PURPOSE: Patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy are candidates for secondary therapy. However, this higher risk population is heterogeneous. Many cases do not metastasize even when conservatively managed. Given the limited specificity of pathological features to predict metastasis, newer risk prediction models are needed. We report a validation study of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis after radical prostatectomy in a high risk population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case-cohort design was used to sample 1,010 patients after radical prostatectomy at high risk for recurrence who were treated from 2000 to 2006. Patients had preoperative prostate specific antigen greater than 20 ng/ml, Gleason 8 or greater, pT3b or a Mayo Clinic nomogram score of 10 or greater. Patients with metastasis at diagnosis or any prior treatment for prostate cancer were excluded from analysis. A 20% random sampling created a subcohort that included all patients with metastasis. We generated 22-marker genomic classifier scores for 219 patients with available genomic data. ROC and decision curves, competing risk and weighted regression models were used to assess genomic classifier performance. RESULTS: The genomic classifier AUC was 0.79 for predicting 5-year metastasis after radical prostatectomy. Decision curves showed that the genomic classifier net benefit exceeded that of clinical only models. The genomic classifier was the predominant predictor of metastasis on multivariable analysis. The cumulative incidence of metastasis 5 years after radical prostatectomy was 2.4%, 6.0% and 22.5% in patients with low (60%), intermediate (21%) and high (19%) genomic classifier scores, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that genomic information from the primary tumor can identify patients with adverse pathological features who are most at risk for metastasis and potentially lethal prostate cancer.
PURPOSE:Patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy are candidates for secondary therapy. However, this higher risk population is heterogeneous. Many cases do not metastasize even when conservatively managed. Given the limited specificity of pathological features to predict metastasis, newer risk prediction models are needed. We report a validation study of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis after radical prostatectomy in a high risk population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case-cohort design was used to sample 1,010 patients after radical prostatectomy at high risk for recurrence who were treated from 2000 to 2006. Patients had preoperative prostate specific antigen greater than 20 ng/ml, Gleason 8 or greater, pT3b or a Mayo Clinic nomogram score of 10 or greater. Patients with metastasis at diagnosis or any prior treatment for prostate cancer were excluded from analysis. A 20% random sampling created a subcohort that included all patients with metastasis. We generated 22-marker genomic classifier scores for 219 patients with available genomic data. ROC and decision curves, competing risk and weighted regression models were used to assess genomic classifier performance. RESULTS: The genomic classifier AUC was 0.79 for predicting 5-year metastasis after radical prostatectomy. Decision curves showed that the genomic classifier net benefit exceeded that of clinical only models. The genomic classifier was the predominant predictor of metastasis on multivariable analysis. The cumulative incidence of metastasis 5 years after radical prostatectomy was 2.4%, 6.0% and 22.5% in patients with low (60%), intermediate (21%) and high (19%) genomic classifier scores, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that genomic information from the primary tumor can identify patients with adverse pathological features who are most at risk for metastasis and potentially lethal prostate cancer.
Authors: R Houston Thompson; Michael L Blute; Jeffrey M Slezak; Eric J Bergstralh; Bradley C Leibovich Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jack Cuzick; Gregory P Swanson; Gabrielle Fisher; Arthur R Brothman; Daniel M Berney; Julia E Reid; David Mesher; V O Speights; Elzbieta Stankiewicz; Christopher S Foster; Henrik Møller; Peter Scardino; Jorja D Warren; Jimmy Park; Adib Younus; Darl D Flake; Susanne Wagner; Alexander Gutin; Jerry S Lanchbury; Steven Stone Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Thomas Wiegel; Dirk Bottke; Ursula Steiner; Alessandra Siegmann; Reinhard Golz; Stephan Störkel; Norman Willich; Axel Semjonow; Rainer Souchon; Michael Stöckle; Christian Rübe; Lothar Weissbach; Peter Althaus; Udo Rebmann; Tilman Kälble; Horst Jürgen Feldmann; Manfred Wirth; Axel Hinke; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Kurt Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nicholas Erho; Anamaria Crisan; Ismael A Vergara; Anirban P Mitra; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Christine Buerki; Eric J Bergstralh; Thomas Kollmeyer; Stephanie Fink; Zaid Haddad; Benedikt Zimmermann; Thomas Sierocinski; Karla V Ballman; Timothy J Triche; Peter C Black; R Jeffrey Karnes; George Klee; Elai Davicioni; Robert B Jenkins Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John R Prensner; Matthew K Iyer; O Alejandro Balbin; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Qi Cao; J Chad Brenner; Bharathi Laxman; Irfan A Asangani; Catherine S Grasso; Hal D Kominsky; Xuhong Cao; Xiaojun Jing; Xiaoju Wang; Javed Siddiqui; John T Wei; Daniel Robinson; Hari K Iyer; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Christopher A Maher; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2011-07-31 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Ismael A Vergara; Nicholas Erho; Timothy J Triche; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Anamaria Crisan; Thomas Sierocinski; Peter C Black; Christine Buerki; Elai Davicioni Journal: Front Genet Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Andrea K Miyahira; Joshua M Lang; Robert B Den; Isla P Garraway; Tamara L Lotan; Ashley E Ross; Tanya Stoyanova; Steve Y Cho; Jonathan W Simons; Kenneth J Pienta; Howard R Soule Journal: Prostate Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Paula J Hurley; Robert M Hughes; Brian W Simons; Jessie Huang; Rebecca M Miller; Brian Shinder; Michael C Haffner; David Esopi; Yasunori Kimura; Javaneh Jabbari; Ashley E Ross; Nicholas Erho; Ismael A Vergara; Sheila F Faraj; Elai Davicioni; George J Netto; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Steven S An; Edward M Schaeffer Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: R Jeffrey Karnes; Voleak Choeurng; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Eric A Klein; Stephen J Freedland; Nicholas Erho; Kasra Yousefi; Mandeep Takhar; Elai Davicioni; Matthew R Cooperberg; Bruce J Trock Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-04-08 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Robert B Den; Kasra Yousefi; Edouard J Trabulsi; Firas Abdollah; Voleak Choeurng; Felix Y Feng; Adam P Dicker; Costas D Lallas; Leonard G Gomella; Elai Davicioni; R Jeffrey Karnes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jonathan F Goodwin; Vishal Kothari; Justin M Drake; Shuang Zhao; Emanuela Dylgjeri; Jeffry L Dean; Matthew J Schiewer; Christopher McNair; Jennifer K Jones; Alvaro Aytes; Michael S Magee; Adam E Snook; Ziqi Zhu; Robert B Den; Ruth C Birbe; Leonard G Gomella; Nicholas A Graham; Ajay A Vashisht; James A Wohlschlegel; Thomas G Graeber; R Jeffrey Karnes; Mandeep Takhar; Elai Davicioni; Scott A Tomlins; Cory Abate-Shen; Nima Sharifi; Owen N Witte; Felix Y Feng; Karen E Knudsen Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: David Tiberi; George Rodrigues; Tom Pickles; Jim Morris; Juanita Crook; Andre-Guy Martin; Fabio Cury; Charles Catton; Himu Lukka; Andrew Warner; Daniel Taussky Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2017 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Anqi Cheng; Shanshan Zhao; Liesel M FitzGerald; Jonathan L Wright; Suzanne Kolb; R Jeffrey Karnes; Robert B Jenkins; Elai Davicioni; Elaine A Ostrander; Ziding Feng; Jian-Bing Fan; James Y Dai; Janet L Stanford Journal: Prostate Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 4.104