements should not be considered as a single motor capacity. In conclusion, this study showed that AG athletes had faster response time than their NAG peers during complex motor tasks. Such enhanced ability to rapidly and accurately reprogram complex motor tasks can be considered one of the essential qualities required for advanced performance in agility-based sports. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Keywords:  neuromotor memory; perception; reach and touch; reaction time; reactive agility

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31827346      PMCID: PMC6873124     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  43 in total

1.  Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.

Authors:  W G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  The 1991 C. H. McCloy Research Lecture: unraveling the mystery of the response complexity effect in skilled movements.

Authors:  R W Christina
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Reliability, usefulness, and validity of the 30-15 Intermittent Ice Test in young elite ice hockey players.

Authors:  Martin Buchheit; Benjamin Lefebvre; Paul B Laursen; Said Ahmaidi
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Sport specific fitness status in junior water polo players--Playing position approach.

Authors:  K Idrizovic; O Uljevic; M Spasic; D Sekulic; M Kondric
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Test Re-Test Reliability of Four Versions of the 3-Cone Test in Non-Athletic Men.

Authors:  Jason G Langley; Robert D Chetlin
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Effects of oncoming target velocities on rapid force production and accuracy of force production intensity and timing.

Authors:  Yoichi Ohta
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

8.  Predicting agility performance with other performance variables in pubescent boys: a multiple-regression approach.

Authors:  Damir Sekulic; Miodrag Spasic; Michael R Esco
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2014-04

9.  Mixed Training Methods: Effects of Combining Resisted Sprints or Plyometrics with Optimum Power Loads on Sprint and Agility Performance in Professional Soccer Players.

Authors:  Irineu Loturco; Ronaldo Kobal; Katia Kitamura; Cesar C Cal Abad; Bruno Faust; Lucas Almeida; Lucas A Pereira
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Social Cues Alter Implicit Motor Learning in a Serial Reaction Time Task.

Authors:  Alexander Geiger; Axel Cleeremans; Gary Bente; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Reliability and Validity of a Novel Sport-Specific Balance Test to Differentiate Performance Levels in Elite Curling Players.

Authors:  Haris Pojskic; Kerry McGawley; Anna Gustafsson; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Effects of different exercise training modes on muscle strength and physical performance in older people with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Linqian Lu; Lin Mao; Yuwei Feng; Barbara E Ainsworth; Yu Liu; Nan Chen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Intraday reliability, sensitivity, and minimum detectable change of national physical fitness measurement for preschool children in China.

Authors:  Hua Fang; Indy Man Kit Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.