Literature DB >> 24145624

A genomic classifier predicting metastatic disease progression in men with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy.

A E Ross1, F Y Feng2, M Ghadessi3, N Erho3, A Crisan3, C Buerki3, D Sundi1, A P Mitra4, I A Vergara3, D J S Thompson5, T J Triche6, E Davicioni3, E J Bergstralh7, R B Jenkins8, R J Karnes9, E M Schaeffer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to their varied outcomes, men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) present a management dilemma. Here, we evaluate Decipher, a genomic classifier (GC), for its ability to predict metastasis following BCR.
METHODS: The study population included 85 clinically high-risk patients who developed BCR after RP. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, weighted Cox proportional hazard models and decision curves were used to compare GC scores to Gleason score (GS), PSA doubling time (PSAdT), time to BCR (ttBCR), the Stephenson nomogram and CAPRA-S for predicting metastatic disease progression. All tests were two-sided with a type I error probability of 5%.
RESULTS: GC scores stratified men with BCR into those who would or would not develop metastasis (8% of patients with low versus 40% with high scores developed metastasis, P<0.001). The area under the curve for predicting metastasis after BCR was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.86) for GC, compared to GS 0.64 (0.58-0.70), PSAdT 0.69 (0.61-0.77) and ttBCR 0.52 (0.46-0.59). Decision curve analysis showed that GC scores had a higher overall net benefit compared to models based solely on clinicopathologic features. In multivariable modeling with clinicopathologic variables, GC score was the only significant predictor of metastasis (P=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: When compared to clinicopathologic variables, GC better predicted metastatic progression among this cohort of men with BCR following RP. While confirmatory studies are needed, these results suggest that use of GC may allow for better selection of men requiring earlier initiation of treatment at the time of BCR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24145624      PMCID: PMC4332821          DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2013.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  27 in total

1.  Analysis of case-cohort designs.

Authors:  W E Barlow; L Ichikawa; D Rosner; S Izumi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker.

Authors:  P J Heagerty; T Lumley; M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Is the GPSM scoring algorithm for patients with prostate cancer valid in the contemporary era?

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Michael L Blute; Jeffrey M Slezak; Eric J Bergstralh; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design.

Authors:  W E Barlow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; M A Eisenberger; D W Chan; J D Pearson; P C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Fernando J Bianco; Zohar A Dotan; Christopher J DiBlasio; Alwyn Reuther; Eric A Klein; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  M L Blute; E J Bergstralh; A Iocca; B Scherer; H Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population.

Authors:  R Jeffrey Karnes; Eric J Bergstralh; Elai Davicioni; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Christine Buerki; Anirban P Mitra; Anamaria Crisan; Nicholas Erho; Ismael A Vergara; Lucia L Lam; Rachel Carlson; Darby J S Thompson; Zaid Haddad; Benedikt Zimmermann; Thomas Sierocinski; Timothy J Triche; Thomas Kollmeyer; Karla V Ballman; Peter C Black; George G Klee; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Early versus delayed hormonal therapy for prostate specific antigen only recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Judd W Moul; Hongyu Wu; Leon Sun; David G McLeod; Christopher Amling; Timothy Donahue; Leo Kusuda; Wade Sexton; Keith O'Reilly; Javier Hernandez; Andrew Chung; Douglas Soderdahl
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  40 in total

Review 1.  Multidisciplinary intervention of early, lethal metastatic prostate cancer: Report from the 2015 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting.

Authors:  Andrea K Miyahira; Joshua M Lang; Robert B Den; Isla P Garraway; Tamara L Lotan; Ashley E Ross; Tanya Stoyanova; Steve Y Cho; Jonathan W Simons; Kenneth J Pienta; Howard R Soule
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Validation of a Genomic Risk Classifier to Predict Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality in Men with Adverse Pathologic Features.

Authors:  R Jeffrey Karnes; Voleak Choeurng; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Eric A Klein; Stephen J Freedland; Nicholas Erho; Kasra Yousefi; Mandeep Takhar; Elai Davicioni; Matthew R Cooperberg; Bruce J Trock
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Contemporary Role of the Decipher® Test in Prostate Cancer Management: Current Practice and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Deepansh Dalela; Björn Löppenberg; Akshay Sood; Jesse Sammon; Firas Abdollah
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

Review 4.  [Molecular biomarkers and prognostic factors for prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Kretschmer; Y Tolkach; J Ellinger; G Kristiansen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Prostate cancer radiomics and the promise of radiogenomics.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Mandeep Takhar; Yohann Tschudi; John C Ford; Gabriel Solórzano; Nicholas Erho; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Sanoj Punnen; Elai Davicioni; Robert J Gillies; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.241

6.  Rapid Next-Generation Sequencing Method for Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risks.

Authors:  Viacheslav Y Fofanov; Kinnari Upadhyay; Alexander Pearlman; Johnny Loke; Vivian O; Yongzhao Shao; Stephen Freedland; Harry Ostrer
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 7.  Which, when and why? Rational use of tissue-based molecular testing in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A E Ross; A V D'Amico; S J Freedland
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  p16 upregulation is linked to poor prognosis in ERG negative prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christoph Burdelski; Tatsiana Dieckmann; Asmus Heumann; Claudia Hube-Magg; Martina Kluth; Burkhard Beyer; Thomas Steuber; Raisa Pompe; Markus Graefen; Ronald Simon; Sarah Minner; Maria Christina Tsourlakis; Christina Koop; Jakob Izbicki; Guido Sauter; Till Krech; Thorsten Schlomm; Waldemar Wilczak; Patrick Lebok
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-21

9.  Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Elai Davicioni; Anamaria Crisan; Robert B Jenkins; Mercedeh Ghadessi; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  ETS2 is a prostate basal cell marker and is highly expressed in prostate cancers aberrantly expressing p63.

Authors:  Alba Torres; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Elai Davicioni; Anuj Gupta; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Sarah J Wheelan; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.