Literature DB >> 24149110

Men (aged 40-49 years) with a single baseline prostate-specific antigen below 1.0 ng/mL have a very low long-term risk of prostate cancer: results from a prospectively screened population cohort.

Christopher J Weight1, Simon P Kim, Debra J Jacobson, Michaela E McGree, R Jeffrey Karnes, Jennifer St Sauver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the use of a baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination in men (aged 40-49 years) in predicting long-term prostate cancer risk in a prospectively followed, representative population cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 1990, a random sample of men in Olmsted County (aged 40-49 years) has been followed up prospectively (n = 268), with biennial visits, including a urologic questionnaire, PSA screening, and physical examination. The ensuing risk of prostate cancer (CaP) was compared using survival analyses.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 16.3 years (interquartile range 14.0-17.3, max 19.1). For men with a baseline PSA <1.0 ng/mL (n = 195), the risk of subsequent Gleason 6 CaP diagnosis by 55 years was 0.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-1.7%) and 15.7% (95% CI 6.5%-24.9%) for men with a baseline PSA ≥ 1.0 ng/mL. No man with a low baseline PSA developed an intermediate or high risk CaP, whereas 2.6% of men with a higher baseline PSA did (95% CI 0.58%-4.6%).
CONCLUSION: Men (aged 40-49 years) can be stratified with a baseline PSA. If it is below 1.0 ng/mL, there is very little risk for developing a lethal CaP, and as many as 75% of men might be able to avoid additional PSA screening until 55 years. Conversely, men aged 40-49 years with a baseline PSA level >1.0 ng/mL had a significant risk of CaP diagnosis and should be monitored more closely.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24149110      PMCID: PMC4029421          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  25 in total

1.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Michael K Brawer; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; William J Aronson; Steven Fox; Jeffrey R Gingrich; John T Wei; Patricia Gilhooly; B Mayer Grob; Imad Nsouli; Padmini Iyer; Ruben Cartagena; Glenn Snider; Claus Roehrborn; Roohollah Sharifi; William Blank; Parikshit Pandya; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Prostate specific antigen levels in young adulthood predict prostate cancer risk: results from a cohort of Black and White Americans.

Authors:  Alice S Whittemore; Piera M Cirillo; David Feldman; Barbara A Cohn
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Low levels of prostate-specific antigen predict long-term risk of prostate cancer: results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.

Authors:  J Fang; E J Metter; P Landis; D W Chan; C H Morrell; H B Carter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Long-term prediction of prostate cancer up to 25 years before diagnosis of prostate cancer using prostate kallikreins measured at age 44 to 50 years.

Authors:  Hans Lilja; David Ulmert; Thomas Björk; Charlotte Becker; Angel M Serio; Jan-Ake Nilsson; Per-Anders Abrahamsson; Andrew J Vickers; Göran Berglund
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Baseline prostate-specific antigen compared with median prostate-specific antigen for age group as predictor of prostate cancer risk in men younger than 60 years old.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Kimberly A Roehl; Jo Ann V Antenor; William J Catalona; Brian K Suarez; Robert B Nadler
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Is additional testing necessary in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 1.0 ng/mL or less in a population-based screening setting? (ERSPC, section Rotterdam).

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Dina W Roobol; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges.

Authors:  J E Oesterling; S J Jacobsen; C G Chute; H A Guess; C J Girman; L A Panser; M M Lieber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Prostate-specific antigen as predictor of prostate cancer in black men and white men.

Authors:  A S Whittemore; C Lele; G D Friedman; T Stamey; J H Vogelman; N Orentreich
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986-2005.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Peter C Albertsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Prostate-specific antigen at or before age 50 as a predictor of advanced prostate cancer diagnosed up to 25 years later: a case-control study.

Authors:  David Ulmert; Angel M Cronin; Thomas Björk; Matthew F O'Brien; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Charlotte Becker; Göran Berglund; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards prostate cancer screening amongst men living in the southern Italian peninsula: the Prevention and Research in Oncology (PRO) non-profit Foundation experience.

Authors:  Vincenzo Mirone; Ciro Imbimbo; Davide Arcaniolo; Marco Franco; Roberto La Rocca; Luca Venturino; Lorenzo Spirito; Massimiliano Creta; Paolo Verze
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The Effects of Population-based Prostate-specific Antigen Screening Beginning at Age 40.

Authors:  Christopher J Weight; Vikram M Narayan; Daniel Smith; Simon P Kim; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.649

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.