Literature DB >> 24149153

Trunk muscle activities during abdominal bracing: comparison among muscles and exercises.

Sumiaki Maeo1, Takumi Takahashi, Yohei Takai, Hiroaki Kanehisa.   

Abstract

Abdominal bracing is often adopted in fitness and sports conditioning programs. However, there is little information on how muscular activities during the task differ among the muscle groups located in the trunk and from those during other trunk exercises. The present study aimed to quantify muscular activity levels during abdominal bracing with respect to muscle- and exercise-related differences. Ten healthy young adult men performed five static (abdominal bracing, abdominal hollowing, prone, side, and supine plank) and five dynamic (V- sits, curl-ups, sit-ups, and back extensions on the floor and on a bench) exercises. Surface electromyogram (EMG) activities of the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and erector spinae (ES) muscles were recorded in each of the exercises. The EMG data were normalized to those obtained during maximal voluntary contraction of each muscle (% EMGmax). The % EMGmax value during abdominal bracing was significantly higher in IO (60%) than in the other muscles (RA: 18%, EO: 27%, ES: 19%). The % EMGmax values for RA, EO, and ES were significantly lower in the abdominal bracing than in some of the other exercises such as V-sits and sit-ups for RA and EO and back extensions for ES muscle. However, the % EMGmax value for IO during the abdominal bracing was significantly higher than those in most of the other exercises including dynamic ones such as curl-ups and sit-ups. These results suggest that abdominal bracing is one of the most effective techniques for inducing a higher activation in deep abdominal muscles, such as IO muscle, even compared to dynamic exercises involving trunk flexion/extension movements. Key PointsTrunk muscle activities during abdominal bracing was examined with regard to muscle- and exercise-related differences.Abdominal bracing preferentially activates internal oblique muscles even compared to dynamic exercises involving trunk flexion/extension movements.Abdominal bracing should be included in exercise programs when the goal is to improve spine stability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Static and dynamic exercises; electromyogram; muscle- and exercise-related differences; voluntary co-contraction

Year:  2013        PMID: 24149153      PMCID: PMC3772590     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  29 in total

Review 1.  Low back stability: from formal description to issues for performance and rehabilitation.

Authors:  S M McGill
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.230

Review 2.  Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering.

Authors:  A Bergmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

3.  Effects of different levels of torso coactivation on trunk muscular and kinematic responses to posteriorly applied sudden loads.

Authors:  Francisco J Vera-Garcia; Stephen H M Brown; John R Gray; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  Core stability training: applications to sports conditioning programs.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Willardson
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Optimizing performance by improving core stability and core strength.

Authors:  Angela E Hibbs; Kevin G Thompson; Duncan French; Allan Wrigley; Iain Spears
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Electromyographic studies in abdominal exercises: a literature synthesis.

Authors:  Manuel Monfort-Pañego; Francisco J Vera-García; Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga; Maria Angeles Sarti-Martínez
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  EMG signal amplitude assessment during abdominal bracing and hollowing.

Authors:  G T Allison; P Godfrey; G Robinson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 8.  Systematic review of core muscle activity during physical fitness exercises.

Authors:  Jason M Martuscello; James L Nuzzo; Candi D Ashley; Bill I Campbell; John J Orriola; John M Mayer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Trunk muscle activity during exercises performed on land and in water.

Authors:  Eadric Bressel; Dennis G Dolny; Mandi Gibbons
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Was Sherrington right about co-contractions?

Authors:  A E Tyler; R S Hutton
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-04-02       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  19 in total

1.  Is muscular activity level during abdominal bracing trainable? A comparison study between bodybuilders and non-athletes.

Authors:  Sumiaki Maeo; Takumi Takahashi; Yohei Takai; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Maximal Voluntary Co-Contraction Training may not Always be Effective for Some Leg Muscles.

Authors:  Sumiaki Maeo; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Effect of abdominal bracing training on strength and power of trunk and lower limb muscles.

Authors:  Kota Tayashiki; Sumiaki Maeo; Seiji Usui; Naokazu Miyamoto; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Causal effect of intra-abdominal pressure on maximal voluntary isometric hip extension torque.

Authors:  Kota Tayashiki; Fumihiro Mizuno; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Naokazu Miyamoto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Progressions of core stabilization exercises based on postural control challenge assessment.

Authors:  Francisco J Vera-Garcia; Belen Irles-Vidal; Amaya Prat-Luri; María Pilar García-Vaquero; David Barbado; Casto Juan-Recio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Muscular activities during sling- and ground-based push-up exercise.

Authors:  Sumiaki Maeo; Tatsuya Chou; Masayoshi Yamamoto; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-03-28

7.  The effects of aquatic trunk exercise on gait and muscle activity in stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Byoung-Sun Park; Ji-Woong Noh; Mee-Young Kim; Lim-Kyu Lee; Seung-Min Yang; Won-Deok Lee; Yong-Sub Shin; Ju-Hyun Kim; Jeong-Uk Lee; Taek-Yong Kwak; Tae-Hyun Lee; Ju-Young Kim; Jaehong Park; Junghwan Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-11-30

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of the Effects of Exercise and Physical Activity on Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Rebecca Gordon; Saul Bloxham
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-25

9. 

Authors:  Yohei Takai; Miyuki Nakatani; Takuya Akamine; Katsuyuki Shiokawa; Daisuke Komori; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2017-08-09

10.  Not only static: Stabilization manoeuvres in dynamic exercises - A pilot study.

Authors:  Giedrė Vaičienė; Kristina Berškienė; Agne Slapsinskaite; Vilma Mauricienė; Selen Razon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.