Literature DB >> 24149530

Validity of a dietary calcium questionnaire modified to include supplement use in athletes.

Morgan B Henry1, Hawley C Almstedt.   

Abstract

When conducting research in the area of bone health, accurate measurement of calcium intake is crucial. The rapid assessment method (RAM) is one technique that has frequently been used for its measurement of calcium intake. However, the RAM and other currently established questionnaires lack the assessment of dietary supplement use, which is common for athletes. Our objective was to evaluate the validity of a RAM questionnaire designed to assess daily calcium consumption which was further modified to meet the needs of athletes who frequently consume dietary supplements. Usefulness of the modified RAM for athletes and non-athletes was evaluated as well as utility among those who do and do not use supplements. The 47 volunteers (n = 31 women, 16 men) were between the ages of 18 and 25 including, 33 athletes and 14 controls. The population also contained 23 supplement users and 24 non-supplement users. Participants completed the modified RAM and were instructed to complete a three-day diet record (3DR), logging food intake for 2 weekdays and 1 weekend day. The data collected via the modified RAM was compared with the 3DR. Mean calcium intake was 935mg ± 420mg and 1085mg ± 573mg, for the modified RAM and 3DR respectively. A strong positive correlation (r) was found between calcium intake measured with the modified RAM and 3DRs (r(45) = 0.854, p < 0.01). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) revealed that agreement between the two instruments was good (ICC = 0.76, df = 45, p < 0.01) and much improved when compared to agreements without consideration of supplements (ICC = 0.05, df = 21, p > 0.05). We have found the modified RAM to be a valid tool which can be used to estimate calcium intake in the athletes and controls we strive to study. The accuracy of this instrument improved by including assessment of dietary supplement sources of calcium. Key pointsWhen conducting research on bone health, accurate measurement of calcium intake is crucial. The rapid assessment method (RAM) is one technique that has frequently been used for its measurement; however, currently established questionnaires lack assessment of dietary supplement use, which is common for athletes.We report that estimated calcium intake from the LMU RAM modified to evaluate supplement use has good agreement with three-day diet records (3DRs). There was a strong correlation between the two methods with about 69% (r = 0.83, r(2) = 0.69) of the variability in calcium intake quantified via the LMU RAM being accounted for by the 3DR.Calculated intraclass correlation coefficients between 0.63 and 0.77 reveal that the LMU RAM appears to be a valid tool of measuring daily calcium intake in athletes and non-athletes and among those who do and do not use supplements.When evaluating calcium intake without considering supplements, agreement (ICC) and correlation (r) values decreased considerably.We found the LMU RAM to be a valid measurement of calcium intake in athletes and controls. Without the addition of a section on supplement use, estimated calcium intake would have decreased an average of 32%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sports nutrition; athletic; bone health; osteoporosis.; rapid assessment

Year:  2009        PMID: 24149530      PMCID: PMC3761480     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  10 in total

1.  Dietary intake of ten key nutrients for public health, United States: 1999-2000.

Authors:  Jacqueline D Wright; Chia-Yih Wang; Jocelyn Kennedy-Stephenson; R Bethene Ervin
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2003-04-17

2.  Prevalence of leading types of dietary supplements used in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988--94.

Authors:  R Bethene Ervin; Jacqueline D Wright; Debra Reed-Gillette
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2004-11-09

3.  A mail survey of physical activity habits as related to measured physical fitness.

Authors:  H W Kohl; S N Blair; R S Paffenbarger; C A Macera; J J Kronenfeld
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  A simple method for assessing calcium intake in Caucasian women.

Authors:  R M Angus; P N Sambrook; N A Pocock; J A Eisman
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1989-02

Review 5.  Calcium requirements for the athlete.

Authors:  Katherine Kunstel
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Food sources of calcium in a sample of African-American an Euro-American collegiate athletes.

Authors:  D Leachman Slawson; B S McClanahan; L H Clemens; K D Ward; R C Klesges; C M Vukadinovich; E D Cantler
Journal:  Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 7.  Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Precision and estimated accuracy of two short-term food frequency questionnaires compared with recalls and records.

Authors:  L H Eck; L M Klesges; R C Klesges
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Reliability and validity of a brief questionnaire to assess calcium intake in female collegiate athletes.

Authors:  Kenneth D Ward; Kami Mays Hunt; Melanie Burstyne Berg; Deborah A Slawson; Christopher M Vukadinovich; Barbara S McClanahan; Linda H Clemens
Journal:  Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Reliability and validity of self-report of vitamin and mineral supplement use in the vitamins and lifestyle study.

Authors:  Jessie Satia-Abouta; Ruth E Patterson; Irena B King; Kayla L Stratton; Ann L Shattuck; Alan R Kristal; John D Potter; Mark D Thornquist; Emily White
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Whole Body Vibration Training is Osteogenic at the Spine in College-Age Men and Women.

Authors:  Gianna C Ligouri; Todd C Shoepe; Hawley C Almstedt
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.193

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.