Literature DB >> 24146049

Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.

Guilherme Moreira de Abreu-e-Silva1, Mcbrite H G Castro Nunes de Oliveira, Gustavo Silame Maranhão, Lucas de Melo Castro Deligne, Rudolf Moreira Pfeilsticker, Eduardo Nilo Vasconcellos Novais, Tarcizo Afonso Nunes, Marco Antônio Percope de Andrade.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Femoral and tibial footprint coordinates have been well studied in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, in a single-bundle reconstruction approach, the central coordinate of femoral and tibial footprints have not been determined. The purpose of this study was to describe the central point locations of the ACL footprints visualized by three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) images and analysed by the quadrant method.
METHODS: Eight cadaveric knees were dissected, and the central points of ACL femoral and tibial footprints were marked and analysed using 3D CT images.
RESULTS: In the present study, the means (and standard deviation) of ACL femoral footprint dimensions were in the ventral-dorsal plane and in the cranial-caudal plane 9.4 ± 0.8 and 15.6 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. In the tibial side, the means of ACL footprint dimensions were in the anterior-posterior and in the medial-lateral 18.5 ± 1.9 and 15.5 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. In the tomographic analyses, the means of femoral central location coordinates in the ventral-dorsal (y) and in the cranial-caudal (x) axes were 35.3 ± 4.5 and 30.0 ± 1.6 %, respectively. The means of tibial central location coordinates were in the anterior-posterior (y) and in the medial-lateral (x) axes, respectively: 40.5 ± 5.3 and 50.2 ± 1.3 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These computed tomographic coordinates might help future studies as a reference on ACL single-bundle anatomic reconstruction, with respect to the management of ACL revision surgery or in symptomatic patients after ACL reconstruction. Improvements in three-dimensional image acquisition could facilitate its intraoperative applicability in the coming years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24146049     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2703-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  43 in total

1.  Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Brian Forsythe; Andrew K Wong; Scott Tashman; William Anderst; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Mochizuki; Takeshi Muneta; Tsuyoshi Nagase; Shin-Ichi Shirasawa; Kei-Ich Akita; Ichiro Sekiya
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): navigating the fifth dimension: innovative interface for multidimensional multimodality image navigation.

Authors:  Antoine Rosset; Luca Spadola; Lance Pysher; Osman Ratib
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints.

Authors:  Harehiko Tsukada; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Eiichi Tsuda; Akira Fukuda; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.601

5.  Bony and soft tissue landmarks of the ACL tibial insertion site: an anatomical study.

Authors:  Mario Ferretti; Daniel Doca; Sheila M Ingham; Moises Cohen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Thomas Ellert; Stefan Metz; Juergen Metz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  E E Khalfayan; P F Sharkey; A H Alexander; J D Bruckner; E B Bynum
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Myung Chul Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Sahnghoon Lee; Chong Bum Chang; Yoon Keun Park; Hyunchul Jo; Choong Hyun Kim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Transtibial ACL reconstruction technique fails to position drill tunnels anatomically in vivo 3D CT study.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Brian Forsythe; Andrew K Wong; Scott Tashman; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Visualization of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction bone tunnels: reliability of standard radiographs, CT scans, and 3D virtual reality images.

Authors:  Duncan E Meuffels; Jan-Willem Potters; Anton H J Koning; Charles H Brown; Jan A N Verhaar; Max Reijman
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  7 in total

1.  Anatomic ACL reconstruction: the normal central tibial footprint position and a standardised technique for measuring tibial tunnel location on 3D CT.

Authors:  B Parkinson; R Gogna; C Robb; P Thompson; T Spalding
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites: comparison of plain radiography and three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging to anatomic dissection.

Authors:  Joon Kyu Lee; Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Is the contralateral tibia a reliable template for reconstruction: a three-dimensional anatomy cadaveric study.

Authors:  Pascal Schenk; Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Andreas Hingsammer; Sandro F Fucentese; Philipp Fürnstahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  On the heterogeneity of the femoral enthesis of the human ACL: microscopic anatomy and clinical implications.

Authors:  Mélanie L Beaulieu; Grace E Carey; Stephen H Schlecht; Edward M Wojtys; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2016-07-13

5.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Tunnel Location and Angle in Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Anteromedial Portal and Outside-in Techniques.

Authors:  Kang-Il Kim; Sang Hak Lee; Chanil Bae; Sung Hae Bae
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-01

6.  Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements.

Authors:  Anagha P Parkar; Miraude E A P M Adriaensen; Lasse M Giil; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-03-19

7.  Tibial Tunnel Placement in ACL Reconstruction Using a Novel Grid and Biplanar Stereoradiographic Imaging.

Authors:  Julien Montreuil; Joseph Saleh; Thierry Cresson; Jacques A De Guise; Frédéric Lavoie
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.