Literature DB >> 27377782

Effect of abdominal bracing training on strength and power of trunk and lower limb muscles.

Kota Tayashiki1, Sumiaki Maeo2,3, Seiji Usui1, Naokazu Miyamoto1, Hiroaki Kanehisa4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is unknown whether maximal voluntary co-contraction of abdominal muscles, called abdominal bracing, can be a training maneuver for improving strength and power of trunk and lower limb muscles. The present study aimed to elucidate this.
METHODS: Twenty young adult men (23.3 ± 1.8 years) were allocated to training (TG, n = 11) or control (CG, n = 9) group. TG conducted an 8-week training program (3 days/week) consisting of 2-s maximal abdominal bracing followed by 2-s muscle relaxation (5 × 10 repetitions/day). Maximal voluntary isometric strength during trunk flexion and extension, hip extension, and knee extension, maximal lifting power from sitting position, and the thicknesses of abdominal muscles were measured before and after the intervention. In addition, surface electromyograms from trunk and lower limb muscles and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during the maximal abdominal bracing and maximal lifting tasks were also determined.
RESULTS: After the intervention, TG showed significant increases in isometric trunk extension (+14.4 %) and hip extension (+34.7 %) strength and maximal lifting power (+15.6 %), while CG did not show any changes in strength and power variables. Furthermore, TG had significant gains in the muscle thickness of the oblique internal (+22.4 %), maximal IAP during abdominal bracing (+36.8 %), and the rate of IAP rise during lifting task (+58.8 %), without corresponding changes in CG.
CONCLUSION: The current study indicates that a training style with maximal voluntary co-contraction of abdominal muscles can be an effective maneuver for increasing strength and power during movements involving trunk and hip extensions, without using external load.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal co-contraction; Abdominal muscle thickness; Electromyogram; Intra-abdominal pressure; Stabilization exercise

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27377782     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3424-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  38 in total

1.  Increase in spinal stability obtained at levels of intra-abdominal pressure and back muscle activity realistic to work situations.

Authors:  M Essendrop; T B Andersen; B Schibye
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Randomized controlled trial of the effects of a trunk stabilization program on trunk control and knee loading.

Authors:  Steve T Jamison; Ryan J McNeilan; Gregory S Young; Deborah L Givens; Thomas M Best; Ajit M W Chaudhari
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Determinants of difference in leg stiffness between endurance- and power-trained athletes.

Authors:  Hiroaki Hobara; Kozo Kimura; Kohei Omuro; Kouki Gomi; Tetsuro Muraoka; Shigeo Iso; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The effect of trunk stability training on vertical takeoff velocity.

Authors:  Scott J Butcher; Bruce R Craven; Philip D Chilibeck; Kevin S Spink; Stacy Lovo Grona; Eric J Sprigings
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Immediate changes in feedforward postural adjustments following voluntary motor training.

Authors:  Henry Tsao; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Core stability training: applications to sports conditioning programs.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Willardson
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Changes in intra-abdominal pressure and spontaneous breath volume by magnitude of lifting effort: highly trained athletes versus healthy men.

Authors:  Masashi Kawabata; Norihiro Shima; Hatsuyuki Hamada; Isamu Nakamura; Hidetsugu Nishizono
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology position stand: The use of instability to train the core in athletic and nonathletic conditioning.

Authors:  David G Behm; Eric J Drinkwater; Jeffrey M Willardson; Patrick M Cowley
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.665

9.  Feedforward contraction of transversus abdominis is not influenced by the direction of arm movement.

Authors:  P W Hodges; C A Richardson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Regular change in spontaneous preparative behaviour on intra-abdominal pressure and breathing during dynamic lifting.

Authors:  Masashi Kawabata; Norihiro Shima; Hidetsugu Nishizono
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.078

View more
  10 in total

1.  Associations of maximal voluntary isometric hip extension torque with muscle size of hamstring and gluteus maximus and intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Kota Tayashiki; Kosuke Hirata; Kiraku Ishida; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Naokazu Miyamoto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Causal effect of intra-abdominal pressure on maximal voluntary isometric hip extension torque.

Authors:  Kota Tayashiki; Fumihiro Mizuno; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Naokazu Miyamoto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Reduction of Knee Pain in a 45-Year-Old Woman After Pelvic Manipulation and Kinesiology Taping: A Case Report.

Authors:  Daniel W Bucek
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2020-08-21

4.  Effect of Interventions for Improving Lumbar Motor Control on Low Back Pain in Sedentary Office Workers: A Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Takaaki Nishimura; Masayasu Tanaka; Natsuko Morikoshi; Tamaki Yoshizawa; Ryo Miyachi
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2021-09-29

5.  Variables Affecting Intra-abdominal Pressure During Lifting in the Early Postpartum Period.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Stefan Niederauer; Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw; Xiaoming Sheng
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  Intra-abdominal Pressure and Pelvic Floor Health: Should We Be Thinking About This Relationship Differently?

Authors:  Martin Dietze-Hermosa; Robert Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Comparison of abdominal muscle activity during abdominal drawing-in maneuver combined with irradiation variations.

Authors:  Young-In Hwang; Du-Jin Park
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2017-06-30

8. 

Authors:  Yohei Takai; Miyuki Nakatani; Takuya Akamine; Katsuyuki Shiokawa; Daisuke Komori; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2017-08-09

9.  Effect of the Abdominal Draw-In Maneuver and Bracing on Abdominal Muscle Thickness and the Associated Subjective Difficulty in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Sachiko Madokoro; Masami Yokogawa; Hiroichi Miaki
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-19

10.  Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Thickness between the Abdominal Draw-in Maneuver and Maximum Abdominal Contraction Maneuver.

Authors:  Seo-Yoon Park; Seunghue Oh; Ki-Hyun Baek; Sung-Soo Bae; Jung-Won Kwon
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.