Literature DB >> 24126556

The distribution of self-reported psychotic-like experiences in non-psychotic help-seeking mental health patients in the general population; a factor mixture analysis.

Judith Rietdijk1, Marjolein Fokkema, Daniel Stahl, Lucia Valmaggia, Helga K Ising, Sara Dragt, Rianne M C Klaassen, Dorien H Nieman, Rachel Loewy, Pim Cuijpers, Philippe Delespaul, Don H Linszen, Mark van der Gaag.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Factor mixture analysis (FMA) and item response mixture models in the general population have shown that the psychosis phenotype has four classes. This study attempted to replicate this finding in help-seeking people accessing mental health services for symptoms of non-psychotic mental disorders.
METHODS: All patients (18-35 years old) referred for non-psychotic mental health problems to the secondary mental healthcare service in The Hague between February 2008 to February 2010 (N = 3,694), were included. Patients completed the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ). Hybrid latent class analysis was applied to explore the number, size and symptom profiles of the classes.
RESULTS: The FMA resulted in four classes. Class 1 (N = 1,039, 28.1%) scored high on conceptual disorganization, inattention and mood disorder. Patients in Class 2 (N = 619, 16.8%) endorsed almost all PQ-items, were more often screened as being psychotic or at high risk of developing psychosis, without care takers noticing. In Class 3 (N = 1,747, 47.3%) perplexity, paranoia and negative symptoms were more prevalent. Patients were more often at high risk of developing psychosis. Class 4 (N = 286, 7.7%) represented the 'normative' group with low probabilities for all items. DISCUSSION: The results support the hypothesis that a representation in four classes of psychotic-like experiences can also be applied in a help-seeking population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24126556     DOI: 10.1007/s00127-013-0772-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  31 in total

Review 1.  Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning.

Authors:  H H Goldman; A E Skodol; T R Lave
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability.

Authors:  Tandy J Miller; Thomas H McGlashan; Joanna L Rosen; Kristen Cadenhead; Tyrone Cannon; Joseph Ventura; William McFarlane; Diana O Perkins; Godfrey D Pearlson; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  A population based analysis of subclinical psychosis and help-seeking behavior.

Authors:  Jamie Murphy; Mark Shevlin; James Houston; Gary Adamson
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Extended psychosis phenotype--yes: single continuum--unlikely.

Authors:  N Kaymaz; J van Os
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  The incidence and outcome of subclinical psychotic experiences in the general population.

Authors:  Manon Hanssen; Maarten Bak; Rob Bijl; Wilma Vollebergh; Jim van Os
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2005-06

6.  Axis-I disorders and vulnerability to psychosis.

Authors:  Tanja Svirskis; Jyrki Korkeila; Markus Heinimaa; Jukka Huttunen; Tuula Ilonen; Terja Ristkari; Thomas McGlashan; Raimo K R Salokangas
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Strauss (1969) revisited: a psychosis continuum in the general population?

Authors:  J van Os; M Hanssen; R V Bijl; A Ravelli
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Baseline differences in clinical symptomatology between ultra high risk subjects with and without a transition to psychosis.

Authors:  Eva Velthorst; Dorien H Nieman; Hiske E Becker; Reinaud van de Fliert; Peter M Dingemans; Rianne Klaassen; Lieuwe de Haan; Thérèse van Amelsvoort; Don H Linszen
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Cannabis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Theresa H M Moore; Stanley Zammit; Anne Lingford-Hughes; Thomas R E Barnes; Peter B Jones; Margaret Burke; Glyn Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The "close-in" or ultra high-risk model: a safe and effective strategy for research and clinical intervention in prepsychotic mental disorder.

Authors:  Patrick D McGorry; Alison R Yung; Lisa J Phillips
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

View more
  2 in total

1.  Interpersonal sensitivity and functioning impairment in youth at ultra-high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  A Masillo; L R Valmaggia; R Saba; M Brandizzi; J F Lindau; A Solfanelli; M Curto; F Narilli; L Telesforo; G D Kotzalidis; D Di Pietro; M D'Alema; P Girardi; P Fiori Nastro
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Severity of thought disorder predicts psychosis in persons at clinical high-risk.

Authors:  Diana O Perkins; Clark D Jeffries; Barbara A Cornblatt; Scott W Woods; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Robert Heinssen; Daniel H Mathalon; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Thomas H McGlashan
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.939

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.