Literature DB >> 16160131

Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial.

Anthony L Zietman1, Michelle L DeSilvio, Jerry D Slater, Carl J Rossi, Daniel W Miller, Judith A Adams, William U Shipley.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Clinically localized prostate cancer is very prevalent among US men, but recurrence after treatment with conventional radiation therapy is common.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hypothesis that increasing the radiation dose delivered to men with clinically localized prostate cancer improves disease outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled trial of 393 patients with stage T1b through T2b prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels less than 15 ng/mL randomized between January 1996 and December 1999 and treated at 2 US academic institutions. Median age was 67 years and median PSA level was 6.3 ng/mL. Median follow-up was 5.5 (range, 1.2-8.2) years. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive external beam radiation to a total dose of either 70.2 Gy (conventional dose) or 79.2 Gy (high dose). This was delivered using a combination of conformal photon and proton beams. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Increasing PSA level (ie, biochemical failure) 5 years after treatment.
RESULTS: The proportions of men free from biochemical failure at 5 years were 78.8% [corrected] (95% confidence interval, 73.1%-84.6%) [corrected] for conventional-dose and 91.3% [corrected] (95% confidence interval, 87.2%-95.4%) [corrected] for high-dose therapy (P<.001), a 59% [corrected] reduction in the risk of failure. The advantage to high-dose therapy was statistically significant [corrected] in both the low-risk subgroup [corrected] (risk reduction, 84% [P<.001]) [corrected] There has been no significant difference in overall survival rates between the treatment groups. Only 1% of patients receiving conventional-dose and 2% receiving high-dose radiation experienced acute urinary or rectal morbidity of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 3 or greater. So far, only 2% and 1%, respectively, have experienced late morbidity of RTOG grade 3 or greater.
CONCLUSIONS: Men with clinically localized prostate cancer have a lower risk of biochemical failure if they receive high-dose rather than conventional-dose conformal radiation. This advantage was achieved without any associated increase in RTOG grade 3 acute or late urinary or rectal morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16160131     DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  290 in total

1.  Motion-compensated estimation of delivered dose during external beam radiation therapy: implementation in Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system.

Authors:  Shyam Bharat; Parag Parikh; Camille Noel; Michael Meltsner; Karl Bzdusek; Michael Kaus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  High-risk prostate cancer: is androgen deprivation monotherapy still appropriate?

Authors:  Vahakn B Shahinian
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Be it resolved that in the modern era, the best method for dose escalation is brachytherapy: The con position.

Authors:  D Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Prostate cancer screening: facts, statistics, and interpretation in response to the US Preventive Services Task Force Review.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Andrew J Vickers; Monique Roobol; James Eastham; Peter Scardino; Hans Lilja; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Technological advances in radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mehee Choi; Arthur Y Hung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Combining radiation therapy and androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer-a critical review.

Authors:  A Dal Pra; F L Cury; L Souhami
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  SEOM clinical guidelines for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  José Ángel Arranz Arija; Javier Cassinello Espinosa; Miguel Ángel Climent Durán; Fernando Rivero Herrero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Improved survival with the addition of radiotherapy to androgen deprivation: questions answered and a review of current controversies in radiotherapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Arya Amini; Brian D Kavanagh; Chad G Rusthoven
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

9.  The impact of dose-escalated radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation for prostate cancer using 2 linked nomograms.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Niraj H Pahlajani; Brian L Egleston; Mark K Buyyounouski; David Y T Chen; Eric M Horwitz; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Radiation-induced acid ceramidase confers prostate cancer resistance and tumor relapse.

Authors:  Joseph C Cheng; Aiping Bai; Thomas H Beckham; S Tucker Marrison; Caroline L Yount; Katherine Young; Ping Lu; Anne M Bartlett; Bill X Wu; Barry J Keane; Kent E Armeson; David T Marshall; Thomas E Keane; Michael T Smith; E Ellen Jones; Richard R Drake; Alicja Bielawska; James S Norris; Xiang Liu
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.