Literature DB >> 27990198

Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening with mammography can detect breast cancer early, before clinical symptoms appear. Some cancers, however, are not captured with mammography screening alone. Among women at high risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been suggested as a safe adjunct (supplemental) screening tool that can detect breast cancers missed on screening mammography, potentially reducing the number of deaths associated with the disease. However, the use of adjunct screening tests may also increase the number of false-positive test results, which may lead to unnecessary follow-up testing, as well as patient stress and anxiety. We investigated the benefits and harms of MRI as an adjunct to mammography compared with mammography alone for screening women at less than high risk (average or higher than average risk) for breast cancer.
METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) Health Technology Assessment Database, and National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database, from January 2002 to January 2016, for evidence of effectiveness, harms, and diagnostic accuracy. Only studies evaluating the use of screening breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography in the specified populations were included.
RESULTS: No studies in women at less than high risk for breast cancer met our inclusion criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: It remains uncertain if the use of adjunct screening breast MRI in women at less than high risk (average or higher than average risk) for breast cancer will reduce breast cancer-related mortality without significant increases in unnecessary follow-up testing and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27990198      PMCID: PMC5156844     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser        ISSN: 1915-7398


  46 in total

1.  Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Elisa Rush Port; Anna Park; Patrick I Borgen; Elizabeth Morris; Leslie L Montgomery
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Steven A Narod; Javaid Iqbal; Vasily Giannakeas; Victoria Sopik; Ping Sun
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Lampic; E Thurfjell; J Bergh; P O Sjödén
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 4.  Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Johanna M Rommens; Kelly Vogt; Vivian Lee; John L Hopper; Martin J Yaffe; Andrew D Paterson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Results of MR imaging screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with lobular carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Lauren C Friedlander; Susan Orel Roth; Sara C Gavenonis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review.

Authors:  Bircan Erbas; Elena Provenzano; Jane Armes; Dorota Gertig
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Rachel F Brem; Megan J Lenihan; Jennifer Lieberman; Jessica Torrente
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Hans Messersmith; Petrina Causer; Andrea Eisen; Rene Shumak; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease.

Authors:  W D Dupont; D L Page
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Annika Keulers; Kevin Strobel; Hannah Schneider; Nadine Gaisa; Simone Schrading
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 2.  A review of clinical photoacoustic imaging: Current and future trends.

Authors:  Amalina Binte Ebrahim Attia; Ghayathri Balasundaram; Mohesh Moothanchery; U S Dinish; Renzhe Bi; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Malini Olivo
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2019-11-07

3.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer Surveillance Among BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jiaxin Li; Ziqi Jia; Menglu Zhang; Gang Liu; Zeyu Xing; Xin Wang; Xin Huang; Kexin Feng; Jiang Wu; Wenyan Wang; Jie Wang; Jiaqi Liu; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.