Literature DB >> 24140209

Long-term clinical outcomes 15 years after aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis.

David S Bach1, Neal D Kon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Freestyle stentless aortic root bioprosthesis has excellent hemodynamics and durability through 10 years. The purpose of this report is to present clinical outcomes in a large multicenter cohort through 15 years.
METHODS: The multicenter evaluation of the Freestyle valve began in 1992 at 21 centers in North America and Europe. In 1997, a long-term study continued, including 725 patients from 8 of the original centers; clinical outcomes data after 10 years have continued to be collected at 6 of 8 centers.
RESULTS: Patient age was 71.7±7.9 years. There were 402 (55.4%) men and 323 (44.6%) women. Total follow-up was 5,491.2 patient-years. There were 52 late reoperations, with explant of the bioprosthesis in 47 cases. Respective 10- and 15-year survival was 46.2%±2.3% and 25.9%±3.2%; freedom from valve-related death was 94.9%±1.5% and 92.7%±3.5%; freedom from reoperation was 92.3%±1.8% and 80.7%±5.0%; and freedom from explant owing to structural valve deterioration was 96.5%±1.3% and 83.3%±4.8%. Increased age was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality and valve-related mortality and lower risks of reoperation and explant caused by structural valve deterioration.
CONCLUSIONS: In this long-term, multicenter, observational study, the Freestyle stentless aortic root bioprosthesis offered good clinical outcomes in terms of survival, freedom from valve-related mortality, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from structural valve deterioration. The Freestyle valve is a viable option for use in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement and for anticipated desire for long-term durability.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  35

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24140209     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  15 in total

1.  Aortic Valve Reoperation After Stentless Bioprosthesis: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Himanshu J Patel; Elizabeth L Norton; Christina Debenedictus; Linda Farhat; Xiaoting Wu; Kevin He; Whitney E Hornsby; Donald S Likosky; G Michael Deeb
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  The Use of Biological Heart Valves.

Authors:  Sami Kueri; Fabian A Kari; Rafael Ayala Fuentes; Hans-Hinrich Sievers; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Wolfgang Bothe
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Morphometrical and biomechanical analyses of a stentless bioprosthetic valve: an implication to avoid potential primary tissue failure.

Authors:  Hiroki Takaya; Shinya Masuda; Masaaki Naganuma; Ichiro Yoshioka; Goro Takahashi; Masatoshi Akiyama; Osamu Adachi; Kiichiro Kumagai; Shukei Sugita; Yoshikatsu Saiki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-28

Review 4.  Biological aortic valve replacement: advantages and optimal indications of stentless compared to stented valve substitutes. A review.

Authors:  Reza Tavakoli; Pichoy Danial; Ahmed Hamid Oudjana; Peiman Jamshidi; Max Gassmann; Pascal Leprince; Guillaume Lebreton
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-01-10

Review 5.  Prosthetic cardiac valves: history and review of cardiac prostheses clinically available in Japan.

Authors:  Eiki Tayama; Kosuke Saku; Tomoyuki Anegawa; Atsunobu Oryoji; Shinya Negoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Outcomes after transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation using a balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien valve in patients with degenerated Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Christof Burgdorf; Andrijana Vukadinovikj Momchilovska; Bjoern Andrew Remppis
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

7.  Repeat Pregnancy after Prior Aortic Valve-in-Valve Replacement: A Cautionary Tale.

Authors:  Kelly Rasmussen; Roxann Rokey; Stacey C Rolak; Chuyang Zhong; John H Braxton; Kazumasa Hashimoto
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2020-09-02

8.  [Safety of biological valves for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis].

Authors:  B Q Zeng; S Q Yu; Y Chen; W Zhai; B Liu; S Y Zhan; F Sun
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-06-18

9.  Open-heart transcatheter aortic valve replacement in complex aortic valve reoperation: about a case series.

Authors:  Laury Leveille; Nicolas Jaussaud; Alexis Theron; Alberto Riberi; Frederic Collart
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2018-05-24

Review 10.  Long-term Transcatheter Aortic Valve Durability.

Authors:  Giuliano Costa; Enrico Criscione; Denise Todaro; Corrado Tamburino; Marco Barbanti
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.