Literature DB >> 31559544

The Tyrer-Cuzick Model Inaccurately Predicts Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in Women With LCIS.

Monica G Valero1, Emily C Zabor2, Anna Park1, Elizabeth Gilbert1, Ashely Newman1, Tari A King3,4, Melissa L Pilewskie5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Tyrer-Cuzick model has been shown to overestimate risk in women with atypical hyperplasia, although its accuracy among women with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is unknown. We evaluated the accuracy of the Tyrer-Cuzick model for predicting invasive breast cancer (IBC) development among women with LCIS.
METHODS: Women with LCIS participating in surveillance from 1987 to 2017 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Tyrer-Cuzick score (version 7) was calculated near the time of LCIS diagnosis. Patients with prior or concurrent breast cancer, a BRCA mutation, receiving chemoprevention, or with pleomorphic LCIS were excluded. Invasive cancer-free probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: A total of 1192 women with a median follow-up of 6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.5-9.9) were included. Median age at LCIS diagnosis was 49 years (IQR 45-55), 88% were white; 37% were postmenopausal, 28% had ≥ 1 first-degree family member with breast cancer, and 13% had ≥ 2 second-degree family members with breast cancer. In total, 128 patients developed an IBC; median age at diagnosis was 54 years (IQR 49-61). Five- and 10-year cumulative incidences of invasive cancer were 8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-9%) and 14% (95% CI 12-17%), respectively. The median Tyrer-Cuzick 10-year risk score was 20.1 (IQR 17.4-24.3). Discrimination measured by the C-index was 0.493, confirming that the Tyrer-Cuzick model is not well calibrated in this patient population.
CONCLUSIONS: The Tyrer-Cuzick model is not accurate and may overpredict IBC risk for women with LCIS, and therefore should not be used for breast cancer risk assessment in this high-risk population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31559544      PMCID: PMC7500748          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07814-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  12 in total

1.  The influence of family history on breast cancer risk in women with biopsy-confirmed benign breast disease: results from the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Laura C Collins; Heather J Baer; Rulla M Tamimi; James L Connolly; Graham A Colditz; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Familial breast and ovarian cancer: a Swedish population-based register study.

Authors:  H Anderson; A Bladström; H Olsson; T R Möller
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Lynn C Hartmann; Stephanie S Anderson; Amy C Degnim; Robert A Vierkant; Carol A Reynolds; Marlene H Frost; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan Tyrer; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: a Mayo cohort study.

Authors:  Amy C Degnim; Daniel W Visscher; Hal K Berman; Marlene H Frost; Thomas A Sellers; Robert A Vierkant; Shaun D Maloney; V Shane Pankratz; Piet C de Groen; Wilma L Lingle; Karthik Ghosh; Lois Penheiter; Thea Tlsty; L Joseph Melton; Carol A Reynolds; Lynn C Hartmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Is there a role for routine screening MRI in women with LCIS?

Authors:  Tari A King; Shirin Muhsen; Sujata Patil; Starr Koslow; Sabine Oskar; Anna Park; Mary Morrogh; Rita A Sakr; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme.

Authors:  E Amir; D G Evans; A Shenton; F Lalloo; A Moran; C Boggis; M Wilson; A Howell
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I.

Authors:  Jane Warwick; Hanna Birke; Jennifer Stone; Ruth M L Warren; Elizabeth Pinney; Adam R Brentnall; Stephen W Duffy; Anthony Howell; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Validation of the IBIS breast cancer risk evaluator for women with lobular carcinoma in-situ.

Authors:  Louisa Lisa Lo; Roger Laughlin Milne; Yuyan Liao; Jack Cuzick; Mary Beth Terry; Kelly-Anne Phillips
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort.

Authors:  Adam R Brentnall; Elaine F Harkness; Susan M Astley; Louise S Donnelly; Paula Stavrinos; Sarah Sampson; Lynne Fox; Jamie C Sergeant; Michelle N Harvie; Mary Wilson; Ursula Beetles; Soujanya Gadde; Yit Lim; Anil Jain; Sara Bundred; Nicola Barr; Valerie Reece; Anthony Howell; Jack Cuzick; D Gareth R Evans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Identifying women with increased risk of breast cancer and implementing risk-reducing strategies and supplemental imaging.

Authors:  Suneela Vegunta; Asha A Bhatt; Sadia A Choudhery; Sandhya Pruthi; Aparna S Kaur
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Deep Learning vs Traditional Breast Cancer Risk Models to Support Risk-Based Mammography Screening.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Sarah Mercaldo; Leslie R Lamb; Tari A King; Leif W Ellisen; Michelle Specht; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 11.816

3.  Generalizability of Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer Among Women With European, African, and Latinx Ancestry.

Authors:  Cong Liu; Nur Zeinomar; Wendy K Chung; Krzysztof Kiryluk; Ali G Gharavi; George Hripcsak; Katherine D Crew; Ning Shang; Atlas Khan; David Fasel; Teri A Manolio; Gail P Jarvik; Robb Rowley; Ann E Justice; Alanna K Rahm; Stephanie M Fullerton; Jordan W Smoller; Eric B Larson; Paul K Crane; Ozan Dikilitas; Georgia L Wiesner; Alexander G Bick; Mary Beth Terry; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.