Literature DB >> 25294657

Effect of endurance for adverse drug reactions on the preference for aggressive treatments in cancer patients.

Naomi Iihara1, Takayuki Nishio, Tetsuko Goda, Hideaki Anzai, Masatoshi Kagawa, Hitoshi Houchi, Yutaka Kirino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy will sometimes conceal their discomfort, but an excessive endurance for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can lead to a poorer prognosis. The aim of this study was to clarify the association between ADR endurance and a preference of cancer patients for aggressive treatments.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was undertaken of inpatients under 75 years of age receiving injectable systemic chemotherapy or oral chronic medications at hospitals in Japan. Subjects were asked to respond to a validated questionnaire to assess the extent of their ADR endurance and whether they would choose a novel, more aggressive therapy if their life expectancy was estimated at 2 years.
RESULTS: Study participants were separated into the chemotherapy group (n = 36) and the non-chemotherapy group (n = 78). In the chemotherapy group, patients who had moderate ADR endurance scores were more likely to choose the new therapy (0-33, 34-67, and 68-100 points: 0.0, 54.5, and 27.3 %; χ (2) test, p = 0.15). Additionally, every patient on long-term chemotherapy (≥3 years) had high ADR endurance scores but did not choose the new, riskier treatment. In the non-chemotherapy group, the proportion of those choosing the new therapy was linearly associated with higher ADR endurance scores (25.9, 38.2, and 64.7 %; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Cancer patients may prefer aggressive therapies, even when self-estimations of ADR endurance are not very high, especially if they have been receiving chemotherapy for a short period of time. These patients should be observed with great caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25294657     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2439-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  19 in total

1.  Preference weights for chemotherapy side effects from the perspective of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  I Kuchuk; N Bouganim; K Beusterien; J Grinspan; L Vandermeer; S Gertler; S F Dent; X Song; R Segal; S Mazzarello; F Crawley; G Dranitsaris; M Clemons
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Quality of life and preferences for treatment following systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lindley; S Vasa; W T Sawyer; E P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: a review of what makes it worthwhile.

Authors:  V Duric; M Stockler
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  What are cancer patients' preferences about treatment at the end of life, and who should start talking about it? A comparison with healthy people and medical staff.

Authors:  S Sahm; R Will; G Hommel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Patient preference for cancer therapy: an overview of measurement approaches.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Framing of outcome and probability of recurrence: breast cancer patients' choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in hypothetical patient scenarios.

Authors:  C Zimmermann; C Baldo; A Molino
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Review of determinants of patients' preferences for adjuvant therapy in cancer.

Authors:  Sylvia J T Jansen; Wilma Otten; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Use of conjoint analysis to assess breast cancer patient preferences for chemotherapy side effects.

Authors:  Kathleen Beusterien; Jessica Grinspan; Iryna Kuchuk; Sasha Mazzarello; Susan Dent; Stan Gertler; Nathaniel Bouganim; Lisa Vandermeer; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-01-28

9.  Patients' views about causes and preferences for the management of cancer-related fatigue-a case for non-congruence with the physicians?

Authors:  Christophe Luthy; Christine Cedraschi; Angela Pugliesi; Katie Di Silvestro; Beatrice Mugnier-Konrad; Elisabetta Rapiti; Anne-Francoise Allaz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile?

Authors:  S J Jansen; J Kievit; M A Nooij; J C de Haes; I M Overpelt; H van Slooten; E Maartense; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.