| Literature DB >> 30978248 |
Izabela Świetlicka1, Ewa Tomaszewska2, Siemowit Muszyński1, Jose Luis Valverde Piedra3, Michał Świetlicki4, Adam Prószyński4, Krystian Cieślak5, Dariusz Wiącek6, Sylwia Szymańczyk2, Daniel Kamiński7.
Abstract
Alterations in the structure and mechanical properties of teeth in adult Wistar rats exposed to cadmium were investigated. Analyses were conducted on two sets of incisors from female and male specimens, that were intoxicated with cadmium (n = 12) or belonged to the control (n = 12). The cadmium group was administered with CdCl2 dissolved in drinking water with a dose of 4mg/kgbw for 10 weeks. The oral intake of cadmium by adult rats led to the range of structural changes in enamel morphology and its mechanical features. A significant increase of cadmium levels in the teeth in comparison to the control, a slight shift in the colour and reduction of pigmented enamel length, higher surface irregularity, a decrease of hydroxyapatite crystals size in the c-axis and simultaneous increase in pigmented enamel hardness were observed. The extent of these changes was sex-dependent and was more pronounced in males.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30978248 PMCID: PMC6461291 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Incisor with marked crown and root, area of sample collection and approximation of incisor curvature by homocentric circles with outer Rout and inner Rin radiuses.
Fig 2Incisor preparation for X-ray diffraction (a) and XRD measurements (b).
Limits of detection and recovery efficiency for the examined elements.
| Element | Coefficient of correlation r | Limit of detection LOD [μg/L] | Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | 0.9985 | 0.002 | 105 |
| Cd | 0.9999 | 0.001 | 97 |
| Cu | 0.9999 | 0.002 | 103 |
| Fe | 0.9998 | 0.021 | 96 |
| Mg | 0.9953 | 0.005 | 104 |
| P | 0.9997 | 0.120 | 103 |
| Zn | 0.9998 | 0.010 | 102 |
Fig 3Mean values of CIE Lab colour space parameters with their standard deviations.
Statistically significant differences are marked with #—significant difference between the control and the cadmium group according to the sex (p < 0.05), *–significant difference between sexes in the control and the cadmium group (p < 0.05). c–control group, Cd–cadmium group M–male, F–female L*–lightness, a*–green/red coordinate, b*–yellow/blue coordinate, C–chroma, h–hue Pigmented enamel colour parameters with a corresponding descriptive statistics–see S1 Table.
ΔE (bottom left) and NBS values (upper right) calculated for CIE Lab colour space.
Differences between the control and the cadmium groups are presented on the grey background.
| Control | Cadmium | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | M | F | ||
| Control | M | - | 6.35 | 2.36 | 5.42 |
| F | 5.84 | - | 7.05 | 0.92 | |
| Cadmium | M | 2.57 | 7.66 | - | 7.50 |
| F | 5.90 | 1.00 | 6.90 | - | |
M–male, F–female
Mean values of mass, thickness, length, roughness, hardness and fracture force calculated for the enamel surface for the control and the cadmium group with corresponding post-hoc analysis results.
| m | T | L | Sa | Sq | H | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c | 0.111 | 2.77 | 14.95 | 98.83 | 122.11 | 3.75 | 121.58 |
| Cd | 0.107 | 2.72 | 14.41 | 127.98 | 145.92 | 4.09 | 134.96 |
| M | 0.124 | 2.86 | 14.07 | 128.62 | 141.74 | 3.94 | 158.12 |
| F | 0.097 | 2.65 | 14.33 | 99.46 | 121.87 | 3.88 | 105.07 |
| M c | 0.129 | 2.89 | 15.77 | 99.75 | 124.35 | 3.59 | 139.45 |
| F c | 0.098 | 2.68 | 14.37 | 97.76 | 119.54 | 3.51 | 109.08 |
| M Cd | 0.120 | 2.84 | 14.52 | 157.45 | 171.60 | 4.07 | 172.64c |
| F Cd | 0.097 | 2.62 | 14.29 | 101.15 | 124.20 | 4.10 | 101.05 |
| group | 0.056 | 0.199 | 0.030 | 0.111 | 0.087 | 0.027 | 0.131 |
| sex | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0.089 | 0.088 | 0.899 | <0.001 |
| group × sex | 0.040 | 0.988 | 0.054 | 0.034 | 0.043 | 0.829 | 0.002 |
c–control, Cd–cadmium group
M–male, F–female
a, b, c–groups which do not differ at p < 0.05
m–mass, T–thickness, L–pigmented enamel length, Sa−average roughness, Sq−root mean square roughness, H–hardness, F–fracture force.
