| Literature DB >> 24143234 |
Yongyue Wei1, Zhaoxi Wang, Chiung-yu Chang, Tianteng Fan, Li Su, Feng Chen, David C Christiani.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Welding-associated air pollutants negatively affect the health of exposed workers; however, their molecular mechanisms in causing disease remain largely unclear. Few studies have systematically investigated the systemic toxic effects of welding fumes on humans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24143234 PMCID: PMC3797131 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the study population.a
| Characteristic | Study-2011 ( | Study-2012 ( | |
| PM2.5 total exposure | 74.2±27.4 | 114.9±59.7 | |
| Age (years) | 49.1±10.2 | 46.1±11.7 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.5±2.9 | 28.1±3.7 | |
| Male | 11 | 8 | |
| Race |
| 9 | 6 |
|
| 1 | 0 | |
|
| 1 | 2 | |
| Medical history | 3 | 4 | |
|
| 0 | 0 | |
|
| 0 | 1 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
| 2 | 2 | |
| Medication use | 4 | 4 | |
|
| 2 | 1 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
| 0 | 1 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
| 1 | 0 | |
|
| 0 | 1 | |
|
| 0 | 1 |
Values presented either as mean±SD or n;
Five subjects participated in both studies;
At study entry.
Figure 1Flowchart for single-compound analysis.
Metabolite changes (post-welding workshop – pre-welding workshop) for 333 compounds were analyzed by regression with PM2.5 total exposure in Study-2011 (A) and Study-2012 (B), and by linear mixed-effects model in the combined dataset of both studies (C). The y-axis represents the coefficients of exposure in regression models. The x-axis represents the metabolites ordered by the effects of exposure from discovery analysis. Thirty biochemical metabolic changes significantly associated with exposure (p<0.05) in Study-2011. Three of the thirty changes were validated in Study-2012 (p<0.05) and remained significant in combined analysis: eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosapentaenoic acids (DPAn3, DPAn6).
Metabolites associated with PM2.5 metal welding fume exposure.
| Baseline | Δ (post - pre) | |||
| Metabolite | Study-2011 | Study-2012 | Study-2011 | Study-2012 |
| Eicosapentaenoate (EPA; 20∶5n3) | 1.06±0.44(0.45∼1.89) | 1.42±0.67(0.70∼2.88) | −0.06±0.58(−1.08∼0.78) | 0.06±1.28(−0.86∼3.15) |
| Docosapentaenoate (DPAn3; 22∶5n3) | 1.29±0.71(0.45∼2.68) | 1.09±0.29(0.65∼1.48) | −0.31±0.98(−1.83∼1.01) | −0.15±0.56(−1.07∼0.87) |
| Docosapentaenoate (DPAn6; 22∶5n6) | 1.32±0.60(0.52∼2.4) | 1.10±0.33(0.70∼1.67) | −0.30±0.75(−1.83∼0.74) | −0.35±0.49(−1.31∼0.22) |
Values presented as mean ± SD (min∼max).
Figure 2Scatter plots of metabolic changes by exposure of EPA and DPA.
Scatter plots illustrate the biochemical compounds that had a metabolic change significantly associated with welding fume exposure: A1) eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA); A2) EPA after removal of a potential outlier (subject ID: 358); B) docosapentaenoic acid n3 (DPAn3); and C) docosapentaenoic acid n6 (DPAn6). The x-axis represents total PM2.5 exposure during the welding workshop, while the y-axis represents biochemical metabolic change (post-welding workshop – pre-welding workshop). Black circles represent data from Study-2011; red triangles represent data from Study-2012. Each mark is labeled with the subject ID.
Association of PM2.5 metal welding fume exposure with metabolite change.
| Association analysis | Combined analysis | |||||||||
| Study-2011 | Study-2012 | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||
| Metabolite |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Eicosapentaenoate (EPA; 20:5n3) | −0.013(−0.026,−0.001) | 0.038 | −0.014(−0.027,−0.001) | 0.033 | −0.013(−0.022,−0.004) | 0.005 | 0.249 | −0.014(−0.023,−0.006) | 0.003 | 0.229 |
| Docosapentaenoate (DPAn3; 22:5n3) | −0.025(−0.044,−0.005) | 0.018 | −0.007(−0.013,−0.002) | 0.017 | −0.010(−0.018,−0.002) | 0.017 | 0.313 | −0.010(−0.019,−0.001) | 0.020 | 0.398 |
| Docosapentaenoate (DPAn6; 22:5n6) | −0.016(−0.032,−0.0002) | 0.048 | −0.006(−0.012,−0.0005) | 0.038 | −0.007(−0.013,−0.001) | 0.021 | 0.313 | −0.021(−0.013,−0.001) | 0.029 | 0.418 |
Total PM2.5 exposure as predictor, metabolite change as response;
Linear mixed-effects model was used with/without adjustment for age and medication use;
q represented FDR adjusted p value using Benjamini & Hochberg method.
Association of PM2.5 metal welding fume exposure with metabolite pathways.
| Study-2011 | Study-2012 | Combined analysis | ||||||||
| Pathway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Unsaturated fatty acid | 7 | 7 | 6 | 0.84 | 0.025 | 0.81 | 0.021 | 0.77 | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Phenylalanine & tyrosine metabolism | 13 | 8 | 1 | 0.29 | 0.013 | 0.36 | 0.547 | 0.24 | 0.425 | 0.480 |
Number of biochemical compounds within the same pathway;
Number of biochemical compounds that have the same coefficient direction when regressed by exposure both in Study-2011 and Study-2012;
Number of biochemical compounds with association p<0.05 in combined dataset analyzed by linear mixed model with adjustment of age and medication use;
First principal component (PC1) was used as response, with PM2.5 total exposure as predictor in linear regression model or linear mixed-effects model;
Proportion of variance explained by PC1;
PC1 was used as response in the linear mixed model with random slope with or without adjustment of age and medication use.
Figure 3Functional network for EPA and DPA.
Network analysis revealed that intracellular and extracellular eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) interact with 19 genes, while docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) interacts with 7 genes; EPA, DPAn3, DPAn6, and 24 regulated genes were used to build the illustrated functional network. The green line represents activation; the red line represents inhibition; the gray line represents unspecified effects.