Chelsea L Williamson1, Grant E Norte2, Donna K Broshek3, Joseph M Hart1, Jacob E Resch1. 1. Department of Kinesiology, Sports Medicine Program Area, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. 3. School of Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, Athletic Training Program, University of Toledo, OH.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Recent recommendations have emphasized return-to-learn (RTL) protocols to aid athletes in recovery from sport-related concussion (SRC) but have been based primarily on anecdotal evidence. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the RTL practices of certified athletic trainers (ATs) after an SRC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1083 individuals (27%) from a random sample of 4000 ATs in the National Athletic Trainers' Association membership database completed an electronic survey. Participants consisted of 729 self-identified secondary school ATs (SSATs; 67.3%; experience = 14.0 ± 9.7 years) and 354 self-identified collegiate ATs (CATs; 32.7%; experience = 13.4 ± 9.7 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We used χ2 analyses to assess respondent differences related to current knowledge, current practices, and available resources. Independent t tests were used to compare SSATs and CATs on years of certification and annual number of SRCs evaluated. RESULTS: Of our total respondents, 41.2% (n = 446) correctly indicated the absence of evidence-based RTL guidelines. Whereas most (73.9%, n = 800) respondents had an established RTL policy, only 38.1% (n = 413) used such guidelines in their clinical practice. Most (97.1%, n = 708) SSATs and 82.2% (n = 291) of CATs had access to (a) mental health professional(s); however, minorities of SSATs (21.4%, n = 156) and CATs (37.0%, n = 131) never accessed these resources to care for concussed student-athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that, despite the absence of empirical evidence, most surveyed ATs incorporated some form of RTL protocol in their SRC management policy. The varying AT knowledge, clinical practices, and resources highlighted by our results should be considered when creating or refining an RTL protocol.
CONTEXT: Recent recommendations have emphasized return-to-learn (RTL) protocols to aid athletes in recovery from sport-related concussion (SRC) but have been based primarily on anecdotal evidence. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the RTL practices of certified athletic trainers (ATs) after an SRC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1083 individuals (27%) from a random sample of 4000 ATs in the National Athletic Trainers' Association membership database completed an electronic survey. Participants consisted of 729 self-identified secondary school ATs (SSATs; 67.3%; experience = 14.0 ± 9.7 years) and 354 self-identified collegiate ATs (CATs; 32.7%; experience = 13.4 ± 9.7 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We used χ2 analyses to assess respondent differences related to current knowledge, current practices, and available resources. Independent t tests were used to compare SSATs and CATs on years of certification and annual number of SRCs evaluated. RESULTS: Of our total respondents, 41.2% (n = 446) correctly indicated the absence of evidence-based RTL guidelines. Whereas most (73.9%, n = 800) respondents had an established RTL policy, only 38.1% (n = 413) used such guidelines in their clinical practice. Most (97.1%, n = 708) SSATs and 82.2% (n = 291) of CATs had access to (a) mental health professional(s); however, minorities of SSATs (21.4%, n = 156) and CATs (37.0%, n = 131) never accessed these resources to care for concussed student-athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that, despite the absence of empirical evidence, most surveyed ATs incorporated some form of RTL protocol in their SRC management policy. The varying AT knowledge, clinical practices, and resources highlighted by our results should be considered when creating or refining an RTL protocol.
Authors: Michael W Collins; Mark R Lovell; Grant L Iverson; Robert C Cantu; Joseph C Maroon; Melvin Field Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Paul McCrory; Willem Meeuwisse; Jiří Dvořák; Mark Aubry; Julian Bailes; Steven Broglio; Robert C Cantu; David Cassidy; Ruben J Echemendia; Rudy J Castellani; Gavin A Davis; Richard Ellenbogen; Carolyn Emery; Lars Engebretsen; Nina Feddermann-Demont; Christopher C Giza; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Stanley Herring; Grant L Iverson; Karen M Johnston; James Kissick; Jeffrey Kutcher; John J Leddy; David Maddocks; Michael Makdissi; Geoff T Manley; Michael McCrea; William P Meehan; Shinji Nagahiro; Jon Patricios; Margot Putukian; Kathryn J Schneider; Allen Sills; Charles H Tator; Michael Turner; Pieter E Vos Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Eric E Hall; Caroline J Ketcham; Cayce R Crenshaw; Martin H Baker; Jodi M McConnell; Kirtida Patel Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: James D Carson; David W Lawrence; Sari A Kraft; Alisha Garel; Catherine L Snow; Ananda Chatterjee; Paula Libfeld; Heather M MacKenzie; Jane S Thornton; Rahim Moineddin; Pierre Frémont Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Kimberly G Harmon; Jonathan A Drezner; Matthew Gammons; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Mark Halstead; Stanley A Herring; Jeffrey S Kutcher; Andrea Pana; Margot Putukian; William O Roberts Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Zachary W Bevilacqua; Mary E Kerby; David Fletcher; Zhongxue Chen; Becca Merritt; Megan E Huibregtse; Keisuke Kawata Journal: Concussion Date: 2019-09-20