CONTEXT: Understanding concussion-assessmment and -management practices that athletic trainers (ATs) currently use will allow clinicians to identify potential strategies for enhancing the quality of care provided to patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess current clinical concussion diagnostic and return-to-participation practices among ATs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Web-based survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A link to the survey was sent randomly to a convenience sample of 3222 members of the National Athletic Trainers' Association. A total of 1053 (32.7%) certified ATs (experience as an AT = 11.2 ± 9.1 years) responded to the survey. INTERVENTION(S): Prospective participants received electronic correspondence informing them of the purpose of the study and providing a link to the Web-based survey instrument. A reminder e-mail was sent approximately 6 weeks later, and the survey remained online for a total of 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We collected information on the annual number of concussions assessed and tools employed to diagnose, manage, and safely return an athlete to participation. Descriptive statistics were computed for each variable. RESULTS: Participants reported observing 10.7 ± 11.0 concussions per year. Clinical examination (n = 743, 70.6%) was the most commonly reported means for evaluating and diagnosing concussion. Less than half of our respondents employed the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (n = 467, 44.3%), any variation of the Romberg test (n = 461, 43.8%), and computerized neuropsychological testing (n = 459, 43.6%). Clinical examination (n = 773, 73.4%), return-to-participation guidelines (n = 713, 67.7%), physician recommendation (n = 660, 62.7%), or player self-report (n = 447, 42.5%) contributed to the return-to-participation decisions of ATs. Only 20.8% (n = 219) of ATs reported using all 3 recommended domains of the concussion battery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a growth in the number of ATs incorporating objective clinical measures of concussion as a part of their concussion management. Conversely, fewer ATs reported using a standard clinical examination in their concussion assessment. These findings suggest ATs must continue to increase their use of both objective concussion assessment tools and the standard clinical examination.
CONTEXT: Understanding concussion-assessmment and -management practices that athletic trainers (ATs) currently use will allow clinicians to identify potential strategies for enhancing the quality of care provided to patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess current clinical concussion diagnostic and return-to-participation practices among ATs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Web-based survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A link to the survey was sent randomly to a convenience sample of 3222 members of the National Athletic Trainers' Association. A total of 1053 (32.7%) certified ATs (experience as an AT = 11.2 ± 9.1 years) responded to the survey. INTERVENTION(S): Prospective participants received electronic correspondence informing them of the purpose of the study and providing a link to the Web-based survey instrument. A reminder e-mail was sent approximately 6 weeks later, and the survey remained online for a total of 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We collected information on the annual number of concussions assessed and tools employed to diagnose, manage, and safely return an athlete to participation. Descriptive statistics were computed for each variable. RESULTS:Participants reported observing 10.7 ± 11.0 concussions per year. Clinical examination (n = 743, 70.6%) was the most commonly reported means for evaluating and diagnosing concussion. Less than half of our respondents employed the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (n = 467, 44.3%), any variation of the Romberg test (n = 461, 43.8%), and computerized neuropsychological testing (n = 459, 43.6%). Clinical examination (n = 773, 73.4%), return-to-participation guidelines (n = 713, 67.7%), physician recommendation (n = 660, 62.7%), or player self-report (n = 447, 42.5%) contributed to the return-to-participation decisions of ATs. Only 20.8% (n = 219) of ATs reported using all 3 recommended domains of the concussion battery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a growth in the number of ATs incorporating objective clinical measures of concussion as a part of their concussion management. Conversely, fewer ATs reported using a standard clinical examination in their concussion assessment. These findings suggest ATs must continue to increase their use of both objective concussion assessment tools and the standard clinical examination.
Authors: Kevin M Guskiewicz; Scott L Bruce; Robert C Cantu; Michael S Ferrara; James P Kelly; Michael McCrea; Margot Putukian; Tamara C Valovich McLeod Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Chelsea L Williamson; Grant E Norte; Donna K Broshek; Joseph M Hart; Jacob E Resch Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Carolina P Quintana; Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Anne D Olson; Nicholas R Heebner; Matthew C Hoch Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos; David O Okonkwo; Jon Almquist; Julian Bailes; Mark Barisa; Jeffrey Bazarian; O Josh Bloom; David L Brody; Robert Cantu; Javier Cardenas; Jay Clugston; Randall Cohen; Ruben Echemendia; R J Elbin; Richard Ellenbogen; Janna Fonseca; Gerard Gioia; Kevin Guskiewicz; Robert Heyer; Gillian Hotz; Grant L Iverson; Barry Jordan; Geoffrey Manley; Joseph Maroon; Thomas McAllister; Michael McCrea; Anne Mucha; Elizabeth Pieroth; Kenneth Podell; Matthew Pombo; Teena Shetty; Allen Sills; Gary Solomon; Danny G Thomas; Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Tony Yates; Ross Zafonte Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Christopher P Tomczyk; Megan Mormile; Megan S Wittenberg; Jody L Langdon; Tamerah N Hunt Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Christine M Baugh; Emily Kroshus; Julie M Stamm; Daniel H Daneshvar; Michael J Pepin; William P Meehan Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 6.202