Mean values with a corresponding descriptive statistics–see S2 Table.
Fig 4AFM scans of enamel surface in height (I) and magnitude (II) domains and corresponding SEM images (III) for female control (a), female cadmium group (b), male control (c) and male cadmium group (d).
Fig 5AFM phase images of enamel surface for the male control (a) and the cadmium exposed group (b), and for the female control (c) and the cadmium group (d).
Fig 6Average height profiles of tooth’s enamel surface for the control and cadmium groups according to the sex.
c–control, Cd–cadmium group, M–male, F–female.
Fig 7X-ray diffraction pattern of enamel HA crystals with marked reflection peaks measured from a single tooth (a) and mean crystal size of HA crystallites in c-axis with corresponding standard deviations (b) in examined groups and according to sex. c–control, Cd–cadmium exposed group, M–male, F–female.
Mineral content in analysed teeth divided according to group, sex and sample location with the corresponding results of post-hoc analysis.
| Treatment | Ca | Cd | Cu | Fe | Mg | P | Zn | Ca/P | Cd/Ca (·10−7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c | 233240 | 0.047 | 0.705 | 185.40 | 10720 | 123252 | 110.09 | 1.899 | 1.986 |
| Cd | 228600 | 1.253 | 0.927 | 206.00 | 10113 | 122108 | 124.52 | 1.876 | 51.838 |
| M | 233336 | 1.001 | 0.605 | 175.25 | 11654 | 122822 | 109.34 | 1.901 | 39.286 |
| F | 228589 | 0.373 | 1.023 | 215.55 | 9211 | 122519 | 125.56 | 1.864 | 15.962 |
| crown | 2419123 | 1.997 | 0.755 | 303.19 | 12034 | 127706 | 120.68 | 1.894 | 82.236 |
| root | 225829 | 0.052 | 0.848 | 146.80 | 9669 | 120366 | 115.98 | 1.876 | 2.326 |
| M c crown | 248150 | 0.067 | 0.707 | 279.40 | 12630 | 130050 | 107.78 | 1.909 | 2.716 |
| M c root | 229933 | 0.022 | 0.431 | 125.04 | 11380 | 119689 | 98.02 | 1.921 | 0,978 |
| F c crown | 238950 | 0.126 | 0.807 | 332.75 | 11490 | 129225 | 126.75 | 1.849 | 5.258 |
| F c root | 226650 | 0.025 | 0.962 | 132.48 | 8638 | 120875 | 116.50 | 1.875 | 1.086 |
| M Cd crown | 244325 | 5.780 | 0.604 | 287.65 | 12783 | 126950 | 125.93 | 1.924 | 235.453 |
| M Cd root | 224538 | 0.058 | 0.749 | 123.23 | 10924 | 120675 | 113.53 | 1.861 | 2.585 |
| F Cd crown | 236225 | 2.013 | 0.901 | 312.98 | 11235 | 124600 | 122.25 | 1.896 | 85.516 |
| F Cd root | 222510 | 0.094 | 1.210 | 196.69 | 7949 | 120320 | 133.67 | 1.849 | 2.322 |
| group | 0.038 | <0.001 | 0.093 | 0.292 | 0.205 | 0.029 | 0.058 | 0.587 | <0.001 |
| sex | 0.009 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.470 | 0.017 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| sample location | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.309 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.338 | 0.109 | <0.001 |
| group × sex | 0.777 | <0.001 | 0.702 | 0.430 | 0.513 | 0.346 | 0.338 | 0.145 | <0.001 |
| group × sample location | 0.719 | <0.001 | 0.082 | 0.128 | 0.288 | 0.015 | 0.385 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| sex × sample location | 0.154 | <0.001 | 0.073 | 0.963 | 0.003 | 0.220 | 0.288 | 0.505 | <0.001 |
| group × sex × sample location | 0.985 | <0.001 | 0.413 | 0.055 | 0.857 | 0.996 | 0.268 | 0.943 | <0.001 |
c–control, Cd–cadmium group
M–male, F–female
a, b, c, d–groups which do not differ at p < 0.05
Mean values of mineral content according to group, sex and tooth’s fragment with corresponding descriptive statistics–see S3 Table.