Literature DB >> 27239064

Targets for Neoadjuvant Therapy - The Preferences of Patients with Early Breast Cancer.

M Thill1, G Pisa2, G Isbary3.   

Abstract

Background: Therapists and administrative bodies consider a pathological complete remission as an independent and relevant endpoint in evaluations of the clinical utility of neoadjuvant therapy for early breast cancer. The present study aims to investigate which treatment outcomes of a neoadjuvant therapy are considered by the patients themselves to be relevant. Materials and
Methods: With the help of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methods patient preferences about the treatment targets of neoadjuvant therapy were assessed quantitatively. All participants had undergone a neoadjuvant therapy in the form of chemotherapy and, in HER2-positive cases, as a targeted antibody therapy against HER2 for the primary diagnosis of early breast cancer 12-36 months prior to the interview. The criteria for the hierarchy model were identified in an earlier qualitative survey. The patient interviews were conducted by 4 experienced female interviewers.
Results: Forty-one patients participated in the quantitative survey, of these 15 (36.6 %) had suffered from HER2-positive disease. The achievement of pCR was the most important therapeutic target for the patients, even before disease-free survival, overall survival and the option for breast-preserving operation. Avoidance of side effects was considered to be the least important. In a comparison of the side effects the patients judged fatigue to be most important before nausea and loss of hair.
Conclusion: For the patients the achievement of a pathological complete remission is considered to be an independent, relevant and highly desired target of neoadjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemotherapy; early breast cancer; neoadjuvant; pathological complete remission (pCR); patient preference

Year:  2016        PMID: 27239064      PMCID: PMC4873298          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-101025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of two multi-criteria decision techniques for eliciting treatment preferences in people with neurological disorders.

Authors:  Maarten J Ijzerman; Janine A van Til; Govert J Snoek
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Nicholas Pavlidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Preference weights for chemotherapy side effects from the perspective of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  I Kuchuk; N Bouganim; K Beusterien; J Grinspan; L Vandermeer; S Gertler; S F Dent; X Song; R Segal; S Mazzarello; F Crawley; G Dranitsaris; M Clemons
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Current and future role of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael Untch; Gottfried E Konecny; Stefan Paepke; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Stability of preferences with regard to adjuvant chemotherapy: impact of treatment decision, experience and the passing of time.

Authors:  S J T Jansen; W Otten; M C M Baas-Thijssen; C J H VAN DE Velde; H W R Nortier; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Patient preferences for chemotherapies used in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen Beusterien; Jessica Grinspan; Thomas Tencer; Adam Brufsky; Constance Visovsky
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-06-28

8.  Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile?

Authors:  S J Jansen; J Kievit; M A Nooij; J C de Haes; I M Overpelt; H van Slooten; E Maartense; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)†.

Authors:  F Cardoso; A Costa; L Norton; E Senkus; M Aapro; F André; C H Barrios; J Bergh; L Biganzoli; K L Blackwell; M J Cardoso; T Cufer; N El Saghir; L Fallowfield; D Fenech; P Francis; K Gelmon; S H Giordano; J Gligorov; A Goldhirsch; N Harbeck; N Houssami; C Hudis; B Kaufman; I Krop; S Kyriakides; U N Lin; M Mayer; S D Merjaver; E B Nordström; O Pagani; A Partridge; F Penault-Llorca; M J Piccart; H Rugo; G Sledge; C Thomssen; L Van't Veer; D Vorobiof; C Vrieling; N West; B Xu; E Winer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  J S D Mieog; J A van der Hage; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Patient Preference Studies During Early Drug Development: Aligning Stakeholders to Ensure Development Plans Meet Patient Needs.

Authors:  Nigel S Cook; Julie Cave; Anke-Peggy Holtorf
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 2.  Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in Oncology with a Focus on the Older Patient-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Petronella A L Nelleke Seghers; Anke Wiersma; Suzanne Festen; Mariken E Stegmann; Pierre Soubeyran; Siri Rostoft; Shane O'Hanlon; Johanneke E A Portielje; Marije E Hamaker
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.