Literature DB >> 24141896

Is there a role for routine screening MRI in women with LCIS?

Tari A King1, Shirin Muhsen, Sujata Patil, Starr Koslow, Sabine Oskar, Anna Park, Mary Morrogh, Rita A Sakr, Monica Morrow.   

Abstract

Women with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have an elevated breast cancer risk, yet the benefit of MRI screening is unclear. We examined cancer detection rates with mammography alone versus mammography plus MRI in this high-risk population. From a prospectively maintained, single-institution database, we identified 776 patients diagnosed with LCIS after the adoption of screening MRI in April 1999. In addition to annual mammography and breast exam, MRI was used at the discretion of the physician and patient. Kaplan-Meier methods and landmark analyses at 1, 2, and 3 years following LCIS diagnosis were performed to compare rates of cancer detection with or without MRI. MRI screening was performed in 455 (59 %) patients (median, 3/patient). Median time from LCIS diagnosis to first MRI was 9 months (range 0.3-137 months). Patients undergoing MRI were younger (p < 0.0001), premenopausal (p < 0.0001), and more likely to have ≥1 first-degree relative with breast cancer (p = 0.009). At a median follow-up of 58 months, 98/776 (13 %) patients developed cancer. The crude cancer detection rate in both screening groups was 13 %. MRI was not associated with earlier stage, smaller size, or node negativity. Landmark analyses at 1, 2, and 3 years after LCIS diagnosis failed to demonstrate increased cancer detection rates among women having MRI (p = 0.23, 0.26, and 0.13, respectively). Although a diagnosis of LCIS remains a significant risk factor for breast cancer, the routine use of MRI does not result in increased cancer detection rates (short-term), nor does it result in earlier stage at diagnosis, illustrating the importance of defining optimal screening strategies for high-risk patients based on tumor biology rather than numerical risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24141896      PMCID: PMC3871867          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2725-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  21 in total

1.  Is there a low-grade precursor pathway in breast cancer?

Authors:  Tari A King; Rita A Sakr; Shirin Muhsen; Victor P Andrade; Dilip Giri; Kimberly J Van Zee; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Elisa Rush Port; Anna Park; Patrick I Borgen; Elizabeth Morris; Leslie L Montgomery
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Differences in natural history between breast cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and effects of MRI screening-MRISC, MARIBS, and Canadian studies combined.

Authors:  Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Ellen Warner; Fiona J Gilbert; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Gareth Evans; Petrina A Causer; Rosalind A Eeles; Reinie Kaas; Gerrit Draisma; Elizabeth A Ramsay; Ruth M L Warren; Kimberly A Hill; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Martin N J M Wasser; Elisabeth Bergers; Jan C Oosterwijk; Maartje J Hooning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn; Don B Plewes; Martin O Leach; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Role of MRI in screening women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Screening breast MR imaging in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Janice S Sung; Sharp F Malak; Punam Bajaj; Rebecca Alis; D David Dershaw; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Results of MR imaging screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with lobular carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Lauren C Friedlander; Susan Orel Roth; Sara C Gavenonis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  BRCA1 mutation and young age predict fast breast cancer growth in the Dutch, United Kingdom, and Canadian magnetic resonance imaging screening trials.

Authors:  Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Wim C J Hop; Petrina A Causer; Martin O Leach; Ellen Warner; Linda Pointon; Kimberley Hill; Jan G M Klijn; Ruth M L Warren; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Stage of breast cancers found during the surveillance of women with a familial or hereditary risk.

Authors:  R Kaas; S H Muller; A A M Hart; E J T Rutgers
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Susan G Fisher; Bahman Emami
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Yvonne L Hoogeveen; Johan G Blickman; Carla Boetes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  11 in total

1.  The Tyrer-Cuzick Model Inaccurately Predicts Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in Women With LCIS.

Authors:  Monica G Valero; Emily C Zabor; Anna Park; Elizabeth Gilbert; Ashely Newman; Tari A King; Melissa L Pilewskie
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Current management of lesions associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Stuart J Schnitt; Larry Norton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: A 29-Year Longitudinal Experience Evaluating Clinicopathologic Features and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Tari A King; Melissa Pilewskie; Shirin Muhsen; Sujata Patil; Starr K Mautner; Anna Park; Sabine Oskar; Elena Guerini-Rocco; Camilla Boafo; Jessica C Gooch; Marina De Brot; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Mary Morrogh; Victor P Andrade; Rita A Sakr; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Janice S Sung; Lizza Lebron; Delia Keating; Donna D'Alessio; Christopher E Comstock; Carol H Lee; Malcolm C Pike; Miranda Ayhan; Chaya S Moskowitz; Elizabeth A Morris; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-11-01

6.  Synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer among women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Melissa Anne Mallory; Karissa Whiting; Anna Park; Mithat Gönen; Elizabeth Gilbert; Tari A King; Melissa L Pilewskie
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Screening MRI in Women at Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk: An Update of the Recent Literature.

Authors:  Manisha Bahl
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2022-05-08

8.  Accuracy of screening mammography in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia of the breast.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Linn A Abraham; Tracy Onega; Laura C Collins; Brian L Sprague; Deirdre A Hill; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography Screening for Intermediate-Risk Women With a History of Lobular Neoplasia.

Authors:  Molly P Hogan; Tali Amir; Varadan Sevilimedu; Janice Sung; Elizabeth A Morris; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.582

10.  Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast - correlation between minimally invasive biopsy and final pathology.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Szynglarewicz; Piotr Kasprzak; Agnieszka Hałoń; Rafał Matkowski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.