Literature DB >> 32541991

[Safety of biological valves for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis].

B Q Zeng1, S Q Yu1, Y Chen1, W Zhai2, B Liu2, S Y Zhan1, F Sun1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive and contemporary overview of the long-term safety outcomes after aortic valve replacements (AVR) with conventional biological heart valve (stented or stentless).
METHODS: English databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrial.gov) and Chinese databases (CNKI, VIP, WanFang, and SinoMed) were searched systemically from January 1, 2000 to January 26, 2019. Eligible randomized controlled trials, non-randomized clinical trials, cohort studies (retrospective or prospective), and unselected case series were included. Strict screening of the obtained literature was conducted to extract relevant data by two reviewers. Other inclusion criteria were studied reporting on outcomes of AVR with biological valves (stented or stentless), with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or valve repair procedure, with mean follow-up length equal to or longer than 5 years. We excluded studies that reported only a specific patient group (e.g., patients with renal failure, or pregnancy), without the report of biological valve type, or with study population size less than 100. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 software.
RESULTS: In this study, 53 papers (in total 57 study groups) involving 47 803 patients were included. (1) The all-cause mortality was 6.33/100 patient-years (95%CI: 5.85-6.84). Subgroup analysis showed that the mortality rates of porcine and bovine valve prostheses were 5.69/100 patient-years (95%CI: 5.05-6.41) and 7.29/100 patient-years (95%CI: 6.53-8.13), respectively. The all-cause mortality rates for stented and stentless valve were 6.69/100 patient-years (95%CI: 6.12-7.30) and 5.21/100 patient-years (95%CI: 4.43-6.14), respectively. (2) The incidence rate of thromboembolism was 1.16/100 patient-years (95%CI: 0.96-1.40), the incidence rate of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation was 1.08/100 patient-years (95%CI: 0.75-1.54), the incidence rate of stroke was 0.74/100 patient-years (95%CI: 0.51-1.06), the incidence rate of structural valve dysfunction (SVD) was 0.73/100 patient-years (95%CI: 0.59-0.91), the incidence rate of major bleeding was 0.52/100 patient-years (95%CI: 0.41-0.65), the incidence rate of endocarditis was 0.38/100 patient-years (95%CI: 0.33-0.44), and the incidence rate of non-structural valve dysfunction (NSVD) was 0.20/100 patient-years (95%CI: 0.13-0.31). The total reoperation rate for biological aortic valve was 0.77/100 patient-years (95%CI: 0.65-0.91), and the SVD related reoperation rate was 0.46/100 patient-years (95%CI: 0.36-0.58).
CONCLUSION: The all-cause mortality for conventional biological AVR was 6.33/100 patient-years. Thromboembolism, PPM implantation, reoperation, stroke, and SVD were major long term complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; Bioprosthesis; Meta-analysis; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32541991      PMCID: PMC7433430          DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  52 in total

1.  Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.

Authors:  Guangqiang Gao; YingXing Wu; Gary L Grunkemeier; Anthony P Furnary; Albert Starr
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Excellent Durability of the Mosaic Porcine Aortic Bioprosthesis at Extended Follow Up.

Authors:  Michele Celiento; Giacomo Ravenni; Leonardo Tomei; Stefano Pratali; Aldo D Milano; Uberto Bortolotti
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2018-01

3.  Trends and outcomes of valve surgery: 16-year results of Netherlands Cardiac Surgery National Database.

Authors:  Sabrina Siregar; Frederiek de Heer; Rolf H H Groenwold; Michel I M Versteegh; Jos A Bekkers; Emile S Brinkman; Michiel L Bots; Yolanda van der Graaf; Lex A van Herwerden
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Rapid Deployment Versus Conventional Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Stephan Ensminger; Buntaro Fujita; Timm Bauer; Helge Möllmann; Andreas Beckmann; Raffi Bekeredjian; Sabine Bleiziffer; Sandra Landwehr; Christian W Hamm; Friedrich W Mohr; Hugo A Katus; Wolfgang Harringer; Thomas Walther; Christian Frerker
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Hancock II bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: the gold standard of bioprosthetic valves durability?

Authors:  Tirone E David; Susan Armstrong; Manjula Maganti
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Long-term clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Hancock II versus the Perimount aortic bioprostheses.

Authors:  Vincent Chan; Alexander Kulik; Anthony Tran; Paul Hendry; Roy Masters; Thierry G Mesana; Marc Ruel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Bioprosthetic heart valves: modes of failure.

Authors:  Raheela Fareed Siddiqui; Johnathan Rajiv Abraham; Jagdish Butany
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  James M Brown; Sean M O'Brien; Changfu Wu; Jo Ann H Sikora; Bartley P Griffith; James S Gammie
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Kevin D Accola; Meredith L Scott; George J Palmer; Paul A Thompson; Mark E Sand; Jorge E Suarez-Cavalier; Jeffrey N Bott; George Ebra
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2008-07

10.  Medtronic intact porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position: 13-year results.

Authors:  Hervé Corbineau; Jean-Philippe Verhoye; Arnaud Tauran; Thierry Langanay; Pascal Ménestret; Alain Leguerrier
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2002-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of risk factors for perioperative death in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement using biological valves.

Authors:  Qi Li; Hongbo Gao; Qiuxia Ji; Jianshu Song; Longfei Li; Xu Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 1.889

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.