| Literature DB >> 24138407 |
Deying Sun, Jiaqi Zhu, Lei Fang, Xin Zhang, Yvonne Chow, Jianhua Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24138407 PMCID: PMC4050207 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Characterization of growth, gametogenesis, and lipid content in . (A) B. sudeticus culture reaches relatively high maximal cell density. Growth curves of B. sudeticus (in red) and C. reinhardtii (in black) in various media indicated are shown. X- and Y-axis indicate time (in day) and cell dry weight (CDW; in g/L), respectively. HS and BB stand for High Salt and Bold-modified Bristol media, respectively. Error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate samples. (B) Gametogenesis is induced by ND in B. sudeticus. Upper panel shows a gamete whose tip of flagella is denoted by an arrow. Bottom panel shows part of conical flasks in which sedimented cell aggregates are denoted by an arrow-head. Medium with nitrogen (+N2) or without nitrogen (-N2) is indicated. (C) Lipid accumulation is enhanced by ND in B. sudeticus. Left panel shows the increased intensity of Nile red signal in cells after ND. X- and Y-axis indicate the time (in day) and Nile red signal level (in arbitrary units), respectively. Nile red signal level of cell samples are based on the median level derived from FACS analysis as shown in the mid panel. Right panel shows the Nile red stained cells prior to (+N2) and after (-N2) ND. (D) Level of triacylglycerol (TAG) and squalene is increased in B. sudeticus following ND. Left panel shows the TLC analysis and right panel shows the GC-MS analysis (MS result is not shown) of total lipid in B. sudeticus prior to (+N2) and after (-N2) ND. (E) Contents of nitrogen (N), carbon (C), and total lipid (TL). Bar-plots show the level of N, C, and TL against CDW in nitrogen-replete (+N2) and nitrogen-starved (-N2) cells.
Figure 2Characteristics of the transcriptome. A total of 56 thousand ESTs is assembled based on 53 million paired-end reads (90 bp in length), of which, ~7,600 ESTs were annotated. (A) Length distribution of all ESTs. X- and Y-axis indicate the binned EST length and the number of ESTs in each bin, respectively. (B) Level distribution of all ESTs. Levels are normalized to RPKM. X- and Y-axis indicate the binned EST level (in RPKM) and the number of ESTs in each bin, respectively. (C) List of GO-terms that are associated with ESTs annotations. Top 10 GO-terms in each category are shown. X-axis indicates the GO-terms and Y-axis indicates the number of ESTs associated with the GO-terms. BP, CC, and MF stand for biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, respectively. (D) List of KEGG metabolic pathways that are associated with ESTs annotations. Top 30 metabolic pathways are listed. The display is identical to (C).
List of the top 30 most abundant ESTs in
| Rka | EIDb | Level | Ratio | Genome | PIDc | Descriptiond |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3556 | 4.03 | -0.50 | Chlre4 | 376403 | |
| 2 | 318 | 3.98 | -0.24 | Chlre4 | 322197 | RP-S29e, RPS29; small subunit ribosomal protein S29e |
| 3 | 5 | 3.81 | 0.20 | Chlre4 | 395228 | |
| 4 | 36952 | 3.78 | 0.16 | ChlNC64A | 28889 | |
| 5 | 106 | 3.70 | -0.04 | Chlre4 | 155068 | |
| 6 | 57 | 3.69 | 0.18 | Chlre4 | 407233 | Glucan1,4-alpha-glucosidase. |
| 7 | 8 | 3.67 | -0.21 | Chlre4 | 195592 | RP-S20e, RPS20; small subunit ribosomal protein S20e |
| 8 | 520 | 3.65 | -0.03 | Chlre4 | 195131 | RP-L22e, RPL22; large subunit ribosomal protein L22e |
| 9 | 127 | 3.62 | 0.05 | Chlre4 | 418234 | |
| 10 | 142 | 3.61 | -0.06 | Chlre4 | 128309 | RP-L44e, RPL44; large subunit ribosomal protein L44e |
