Literature DB >> 24129007

Eye-tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of aided AAC displays influence the efficiency of locating symbols by school-age children without disabilities.

Krista M Wilkinson, Tara O'Neill, William J McIlvane.   

Abstract

PURPOSE Many individuals with communication impairments use aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems involving letters, words, or line drawings that rely on the visual modality. It seems reasonable to suggest that display design should incorporate information about how users attend to and process visual information. The organization of AAC symbols can influence the speed and accuracy with which children select a target symbol on a display. This research examined why some displays facilitate responding. METHOD Eye-tracking technology recorded point-of-gaze while children without disabilities engaged in a visual search task with 2 AAC displays. In 1 display, symbols sharing an internal color were clustered together. In the other display, like-colored symbols were distributed. Dependent measures were (a) latency to fixate on the target compared with distracters and (b) the number of fixations to target and distracters. RESULTS Participants were significantly slower to fixate on the target when like-colored symbols were distributed; there was a significant increase in the number of fixations to distracters that did not share color with the target. CONCLUSIONS Efficient search was related to minimizing fixations to nonrelevant distracters. Vulnerability to distraction can be a significant problem in individuals with disabilities who use AAC. Minimizing the intrusion of such distraction may, therefore, be of importance in AAC display design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24129007     DOI: 10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-12-0159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  6 in total

1.  Eye tracking research to answer questions about augmentative and alternative communication assessment and intervention.

Authors:  Krista M Wilkinson; Teresa Mitchell
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Is Hand Selection Modulated by Cognitive-perceptual Load?

Authors:  Jiali Liang; Krista Wilkinson; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Eye Tracking Measures Reveal How Changes in the Design of Displays for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Influence Visual Search in Individuals With Down Syndrome or Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Krista M Wilkinson; Marissa Madel
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Judicious Arrangement of Symbols on a Simulated Augmentative and Alternative Communication Display Optimizes Visual Attention by Individuals With Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Krista M Wilkinson; Rick Gilmore; Yiming Qian
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Visual Attention to Cued Targets in Simulated Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication Displays for Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Authors:  Krista M Wilkinson; Tara O'Neill Zimmerman; Janice Light
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Relation between Physiological Parameters and Colour Modifications in Text Background and Overlay during Reading in Children with and without Dyslexia.

Authors:  Tamara Jakovljević; Milica M Janković; Andrej M Savić; Ivan Soldatović; Gordana Čolić; Tadeja Jere Jakulin; Gregor Papa; Vanja Ković
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-04-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.