| Literature DB >> 24126768 |
T L Barnes1, J L Crandell, R A Bell, E J Mayer-Davis, D Dabelea, A D Liese.
Abstract
Youth with diabetes are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet has been shown to improve CVD risk. In this study, we evaluated whether changes in diet quality as characterized by DASH are associated with changes in CVD risk factors in youth with diabetes over time. Longitudinal mixed models were applied to data from 797 participants in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study representing three time points: baseline, 12- and 60-month follow-up. Data were restricted to youth whose diabetes was first diagnosed in 2002-2005. DASH-related adherence was poor and changed very little over time. However, an increase in DASH diet score was significantly associated with a decrease in HbA1c levels in youth with type 1 diabetes (β=-0.20, P-value=0.0063) and a decrease in systolic blood pressure among youth with type 2 diabetes (β=-2.02, P-value=0.0406). Improvements in dietary quality may be beneficial in youth with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. However, further work in larger groups of youth with type 1 and 2 diabetes is desirable.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24126768 PMCID: PMC3817346 DOI: 10.1038/nutd.2013.32
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Diabetes ISSN: 2044-4052 Impact factor: 5.097
Mean values (s.d.) for DASH diet score and cardiovascular risk factors by visit and diabetes type
| DASH score at baseline | 39.8 (9.0) | 39.7 (9.0) | 39.9 (8.9) |
| Change in DASH score | — | −0.18 (10.1) | −0.41 (11.2) |
| Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | |||
| Systolic BP (mm Hg) | |||
| HDL cholesterol (mg dl−1) | 52.8 (12.3) | 53.0 (11.3) | 53.5 (13.7) |
| LDL cholesterol (mg dl−1) | 94.1 (25.7) | 94.1 (25.1) | 97.3 (28.9) |
| LDL/HDL ratio | 1.86 (0.62) | 1.86 (0.64) | 1.95 (0.82) |
| Total cholesterol (mg dl−1) | |||
| Triglycerides (mg dl−1) | |||
| BMI- | 0.52 (0.98) | 0.50 (0.96) | 0.65 (0.91) |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 77.2 (11.7) | 79.3 (11.7) | 86.8 (12.0) |
| HbA1c (%) | |||
| DASH score at baseline | 36.4 (9.6) | 36.7 (9.4) | 36.8 (9.9) |
| Change in DASH score | — | −0.36 (10.7) | 1.99 (11.4) |
| Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | 72.9 (9.9) | 71.2 (10.2) | 74.6 (8.2) |
| Systolic BP (mm Hg) | 118.2 (12.5) | 115.6 (11.2) | 117.4 (13.2) |
| HDL cholesterol (mg dl−1) | |||
| LDL cholesterol (mg dl−1) | 102.6 (28.3) | 102.4 (32.3) | 108.1 (34.4) |
| LDL/HDL Ratio | 2.57 (0.89) | 2.50 (0.76) | 2.50 (0.94) |
| Total cholesterol (mg dl−1) | 174.3 (35.3) | 174.0 (37.5) | 184.5 (41.1) |
| Triglycerides (mg dl−1) | 169.7 (213.4) | 165.5 (172.4) | 171.9 (182.8) |
| BMI- | |||
| Waist circumference (cm) | 110.7 (23.0) | 113.0 (18.4) | 113.1 (21.3) |
| HbA1c (%) | |||
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.
617 participants for baseline visit.
278 participants for follow-up visit 1 and 231 for follow-up visit 2.
Significantly varied by visit, P<0.05.
180 participants for baseline visit.
65 participants for follow-up visit 1 and 53 for follow-up visit 2. Bold values were those values that significantly varied by visit, P<0.05.
Longitudinal mixed modeling results for change in DASH diet score and cardiovascular disease risk factors
| P | P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | −0.11 | 0.34 | 0.7574 | −0.07 | 0.39 | 0.8523 |
| Systolic BP (mm Hg) | −0.18 | 0.37 | 0.6234 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.3908 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg dl−1) | 0.31 | 0.49 | 0.5234 | −0.32 | 0.44 | 0.4701 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg dl−1) | −1.81 | 1.11 | 0.1038 | 0.39 | 0.91 | 0.6677 |
| LDL/HDL ratio | −0.05 | 0.03 | 0.0604 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.3565 |
| Total cholesterol (mg dl−1) | −1.84 | 1.36 | 0.1764 | −0.27 | 1.25 | 0.8291 |
| Triglycerides (mg dl−1) | −0.35 | 3.08 | 0.9107 | 1.13 | 3.71 | 0.7609 |
| BMI− | −0.02 | 0.02 | 0.3533 | 0.004 | 0.02 | 0.8399 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.7236 | −0.02 | 0.23 | 0.9285 |
| HbA1c (%) | −0.10 | 0.07 | 0.1698 | − | ||
| Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | −0.29 | 0.72 | 0.6869 | −0.10 | 0.79 | 0.8968 |
| Systolic BP (mm Hg) | −0.85 | 0.85 | 0.3185 | − | ||
| HDL cholesterol (mg dl−1) | −0.23 | 0.76 | 0.7588 | 0.08 | 0.67 | 0.9060 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg dl−1) | −4.72 | 2.38 | 0.0504 | −1.59 | 2.09 | 0.4492 |
| LDL/HDL ratio | − | −0.06 | 0.07 | 0.3570 | ||
| Total cholesterol (mg dl−1) | − | −1.31 | 2.49 | 0.5993 | ||
| Triglycerides (mg dl−1) | −24.00 | 17.17 | 0.1660 | −3.68 | 10.39 | 0.7236 |
| BMI− | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.6071 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.1986 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | −1.87 | 1.06 | 0.0822 | −1.97 | 1.14 | 0.0864 |
| HbA1c (%) | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.4026 | −0.08 | 0.18 | 0.6492 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.
Models adjusted for the following covariates: diabetes mellitus duration at visit, age at visit, height at visit, BMI-Z score at visit, waist circumference at visit, physical activity, gender, race, income at visit and study site.
β, change per 10-unit increase in DASH score at baseline; β2, change per 10-unit increase in change in DASH Score.
1126 observations were used for Type 1 diabetes participants (including 617 participants at baseline, 278 participants for follow-up visit 1 and 231 participants for follow-up visit 2).
298 observations were used for Type 2 diabetes participants (including 180 participants at baseline, 65 participants for follow-up visit 1 and 53 participants for follow-up visit 2). Bold values were those values with significant associations in modeling results.