| 11 | 512 | 3.56 | -0.12 | Chlre4 | 194928 | RP-L38e, RPL38; large subunit ribosomal protein L38e |
| 12 | 181 | 3.50 | 0.10 | Chlre4 | 127247 | RP-L35Ae, RPL35A; large subunit ribosomal protein L35Ae |
| 13 | 633 | 3.45 | -0.33 | Chlre4 | 206640 | rbcS; ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase small chain[EC:4.1.1.39] |
| 14 | 316 | 3.41 | 0.00 | Chlre4 | 129742 | RP-S21e, RPS21; small subunit ribosomal protein S21e |
| 15 | 31 | 3.38 | 0.05 | Chlre4 | 57302 | RP-S25e, RPS25; small subunit ribosomal protein S25e |
| 16 | 9 | 3.30 | -0.26 | Chlre4 | 166012 | RP-L30e, RPL30; large subunit ribosomal protein L30e |
| 17 | 311 | 3.26 | 0.09 | Chlre4 | 191758 | RP-L32e, RPL32; large subunit ribosomal protein L32e |
| 18 | 1207 | 3.26 | 0.16 | ChlNC64A | 144034 | |
| 19 | 114 | 3.23 | -0.33 | Chlre4 | 344365 | |
| 20 | 590 | 3.19 | -0.18 | Chlre4 | 195601 | RP-S17e, RPS17; small subunit ribosomal protein S17e |
| 21 | 1921 | 3.18 | 0.21 | Chlre4 | 195587 | RP-L11e, RPL11; large subunit ribosomal protein L11e |
| 22 | 287 | 3.17 | -0.06 | Chlre4 | 292191 | |
| 23 | 282 | 3.16 | -0.41 | Chlre4 | 195585 | RP-L10Ae, RPL10A; large subunit ribosomal protein L10Ae |
| 24 | 50 | 3.16 | -0.84 | Chlre4 | 156131 | TC.AMT; ammonium transporter, Amt family |
| 25 | 20 | 3.15 | 0.45 | Chlre4 | 120079 | SIRT2, SIR2L2; NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 2 [EC:3.5.1.-]; in linear amides. |
| 26 | 1000 | 3.14 | -0.26 | Chlre4 | 126853 | RP-L37Ae, RPL37A; large subunit ribosomal protein L37Ae |
| 27 | 480 | 3.14 | -0.16 | Chlre4 | 78109 | RP-L31e, RPL31; large subunit ribosomal protein L31e |
| 28 | 296 | 3.12 | -0.24 | Chlre4 | 36709 | |
| 29 | 278 | 3.12 | 0.01 | Chlre4 | 145271 | RP-L14e, RPL14; large subunit ribosomal protein L14e |
| 30 | 545 | 3.11 | -0.07 | Chlre4 | 153674 |
Note: a, rank; b, EST ID; c, Protein ID in C. reinhardtii or C. variabilis; d, EST function based on its best hit protein.
Figure 3Coherence of transcription levels in ribosomal protein-encoding ESTs in . (A) Distribution of ESTs encoding eRPs and aRPs based on rank by level. The heat-map shows the EST occurrence that is binned by an average sliding window of 11 consecutive ranks and normalized to 1 for each pathway or component. The color key for percent levels is shown at the bottom. The box-plot indicates the minimum (min), first quartile (q1), median (mid), third quartile (q3), and maximum (max) of eRP and aRP EST levels by rank. (B) Occurrence densities of eRP and aRP ESTs. Upper table shows the range of ESTs based on rank by level. Four ranges are shown: first 50% (R-F50), middle 50% (R-M50), and second 50% (R-S50) of eRP- or aRP-ESTs and top 10% (R-Top) of most abundant ESTs based on rank by level. Mid table shows the occurrence density of eRP- or aRP-ESTs. Bottom table shows the relative occurrence density in 3 half-ranges containing 50% of the eRP or aRP-ESTs. Coherent transcription or relative density in one of the 3 half-ranges is 2-fold above background and p-value is less than 0.05. Different levels of statistical significance are indicated as triple asterisk (***), double asterisk (**), and single asterisk (*) for p-value < 0.001, < 0.01, and < 0.05, respectively. (C) Distribution of eRP- and aRP-ESTs based on rank by ratio. Top panel shows the heat-map and box-plot of eRP- and aRP-EST distribution based on rank by ratio. Bottom table shows the relative occurrence density of eRP- and aRP-ESTs in 3 half-ranges and in top or bottom of the most differentially transcribed ESTs. Levels of statistical significance are indicated as (B). (D) Distribution of eRP- and aRP-EST ratios. Change of median ratios (ΔM) of eRP- and aRP-ESTs compared to background is indicated.
