Ipek Oguz1, Honghai Zhang, Ashley Rumple, Milan Sonka. 1. The University of Iowa, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, United States. Electronic address: ipek-oguz@uiowa.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-field MRI is a popular technique for the study of rodent brains. These datasets, while similar to human brain MRI in many aspects, present unique image processing challenges. We address a very common preprocessing step, skull-stripping, which refers to the segmentation of the brain tissue from the image for further processing. While several methods exist for addressing this problem, they are computationally expensive and often require interactive post-processing by an expert to clean up poorly segmented areas. This further increases total processing time per subject. NEW METHOD: We propose a novel algorithm, based on grayscale mathematical morphology and LOGISMOS-based graph segmentation, which is rapid, robust and highly accurate. RESULTS: Comparative results obtained on two challenging in vivo datasets, consisting of 22 T1-weighted rat brain images and 10 T2-weighted mouse brain images illustrate the robustness and excellent performance of the proposed algorithm, in a fraction of the computational time needed by existing algorithms. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: In comparison to current state-of-the-art methods, our approach achieved average Dice similarity coefficient of 0.92 ± 0.02 and average Hausdorff distance of 13.6 ± 5.2 voxels (vs. 0.85 ± 0.20, p<0.05 and 42.6 ± 22.9, p << 0.001) for the rat dataset, and 0.96 ± 0.01 and average Hausdorff distance of 21.6 ± 12.7 voxels (vs. 0.93 ± 0.01, p <<0.001 and 33.7 ± 3.5, p <<0.001) for the mouse dataset. The proposed algorithm took approximately 90s per subject, compared to 10-20 min for the neural-network based method and 30-90 min for the atlas-based method. CONCLUSIONS: RATS is a robust and computationally efficient method for accurate rodent brain skull-stripping even in challenging data.
BACKGROUND: High-field MRI is a popular technique for the study of rodent brains. These datasets, while similar to human brain MRI in many aspects, present unique image processing challenges. We address a very common preprocessing step, skull-stripping, which refers to the segmentation of the brain tissue from the image for further processing. While several methods exist for addressing this problem, they are computationally expensive and often require interactive post-processing by an expert to clean up poorly segmented areas. This further increases total processing time per subject. NEW METHOD: We propose a novel algorithm, based on grayscale mathematical morphology and LOGISMOS-based graph segmentation, which is rapid, robust and highly accurate. RESULTS: Comparative results obtained on two challenging in vivo datasets, consisting of 22 T1-weighted rat brain images and 10 T2-weighted mouse brain images illustrate the robustness and excellent performance of the proposed algorithm, in a fraction of the computational time needed by existing algorithms. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: In comparison to current state-of-the-art methods, our approach achieved average Dice similarity coefficient of 0.92 ± 0.02 and average Hausdorff distance of 13.6 ± 5.2 voxels (vs. 0.85 ± 0.20, p<0.05 and 42.6 ± 22.9, p << 0.001) for the rat dataset, and 0.96 ± 0.01 and average Hausdorff distance of 21.6 ± 12.7 voxels (vs. 0.93 ± 0.01, p <<0.001 and 33.7 ± 3.5, p <<0.001) for the mouse dataset. The proposed algorithm took approximately 90s per subject, compared to 10-20 min for the neural-network based method and 30-90 min for the atlas-based method. CONCLUSIONS:RATS is a robust and computationally efficient method for accurate rodent brain skull-stripping even in challenging data.
Authors: Yin Yin; Xiangmin Zhang; Rachel Williams; Xiaodong Wu; Donald D Anderson; Milan Sonka Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Qi Song; Junjie Bai; Mona K Garvin; Milan Sonka; John M Buatti; Xiaodong Wu Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Yu Ma; David Smith; Patrick R Hof; Bernd Foerster; Scott Hamilton; Stephen J Blackband; Mei Yu; Helene Benveniste Journal: Front Neuroanat Date: 2008-04-17 Impact factor: 3.856
Authors: Adam Delora; Aaron Gonzales; Christopher S Medina; Adam Mitchell; Abdul Faheem Mohed; Russell E Jacobs; Elaine L Bearer Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Joanes Grandjean; Carola Canella; Cynthia Anckaerts; Gülebru Ayrancı; Salma Bougacha; Thomas Bienert; David Buehlmann; Ludovico Coletta; Daniel Gallino; Natalia Gass; Clément M Garin; Nachiket Abhay Nadkarni; Neele S Hübner; Meltem Karatas; Yuji Komaki; Silke Kreitz; Francesca Mandino; Anna E Mechling; Chika Sato; Katja Sauer; Disha Shah; Sandra Strobelt; Norio Takata; Isabel Wank; Tong Wu; Noriaki Yahata; Ling Yun Yeow; Yohan Yee; Ichio Aoki; M Mallar Chakravarty; Wei-Tang Chang; Marc Dhenain; Dominik von Elverfeldt; Laura-Adela Harsan; Andreas Hess; Tianzi Jiang; Georgios A Keliris; Jason P Lerch; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Hideyuki Okano; Markus Rudin; Alexander Sartorius; Annemie Van der Linden; Marleen Verhoye; Wolfgang Weber-Fahr; Nicole Wenderoth; Valerio Zerbi; Alessandro Gozzi Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2019-10-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Saman Sargolzaei; Yan Cai; Stephanie M Wolahan; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Arman Sargolzaei; Christopher C Giza; Neil G Harris Journal: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2018-07
Authors: Eugene Kim; Davide Di Censo; Mattia Baraldo; Camilla Simmons; Ilaria Rosa; Karen Randall; Clive Ballard; Ben R Dickie; Steven C R Williams; Richard Killick; Diana Cash Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 4.379