Literature DB >> 3708319

Was Sherrington right about co-contractions?

A E Tyler, R S Hutton.   

Abstract

Differences in electromyographic (EMG) activity between brief isometric maximum voluntary contractions under conditions of agonist contraction and agonist-antagonist co-contractions were assessed for elbow flexors (biceps brachii) and elbow extensors (triceps, long head). Expressing maximum EMG co-contraction activity as a ratio of agonist maximum EMG activity of the same muscle yielded EMG ratios consistently below 1.0 (mean = 0.48 for flexion and 0.76 for extension). Flexor EMG ratios did not co-vary with elbow position but extensor EMG ratios approached 1.0 or sometimes greater at shorter muscle lengths (elbow extension). Findings were in general accord with Sherrington's original proposal of 'double reciprocal innervation'. Neural circuitry designed to limit full muscle activation during co-contractions may serve to protect the joint against excessive tangential or compressive forces.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3708319     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)91119-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  21 in total

1.  Effects of whole body vibration on motor unit recruitment and threshold.

Authors:  Ross D Pollock; Roger C Woledge; Finbarr C Martin; Di J Newham
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-11-17

2.  The effectiveness of resistance training using unstable surfaces and devices for rehabilitation.

Authors:  David Behm; Juan Carlos Colado
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  [Functional disorders and functional diseases in the region of the upper cervical spine particularly regarding the cervical joints. Current status and clinical relevance].

Authors:  R Kayser; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Neuromuscular adaptations following 12-week maximal voluntary co-contraction training.

Authors:  Sumiaki Maeo; Yasuhide Yoshitake; Yohei Takai; Tetsuo Fukunaga; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Trunk muscle activities during abdominal bracing: comparison among muscles and exercises.

Authors:  Sumiaki Maeo; Takumi Takahashi; Yohei Takai; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  The potential neural mechanisms of acute indirect vibration.

Authors:  Darryl J Cochrane
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Effects of unilateral isometric strength training on joint angle specificity and cross-training.

Authors:  J P Weir; T J Housh; L L Weir; G O Johnson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

Review 8.  Quantification of quadriceps and hamstring antagonist activity.

Authors:  E Kellis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness.

Authors:  T E Milner; C Cloutier; A B Leger; D W Franklin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Evidence of facilitation of soleus-coupled Renshaw cells during voluntary co-contraction of antagonistic ankle muscles in man.

Authors:  J Nielsen; E Pierrot-Deseilligny
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.