Literature DB >> 24139077

Quality of life and toxicity from passively scattered and spot-scanning proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Thomas J Pugh1, Mark F Munsell, Seungtaek Choi, Quyhn Nhu Nguyen, Benson Mathai, X Ron Zhu, Narayan Sahoo, Michael Gillin, Jennifer L Johnson, Richard A Amos, Lei Dong, Usama Mahmood, Deborah A Kuban, Steven J Frank, Karen E Hoffman, Sean E McGuire, Andrew K Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report quality of life (QOL)/toxicity in men treated with proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer and to compare outcomes between passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT) and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with localized prostate cancer enrolled on a prospective QOL protocol with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were reviewed. Comparative groups were defined by technique (PSPT vs SSPT). Patients completed Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires at baseline and every 3-6 months after proton beam therapy. Clinically meaningful differences in QOL were defined as ≥0.5 × baseline standard deviation. The cumulative incidence of modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity and argon plasma coagulation were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: A total of 226 men received PSPT, and 65 received SSPT. Both PSPT and SSPT resulted in statistically significant changes in sexual, urinary, and bowel Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite summary scores. Only bowel summary, function, and bother resulted in clinically meaningful decrements beyond treatment completion. The decrement in bowel QOL persisted through 24-month follow-up. Cumulative grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity at 24 months were 13.4% and 9.6%, respectively. There was 1 grade 3 GI toxicity (PSPT group) and no other grade ≥3 GI or GU toxicity. Argon plasma coagulation application was infrequent (PSPT 4.4% vs SSPT 1.5%; P=.21). No statistically significant differences were appreciated between PSPT and SSPT regarding toxicity or QOL.
CONCLUSION: Both PSPT and SSPT confer low rates of grade ≥2 GI or GU toxicity, with preservation of meaningful sexual and urinary QOL at 24 months. A modest, yet clinically meaningful, decrement in bowel QOL was seen throughout follow-up. No toxicity or QOL differences between PSPT and SSPT were identified. Long-term comparative results in a larger patient cohort are warranted.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24139077      PMCID: PMC4086944          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  21 in total

1.  Combined proton and photon conformal radiation therapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate: preliminary results of a phase I/II study.

Authors:  L T Yonemoto; J D Slater; C J Rossi; J E Antoine; L Loredo; J O Archambeau; R W Schulte; D W Miller; S L Teichman; J M Slater
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Patient-reported long-term outcomes after conventional and high-dose combined proton and photon radiation for early prostate cancer.

Authors:  James A Talcott; Carl Rossi; William U Shipley; Jack A Clark; Jerry D Slater; Andrzej Niemierko; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anthony L Zietman; Michelle L DeSilvio; Jerry D Slater; Carl J Rossi; Daniel W Miller; Judith A Adams; William U Shipley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  J T Wei; R L Dunn; M S Litwin; H M Sandler; M G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Proton radiation as boost therapy for localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  W U Shipley; J E Tepper; G R Prout; L J Verhey; O A Mendiondo; M Goitein; A M Koehler; H D Suit
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-05-04       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Phase II feasibility study of high-dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer using proton boost therapy: first clinical trial of proton beam therapy for prostate cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Keiji Nihei; Takashi Ogino; Satoshi Ishikura; Mitsuhiko Kawashima; Hideki Nishimura; Satoko Arahira; Masakatsu Onozawa
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  A comparison of proton therapy and IMRT treatment plans for prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  S J Dowdell; P E Metcalfe; J E Morales; M Jackson; A B Rosenfeld
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.430

8.  Protons or megavoltage X-rays as boost therapy for patients irradiated for localized prostatic carcinoma. An early phase I/II comparison.

Authors:  J R Duttenhaver; W U Shipley; T Perrone; L J Verhey; M Goitein; J E Munzenrider; G R Prout; E C Parkhurst; H D Suit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.

Authors:  Martin G Sanda; Rodney L Dunn; Jeff Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Laurel Northouse; Larry Hembroff; Xihong Lin; Thomas K Greenfield; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal; Arul Mahadevan; Eric Klein; Adam Kibel; Louis L Pisters; Deborah Kuban; Irving Kaplan; David Wood; Jay Ciezki; Nikhil Shah; John T Wei
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Multi-institutional prospective evaluation of bowel quality of life after prostate external beam radiation therapy identifies patient and treatment factors associated with patient-reported outcomes: the PROSTQA experience.

Authors:  Daniel A Hamstra; Anna S C Conlon; Stephanie Daignault; Rodney L Dunn; Howard M Sandler; A Larry Hembroff; Anthony L Zietman; Irving Kaplan; Jay Ciezki; Deborah A Kuban; John T Wei; Martin G Sanda; Jeff M Michalski
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  15 in total

1.  Acute toxicity of image-guided hypofractionated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Koichiro Nakajima; Hiromitsu Iwata; Hiroyuki Ogino; Yukiko Hattori; Shingo Hashimoto; Mikiko Nakanishi; Toshiyuki Toshito; Yukihiro Umemoto; Shoichiro Iwatsuki; Yuta Shibamoto; Jun-Etsu Mizoe
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A case-matched study of toxicity outcomes after proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Penny Fang; Rosemarie Mick; Curtiland Deville; Stefan Both; Justin E Bekelman; John P Christodouleas; Thomas J Guzzo; Zelig Tochner; Stephen M Hahn; Neha Vapiwala
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Comparative Toxicities and Cost of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Proton Radiation, and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Among Younger Men With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hubert Y Pan; Jing Jiang; Karen E Hoffman; Chad Tang; Seungtaek L Choi; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; Steven J Frank; Mitchell S Anscher; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Communicating Value in Health Care Using Radar Charts: A Case Study of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Nikhil G Thaker; Tariq N Ali; Michael E Porter; Thomas W Feeley; Robert S Kaplan; Steven J Frank
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Towards Achieving the Full Clinical Potential of Proton Therapy by Inclusion of LET and RBE Models.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Reducing the cost of proton radiation therapy: the feasibility of a streamlined treatment technique for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang; Timothy G Jones; Annelise Giebeler; Phillip J Taddei; Robert D Stewart; Andrew Lee; Oleg Vassiliev
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Patient reported outcomes following proton pencil beam scanning vs. passive scatter/uniform scanning for localized prostate cancer: Secondary analysis of PCG 001-09.

Authors:  Mark V Mishra; Rahul Khairnar; Søren M Bentzen; Gary Larson; Henry Tsai; Christopher Sinesi; Carlos Vargas; George Laramore; Carl Rossi; Lane Rosen; Kai Sun; William Hartsell
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-03-07

8.  Health-related quality of life in Japanese patients with prostate cancer following proton beam therapy: an institutional cohort study.

Authors:  Kyoko Matsukawa; Takeshi Arimura; Makiko Orita; Hisayoshi Kondo; Ikuko Chuman; Takashi Ogino; Yasuyuki Taira; Takashi Kudo; Noboru Takamura
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Early toxicity and patient reported quality-of-life in patients receiving proton therapy for localized prostate cancer: a single institutional review of prospectively recorded outcomes.

Authors:  Howard J Lee; Meghan W Macomber; Matthew B Spraker; Stephen R Bowen; Daniel S Hippe; Angela Fung; Kenneth J Russell; George E Laramore; Ramesh Rengan; Jay Liao; Smith Apisarnthanarax; Jing Zeng
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Sophie Mangan; Michelle Leech
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.