Literature DB >> 19272756

Baseline differences in clinical symptomatology between ultra high risk subjects with and without a transition to psychosis.

Eva Velthorst1, Dorien H Nieman, Hiske E Becker, Reinaud van de Fliert, Peter M Dingemans, Rianne Klaassen, Lieuwe de Haan, Thérèse van Amelsvoort, Don H Linszen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The chance of transition to psychosis in patients at Ultra High Risk for developing psychosis (UHR) is 10-15%. The aim of present study was to investigate differences in baseline clinical symptomatology, general level of functioning (GAF-score) and genetic risk between UHR patients who did (UHR+T) or did not (UHR+NT) make a transition to psychosis. Sharpening UHR inclusion criteria may aid in improving prediction of transition to psychosis.
METHOD: The study sample was taken from 285 patients who were examined within the Dutch Prediction of Psychosis Study (DUPS) at the Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Out of 73 included UHR subjects, 18 made a transition to psychosis. Psychopathology was investigated with the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes, Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms and GAF-score. The follow-up period of the study was three years.
RESULTS: The UHR+T group showed more social anhedonia and withdrawal, more bizarre thinking and a lower GAF score at baseline than the UHR+NT group.
CONCLUSIONS: In agreement with the results of Cannon et al. [Cannon, T.D., Cadenhead, K., Cornblatt, B., Woods, S.W., Addington, J., Walker, E., Seidman, L.J., Perkins, D., Tsuang, M., McGlashan, T., Heinssen, R., 2008. Prediction of Psychosis in Youth at High Clinical Risk: A Multisite Longitudinal Study in North America. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 65 (1) 28-37.], our study indicates that severity of specific symptoms at baseline is related to transition to psychosis in UHR subjects. These findings may contribute to a more accurate prediction of a first psychotic episode. Furthermore, symptoms that are increased at baseline in the UHR+T group could be a focus of cognitive behavioural therapy in the UHR period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19272756     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  64 in total

1.  Introduction: The extended psychosis phenotype--relationship with schizophrenia and with ultrahigh risk status for psychosis.

Authors:  Jim van Os; Richard J Linscott
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  A review of negative symptom assessment strategies in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Gregory P Strauss; Andrea Pelletier-Baldelli; Katherine Frost Visser; Elaine F Walker; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Reduced DNA Methylation of the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Is Associated With Anhedonia-Asociality in Women With Recent-Onset Schizophrenia and Ultra-high Risk for Psychosis.

Authors:  Minji Bang; Jee In Kang; Se Joo Kim; Jin Young Park; Kyung Ran Kim; Su Young Lee; Kyungmee Park; Eun Lee; Seung-Koo Lee; Suk Kyoon An
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Theory of Mind in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Arielle D Stanford; Julie Messinger; Dolores Malaspina; Cheryl M Corcoran
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Functional development in clinical high risk youth: prediction of schizophrenia versus other psychotic disorders.

Authors:  Sarah I Tarbox; Jean Addington; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Diana O Perkins; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Robert Heinssen; Thomas H McGlashan; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Factor Analysis of Negative Symptom Items in the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes.

Authors:  Matilda Azis; Gregory P Strauss; Elaine Walker; William Revelle; Richard Zinbarg; Vijay Mittal
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2): The Prodromal Symptoms.

Authors:  Jean Addington; Lu Liu; Lisa Buchy; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Diana O Perkins; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Carrie E Bearden; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.254

8.  Childhood maltreatment, adult attachment and psychotic symptomatology: a study in patients, siblings and controls.

Authors:  D S van Dam; N Korver-Nieberg; E Velthorst; C J Meijer; L de Haan
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.328

9.  Deconstructing Negative Symptoms in Individuals at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis: Evidence for Volitional and Diminished Emotionality Subgroups That Predict Clinical Presentation and Functional Outcome.

Authors:  Tina Gupta; Henry R Cowan; Gregory P Strauss; Elaine F Walker; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  'At-risk' for psychosis research: where are we heading?

Authors:  A Lin; B Nelson; A R Yung
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 6.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.