PURPOSE: To report quality of life (QOL)/toxicity in men treated with proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer and to compare outcomes between passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT) and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with localized prostate cancer enrolled on a prospective QOL protocol with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were reviewed. Comparative groups were defined by technique (PSPT vs SSPT). Patients completed Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires at baseline and every 3-6 months after proton beam therapy. Clinically meaningful differences in QOL were defined as ≥0.5 × baseline standard deviation. The cumulative incidence of modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity and argon plasma coagulation were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 226 men received PSPT, and 65 received SSPT. Both PSPT and SSPT resulted in statistically significant changes in sexual, urinary, and bowel Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite summary scores. Only bowel summary, function, and bother resulted in clinically meaningful decrements beyond treatment completion. The decrement in bowel QOL persisted through 24-month follow-up. Cumulative grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity at 24 months were 13.4% and 9.6%, respectively. There was 1 grade 3 GI toxicity (PSPT group) and no other grade ≥3 GI or GU toxicity. Argon plasma coagulation application was infrequent (PSPT 4.4% vs SSPT 1.5%; P=.21). No statistically significant differences were appreciated between PSPT and SSPT regarding toxicity or QOL. CONCLUSION: Both PSPT and SSPT confer low rates of grade ≥2 GI or GU toxicity, with preservation of meaningful sexual and urinary QOL at 24 months. A modest, yet clinically meaningful, decrement in bowel QOL was seen throughout follow-up. No toxicity or QOL differences between PSPT and SSPT were identified. Long-term comparative results in a larger patient cohort are warranted.
PURPOSE: To report quality of life (QOL)/toxicity in men treated with proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer and to compare outcomes between passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT) and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with localized prostate cancer enrolled on a prospective QOL protocol with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were reviewed. Comparative groups were defined by technique (PSPT vs SSPT). Patients completed Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires at baseline and every 3-6 months after proton beam therapy. Clinically meaningful differences in QOL were defined as ≥0.5 × baseline standard deviation. The cumulative incidence of modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity and argon plasma coagulation were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 226 men received PSPT, and 65 received SSPT. Both PSPT and SSPT resulted in statistically significant changes in sexual, urinary, and bowel Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite summary scores. Only bowel summary, function, and bother resulted in clinically meaningful decrements beyond treatment completion. The decrement in bowel QOL persisted through 24-month follow-up. Cumulative grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity at 24 months were 13.4% and 9.6%, respectively. There was 1 grade 3 GI toxicity (PSPT group) and no other grade ≥3 GI or GU toxicity. Argon plasma coagulation application was infrequent (PSPT 4.4% vs SSPT 1.5%; P=.21). No statistically significant differences were appreciated between PSPT and SSPT regarding toxicity or QOL. CONCLUSION: Both PSPT and SSPT confer low rates of grade ≥2 GI or GU toxicity, with preservation of meaningful sexual and urinary QOL at 24 months. A modest, yet clinically meaningful, decrement in bowel QOL was seen throughout follow-up. No toxicity or QOL differences between PSPT and SSPT were identified. Long-term comparative results in a larger patient cohort are warranted.
Authors: L T Yonemoto; J D Slater; C J Rossi; J E Antoine; L Loredo; J O Archambeau; R W Schulte; D W Miller; S L Teichman; J M Slater Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1997-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: James A Talcott; Carl Rossi; William U Shipley; Jack A Clark; Jerry D Slater; Andrzej Niemierko; Anthony L Zietman Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anthony L Zietman; Michelle L DeSilvio; Jerry D Slater; Carl J Rossi; Daniel W Miller; Judith A Adams; William U Shipley Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-09-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: W U Shipley; J E Tepper; G R Prout; L J Verhey; O A Mendiondo; M Goitein; A M Koehler; H D Suit Journal: JAMA Date: 1979-05-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J R Duttenhaver; W U Shipley; T Perrone; L J Verhey; M Goitein; J E Munzenrider; G R Prout; E C Parkhurst; H D Suit Journal: Cancer Date: 1983-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Martin G Sanda; Rodney L Dunn; Jeff Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Laurel Northouse; Larry Hembroff; Xihong Lin; Thomas K Greenfield; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal; Arul Mahadevan; Eric Klein; Adam Kibel; Louis L Pisters; Deborah Kuban; Irving Kaplan; David Wood; Jay Ciezki; Nikhil Shah; John T Wei Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel A Hamstra; Anna S C Conlon; Stephanie Daignault; Rodney L Dunn; Howard M Sandler; A Larry Hembroff; Anthony L Zietman; Irving Kaplan; Jay Ciezki; Deborah A Kuban; John T Wei; Martin G Sanda; Jeff M Michalski Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Penny Fang; Rosemarie Mick; Curtiland Deville; Stefan Both; Justin E Bekelman; John P Christodouleas; Thomas J Guzzo; Zelig Tochner; Stephen M Hahn; Neha Vapiwala Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Hubert Y Pan; Jing Jiang; Karen E Hoffman; Chad Tang; Seungtaek L Choi; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; Steven J Frank; Mitchell S Anscher; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Benjamin D Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nikhil G Thaker; Tariq N Ali; Michael E Porter; Thomas W Feeley; Robert S Kaplan; Steven J Frank Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang; Timothy G Jones; Annelise Giebeler; Phillip J Taddei; Robert D Stewart; Andrew Lee; Oleg Vassiliev Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Mark V Mishra; Rahul Khairnar; Søren M Bentzen; Gary Larson; Henry Tsai; Christopher Sinesi; Carlos Vargas; George Laramore; Carl Rossi; Lane Rosen; Kai Sun; William Hartsell Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-03-07
Authors: Howard J Lee; Meghan W Macomber; Matthew B Spraker; Stephen R Bowen; Daniel S Hippe; Angela Fung; Kenneth J Russell; George E Laramore; Ramesh Rengan; Jay Liao; Smith Apisarnthanarax; Jing Zeng Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 3.481