Literature DB >> 35518366

The Bigger They Are: Relationships between Body Height and Mass with the Body Drag Task in Law Enforcement Recruits.

Robert G Lockie1, J Jay Dawes2,3, Robin M Orr4, Joseph M Dulla4.   

Abstract

California law enforcement recruits must perform a body drag before they graduate academy. While this task may be challenging for smaller recruits, no research has analyzed height and body mass relationships with the body drag. Data from 643 recruits (542 males, 101 females) who completed the drag in the final weeks of academy were analyzed. The recruits lifted a 74.84-kg, 1.73-m tall dummy and dragged it 9.75 m as quickly as possible. Independent samples t-tests compared the sexes; partial correlations controlling for sex detailed relationships between height and body mass with drag time. Recruits were split into quartile groups (based on sample size) for height and body mass (Group 1: shortest, lightest; Group 4: tallest, heaviest). A one-way MANOVA, with sex as a covariate, and Bonferroni post hoc, compared the groups. Male recruits were taller, heavier, and completed the drag faster than females (p < 0.001). There were small relationships between height (r = -0.255) and body mass (r = -0.211) with drag time. When split into height groups, the shortest recruits (Group 1) completed the drag 23-37% slower than all groups (p ≤ 0.031). When split into body mass groups, the lightest recruits (Group 1) were 23-35% slower than all groups (p ≤ 0.007). Most females (94-96%) were placed in Groups 1 or 2. Height and body mass could influence drag performance. Taller recruits may be able to lift the dummy off the ground, reducing friction, while heavier recruits may produce more force. Female and smaller male recruits should complete strength and power training to mitigate body size limitations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropometry; Work Sample Test Battery; casualty drag; occupational testing; police; tactical; victim drag

Year:  2022        PMID: 35518366      PMCID: PMC9022702     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci        ISSN: 1939-795X


  39 in total

1.  Reliability of performance measurements derived from ground reaction force data during countermovement jump and the influence of sampling frequency.

Authors:  Naruhiro Hori; Robert U Newton; Naoki Kawamori; Michael R McGuigan; William J Kraemer; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Reliability and accuracy of handheld stopwatches compared with electronic timing in measuring sprint performance.

Authors:  Ronald K Hetzler; Christopher D Stickley; Kelly M Lundquist; Iris F Kimura
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Relationship of Physical Fitness Measures vs. Occupational Physical Ability in Campus Law Enforcement Officers.

Authors:  Annie Q Beck; Jody L Clasey; James W Yates; Nicole C Koebke; Thomas G Palmer; Mark G Abel
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Validity and reliability of hand and electronic timing for 40-yd sprint in college football players.

Authors:  J Bryan Mann; Pat J Ivey; William F Brechue; Jerry L Mayhew
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  The Impact of Formal Strength and Conditioning on the Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; J Jay Dawes; Nicholas D Maclean; Rodney P Pope; Ryan J Holmes; Charlie L Kornhauser; Robin M Orr
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

6.  U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Reliability of Simulations of Physically Demanding Tasks Performed by Combat Arms Soldiers.

Authors:  Stephen A Foulis; Jan E Redmond; Peter N Frykman; Bradley J Warr; Edward J Zambraski; Marilyn A Sharp
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Aviation Rescue Firefighters physical fitness and predictors of task performance.

Authors:  Tina L Skinner; Vincent G Kelly; Alexander N Boytar; Gmee Geeske Peeters; Steven B Rynne
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.319

8.  Relationship of Anthropometric Measures on Female Trainees' and Active Duty Soldiers' Performance of Common Soldiering Tasks.

Authors:  Jan E Redmond; Bruce S Cohen; Caitlin C Haven; Joseph R Pierce; Stephen A Foulis; Peter N Frykman; Maria C Canino; Marilyn A Sharp
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Relationships Between Tests of Strength, Power, and Speed and the 75-Yard Pursuit Run.

Authors:  Brett K Post; J Jay Dawes; Robert G Lockie
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Physical Fitness Characteristics That Relate to Work Sample Test Battery Performance in Law Enforcement Recruits.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; J Jay Dawes; Katherine Balfany; Ciara E Gonzales; Maria M Beitzel; Joseph M Dulla; Robin M Orr
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.