Literature DB >> 24129976

Preference weights for chemotherapy side effects from the perspective of women with breast cancer.

I Kuchuk1, N Bouganim, K Beusterien, J Grinspan, L Vandermeer, S Gertler, S F Dent, X Song, R Segal, S Mazzarello, F Crawley, G Dranitsaris, M Clemons.   

Abstract

Perceptions among women with breast cancer about the relative importance of different potential chemotherapy side effects is not well understood. A survey was performed by women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Grade I/II (mild to moderate) and III/IV (moderate to severe) descriptions of nine common chemotherapy side effects were assigned preference weights using the standard gamble technique. For each hypothetical side effect, patients could choose to stay in the respective side effect state or take a gamble between full health (probability p) or being dead (1 - p). For each side effect, p was varied until the patient was indifferent between these options. The survey also included questions about the importance of survival, slowing cancer growth, and quality of life. This analysis included 69 patients; mean age 54 years (range 35-84), representing all cancer stages. Standard gamble preferences were lowest (i.e., least preferred) for grade III/IV nausea/vomiting (0.621), indicating that patients would, on average, risk a 38 % chance of being dead to avoid having grade III/IV nausea/vomiting for the rest of their lives. The next least preferred side effects were grade III/IV diarrhea (0.677) and grade III/IV sensory neuropathy (0.694). Survival appeared more important than slowing cancer growth and maintaining quality of life across cancer stages. Nevertheless, patients with advanced disease placed less importance on survival (p = 0.09) and higher importance on quality of life (p = 0.05). These standard gamble utilities provide unique insights into chemotherapy toxicities from the patient perspective. Differences in the relative importance of overall survival and quality of life with treatment existed between patients with different stages of disease. These studies should be expanded as the data may also be used to calculate quality-adjusted life expectancy in cost-effectiveness evaluations of breast cancer chemotherapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24129976     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2727-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  36 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal symptoms are associated with trajectories of chemotherapy-induced nausea.

Authors:  Komal Singh; Kord M Kober; Steven M Paul; Marilyn Hammer; Fay Wright; Yvette P Conley; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Authors:  A A Joy; M Ghosh; R Fernandes; M J Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Impact of CINV in earlier cycles on CINV and chemotherapy regimen modification in subsequent cycles in Asia Pacific clinical practice.

Authors:  Hoon-Kyo Kim; RueyKuen Hsieh; Alexandre Chan; Shiying Yu; Baohui Han; Yunong Gao; Ana Baños; Xiaoyan Ying; Thomas A Burke; Dorothy M K Keefe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Analysis of pharmacogenomic factors for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.

Authors:  Daiki Tsuji; Megumi Matsumoto; Yohei Kawasaki; Yong-I L Kim; Keisuke Yamamoto; Hidenori Nakamichi; Yuri Sahara; Ryo Makuta; Mari Yokoi; Takehiro Miyagi; Kunihiko Itoh
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  A cost-utility analysis of risk model-guided versus physician's choice antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a net benefit regression approach.

Authors:  Kednapa Thavorn; Doug Coyle; Jeffrey S Hoch; Lisa Vandermeer; Sasha Mazzarello; Zhou Wang; George Dranitsaris; Dean Fergusson; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Defining optimal control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting-based on patients' experience.

Authors:  Catalina Hernandez Torres; Sasha Mazzarello; Terry Ng; George Dranitsaris; Brian Hutton; Stephanie Smith; Amy Munro; Carmel Jacobs; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Targets for Neoadjuvant Therapy - The Preferences of Patients with Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  M Thill; G Pisa; G Isbary
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Practice Patterns for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Antiemetic Guideline Adherence Based on Real-World Prescribing Data.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Florian Scotté; Yolanda Escobar; Luigi Celio; Richard Berman; Alessandra Franceschetti; Danielle Bell; Karin Jordan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-03-17

9.  Effect of endurance for adverse drug reactions on the preference for aggressive treatments in cancer patients.

Authors:  Naomi Iihara; Takayuki Nishio; Tetsuko Goda; Hideaki Anzai; Masatoshi Kagawa; Hitoshi Houchi; Yutaka Kirino
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Treatment of taxane acute pain syndrome (TAPS) in cancer patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy-a systematic review.

Authors:  Ricardo Fernandes; Sasha Mazzarello; Habeeb Majeed; Stephanie Smith; Risa Shorr; Brian Hutton; Mohammed Fk Ibrahim; Carmel Jacobs; Michael Ong; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.