| Literature DB >> 24130719 |
Lord Wasim Reza1, Srinath Satyanarayna, Donald A Enarson, Ajay M V Kumar, Karuna Sagili, Sujeet Kumar, Levi Anand Prabhakar, N M Devendrappa, Ashish Pandey, Nevin Wilson, Sarabjit Chadha, Badri Thapa, Kuldeep Singh Sachdeva, Mohan P Kohli.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Light-emitting diode fluorescence microscopy (LED-FM) has been shown to be more sensitive than conventional bright field microscopy using Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain in detecting sputum smear positive tuberculosis in controlled laboratory conditions. In 2012, Auramine O staining based LED-FM replaced conventional ZN microscopy in 200 designated microscopy centres (DMC) of medical colleges operating in collaboration with India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme. We aimed to assess the impact of introduction of LED-FM services on sputum smear positive case detection under program conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24130719 PMCID: PMC3794029 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Guidelines for reporting sputum smear results adopted by Revised National TB Control Programme in India.
| IUATLD/WHO scale(1000× field = HPF) Grades | Ziehl Neelsen (ZN) staining based bright fieldmicroscopy(1000X magnification: 1length = 2 cm = 100 HPF) | LED Fluorescence based sputum smearmicroscopy (400X Magnification: 1length = 40 fields = 200 HPF) |
| Negative | Zero AFB/1 length | Zero AFB/1 length |
| Scanty | 1–9 AFB/1 length or 100 HPF | 1–19 AFB/1 length |
| 1+ grade | 10–99 AFB/1 length or 100 HPF | 20–199 AFB/1 length |
| 2+ grade | 1–10 AFB/1 HPF on Average | 5–50 AFB/1 field on Average |
| 3+ grade | >10 AFB/1 HPF on Average | >50 AFB/1 field on Average |
Sputum smear examination results in selected control and medical college (intervention)microscopy centres in India, before (July–December 2011) and after (July–December 2012) introduction of LED-FM.
| Yield of positives | |||||
| DMC type | Year/Type | Examined | Number | % | P value |
| Control DMC | 2011/ZN | 16,531 | 2,152 | 13.0 | 0.31 |
| 2012/ZN | 16,403 | 2,064 | 12.6 | ||
| MedicalCollege DMC | 2011/ZN | 25,159 | 3,432 | 13.6 | <0.01 |
| 2012/LED-FM | 26,426 | 4706 | 17.8 | ||
Those who underwent both sputum examinations,
Chi-square test,
ZN = Ziehl Neelsen staining microscopy; LED-FM = Light Emitting Diode fluorescence microscopy.
Sputum smear examination results, by age and sex, in selected medical college microscopy centres in India, before (July–December 2011) and after (July–December 2012) introduction of LED-FM.
| Characteristic | 2011, ZN Microscopy | 2012, LED Microscopy | Change | ||||||||
| Yield of positives | Yield of positives | ||||||||||
| Examined | Number | % | Examined | Number | % | Total | % | (95% CI) | p-value | ||
|
| 25,159 | 3432 | 13.6 | 26,426 | 4,706 | 17.8 | 4.2 | 30 | (26–33) | <0.01 | |
|
|
| 16,576 | 2510 | 15.1 | 17,435 | 3,398 | 19.5 | 4.4 | 29 | (23–34) | <0.01 |
|
| 8550 | 918 | 10.7 | 8950 | 1306 | 14.6 | 3.9 | 36 | (27–45) | <0.01 | |
|
| 33 | 4 | 12.1 | 41 | 2 | 4.8 | −7.3 | −60 | (−167–47) | 0.29 | |
|
|
| 1038 | 52 | 5.0 | 1,109 | 83 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 49 | (9–90) | 0.03 |
|
| 3255 | 597 | 18.3 | 3,535 | 811 | 22.9 | 4.6 | 25 | (15–36) | <0.01 | |
|
| 3785 | 592 | 15.6 | 4,014 | 780 | 19.4 | 3.8 | 24 | (13–35) | <0.01 | |
|
| 4257 | 668 | 15.7 | 4,527 | 899 | 19.9 | 4.2 | 27 | (16–27) | <0.01 | |
|
| 4703 | 731 | 15.5 | 4,869 | 927 | 19.0 | 3.5 | 23 | (13–32) | <0.01 | |
|
| 4218 | 499 | 11.8 | 4,388 | 749 | 17.1 | 5.2 | 44 | (32–57) | <0.01 | |
|
| 3535 | 275 | 7.8 | 3,565 | 449 | 12.6 | 4.8 | 62 | (44–80) | <0.01 | |
|
| 368 | 18 | 4.9 | 419 | 8 | 1.9 | −3.0 | −61 | (−113–8) | 0.02 | |
Chi-square test; ZN = Ziehl Neelsen staining microscopy; LED-FM = Light Emitting Diode fluorescence microscopy.
Sputum smear examination results, by smear grading, in selected medical college Designated microscopy centres in India, before (July–December 2011) and after (July–December 2012) introduction of LED-FM.
| Highest Grade of patient | ZN Microscopy 2011 | LED-FM 2012 | Change | ||
| Number | % | Number | % | % | |
| Negatives | 21727 | 86.4 | 21720 | 82.2 | −4.9 |
| Scanty | 377 | 1.5 | 777 | 2.9 | 93.3 |
| 1+ Positive | 1036 | 4.1 | 1236 | 4.7 | 14.6 |
| 2+ Positive | 714 | 2.8 | 886 | 3.4 | 21.4 |
| 3+ Positive | 1305 | 5.2 | 1807 | 6.8 | 30.8 |
| Total | 25159 | 100 | 26426 | 100 | |
Chi square test = 57.69 (df-3, for positive grades) p-value <0.001; ZN = Ziehl Neelsen staining microscopy; LED-FM = Light Emitting Diode fluorescence microscopy.