Figure 4Coherence of transcription levels in various metabolic pathways in rapidly growing cells. (A) Distribution of pathway-associated ESTs based on rank by level. Left panel shows the heat-map of individual EST occurrence based on rank by level. Classes of metabolic pathways are indicated on the far left. Numbers of ESTs associated with the pathway is shown in parentheses. RP stands for ribosomal proteins as control (e.g., C1 or C2). Right panel shows the relative occurrence density in the 3 half-ranges (F for first 50%, M for middle 50%, and S for second 50%) of the pathway-associated ESTs and in the range of top 10% of the most abundant ESTs (i.e., T). Metabolic pathways are numbered on the far right. (B) Coherently transcribed metabolic pathways in rapidly growing B. sudeticus cells. Distribution of metabolic pathway-associated ESTs displaying the enriched level (i.e., 2-fold above background; p-value < 0.05) in one of the 3 half-ranges (F, M, or S) is shown. Level of statistical significance is indicated by triple asterisk (***), double asterisk (**), and single asterisk (*) for p-value < 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively.
Figure 5Coherence of transcriptional alterations in various metabolic pathways in cells following ND. (A) Distribution of pathway-associated ESTs based on rank by ratio. The display is identical to Figure 4A. Relative occurrence density in the top10 % and bottom 10% of the most differentially transcribed ESTs is denoted as T and B, respectively. (B) Coherently responsive metabolic pathways in B. sudeticus cells following ND. The display is identical to Figure 4B. (C) Distribution of pathway-associated EST ratios. The display is identical to Figure 3D. Asterisk indicates the level of statistical significance. (D) Levels of chlorophyll content (upper panel) and efficiency of quantum yield of photosystem II (bottom panel).
Figure 6Coherently transcribed metabolic pathways in rapid growing or cells. (A) Correlation between EST levels based on rank by level in B. sudeticus (i.e., Bs) and C. reinhardtii by Miller et al., (i.e., Cr-M) and by Gonzalez-Ballester et al. (i.e., Cr-GB). Correlation coefficient is shown. (B) Relative occurrence density of various pathway-associated ESTs based on rank by level in B. sudeticus and C. reinhardtii. The display is identical to the right panel in Figure 4A. (C) Common consistently transcribed pathways in B. sudeticus and C. reinhardtii. The display is identical to right panel in Figure 4B. Datasets based on B. sudeticus (Bs) and C. reinhardtii by Miller et al. (Cr-M) and Gonzalez-Ballester et al. (Cr-GB) are indicated. (D) Unique consistently transcribed pathways in B. sudeticus or C. reinhardtii. The display is identical to (C).
Figure 7Coherently responsive metabolic pathways in or following nutrient deprivation. (A) Correlation between EST ratios in B. sudeticus (i.e., Bs) and C. reinhardtii (i.e., Cr-M) following ND and C. reinhardtii (i.e., Cr-GB) following sulfur deprivation (or SD). Correlation coefficient based on EST ratios is shown. (B) Relative occurrence density of various pathway-associated ESTs based on rank by ratio. The display is identical to the right panel in Figure 5A. (C) Correlation between median ratios of various metabolic pathway-associated ESTs based on rank by ratio in B. sudeticus and C. reinhardtii following nutrient deprivation. (D) Common consistently responsive pathways in B. sudeticus and C. reinhardtii following ND. The display of the upper and bottom panels is identical to right panel in Figure 5B and Figure 5C, respectively. (E) Unique consistently responsive pathways in B. sudeticus and C. reinhardtii following nutrient deprivation. The display is identical to (D).