Literature DB >> 24124952

Model-based closed-loop glucose control in type 1 diabetes: the DiaCon experience.

Signe Schmidt1, Dimitri Boiroux, Anne Katrine Duun-Henriksen, Laurits Frøssing, Ole Skyggebjerg, John Bagterp Jørgensen, Niels Kjølstad Poulsen, Henrik Madsen, Sten Madsbad, Kirsten Nørgaard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To improve type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) management, we developed a model predictive control (MPC) algorithm for closed-loop (CL) glucose control based on a linear second-order deterministic-stochastic model. The deterministic part of the model is specified by three patient-specific parameters: insulin sensitivity factor, insulin action time, and basal insulin infusion rate. The stochastic part is identical for all patients but identified from data from a single patient. Results of the first clinical feasibility test of the algorithm are presented.
METHODS: We conducted two randomized crossover studies. Study 1 compared CL with open-loop (OL) control. Study 2 compared glucose control after CL initiation in the euglycemic (CL-Eu) and hyperglycemic (CL-Hyper) ranges, respectively. Patients were studied from 22:00-07:00 on two separate nights.
RESULTS: Each study included six T1DM patients (hemoglobin A1c 7.2% ± 0.4%). In study 1, hypoglycemic events (plasma glucose < 54 mg/dl) occurred on two OL and one CL nights. Average glucose from 22:00-07:00 was 90 mg/dl [74-146 mg/dl; median (interquartile range)] during OL and 108 mg/dl (101-128 mg/dl) during CL (determined by continuous glucose monitoring). However, median time spent in the range 70-144 mg/dl was 67.9% (3.0-73.3%) during OL and 80.8% (70.5-89.7%) during CL. In study 2, there was one episode of hypoglycemia with plasma glucose <54 mg/dl in a CL-Eu night. Mean glucose from 22:00-07:00 and time spent in the range 70-144 mg/dl were 121 mg/dl (117-133 mg/dl) and 69.0% (30.7-77.9%) in CL-Eu and 149 mg/dl (140-193 mg/dl) and 48.2% (34.9-72.5%) in CL-Hyper, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that our novel MPC algorithm can safely and effectively control glucose overnight, also when CL control is initiated during hyperglycemia.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24124952      PMCID: PMC3876369          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  31 in total

1.  Closed-loop artificial pancreas using subcutaneous glucose sensing and insulin delivery and a model predictive control algorithm: preliminary studies in Padova and Montpellier.

Authors:  Daniela Bruttomesso; Anne Farret; Silvana Costa; Maria Cristina Marescotti; Monica Vettore; Angelo Avogaro; Antonio Tiengo; Chiara Dalla Man; Jerome Place; Andrea Facchinetti; Stefania Guerra; Lalo Magni; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Claudio Cobelli; Eric Renard; Alberto Maran
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

2.  A bihormonal closed-loop artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Firas H El-Khatib; Steven J Russell; David M Nathan; Robert G Sutherlin; Edward R Damiano
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Closed-loop artificial pancreas using subcutaneous glucose sensing and insulin delivery and a model predictive control algorithm: the Virginia experience.

Authors:  William L Clarke; Stacey Anderson; Marc Breton; Stephen Patek; Laurissa Kashmer; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

4.  Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  Roman Hovorka; Janet M Allen; Daniela Elleri; Ludovic J Chassin; Julie Harris; Dongyuan Xing; Craig Kollman; Tomas Hovorka; Anne Mette F Larsen; Marianna Nodale; Alessandra De Palma; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Carlo L Acerini; David B Dunger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  New features and performance of a next-generation SEVEN-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time.

Authors:  Timothy Bailey; Howard Zisser; Anna Chang
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Nocturnal glucose control with an artificial pancreas at a diabetes camp.

Authors:  Moshe Phillip; Tadej Battelino; Eran Atlas; Olga Kordonouri; Natasa Bratina; Shahar Miller; Torben Biester; Magdalena Avbelj Stefanija; Ido Muller; Revital Nimri; Thomas Danne
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Model identification using stochastic differential equation grey-box models in diabetes.

Authors:  Anne Katrine Duun-Henriksen; Signe Schmidt; Rikke Meldgaard Røge; Jonas Bech Møller; Kirsten Nørgaard; John Bagterp Jørgensen; Henrik Madsen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01

8.  Fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery versus semiautomated hybrid control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using an artificial pancreas.

Authors:  Stuart A Weinzimer; Garry M Steil; Karena L Swan; Jim Dziura; Natalie Kurtz; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Closed-loop insulin therapy improves glycemic control in children aged <7 years: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrew Dauber; Liat Corcia; Jason Safer; Michael S D Agus; Sara Einis; Garry M Steil
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Clinical evaluation of a personalized artificial pancreas.

Authors:  Eyal Dassau; Howard Zisser; Rebecca A Harvey; Matthew W Percival; Benyamin Grosman; Wendy Bevier; Eran Atlas; Shahar Miller; Revital Nimri; Lois Jovanovic; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  6 in total

1.  Identification of Main Factors Explaining Glucose Dynamics During and Immediately After Moderate Exercise in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Najib Ben Brahim; Jerome Place; Eric Renard; Marc D Breton
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-18

2.  Sensitivity of the Predictive Hypoglycemia Minimizer System to the Algorithm Aggressiveness Factor.

Authors:  Daniel A Finan; Eyal Dassau; Marc D Breton; Stephen D Patek; Thomas W McCann; Boris P Kovatchev; Francis J Doyle; Brian L Levy; Ramakrishna Venugopalan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-30

3.  An Adaptive Nonlinear Basal-Bolus Calculator for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Dimitri Boiroux; Tinna Björk Aradóttir; Kirsten Nørgaard; Niels Kjølstad Poulsen; Henrik Madsen; John Bagterp Jørgensen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-25

4.  Predicting Plasma Glucose From Interstitial Glucose Observations Using Bayesian Methods.

Authors:  Alexander Hildenbrand Hansen; Anne Katrine Duun-Henriksen; Rune Juhl; Signe Schmidt; Kirsten Nørgaard; John Bagterp Jørgensen; Henrik Madsen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-06

Review 5.  A Review of the Current Challenges Associated with the Development of an Artificial Pancreas by a Double Subcutaneous Approach.

Authors:  Sverre Christian Christiansen; Anders Lyngvi Fougner; Øyvind Stavdahl; Konstanze Kölle; Reinold Ellingsen; Sven Magnus Carlsen
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 6.  Efficacy and safety of the artificial pancreas in the paediatric population with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Susanna Esposito; Elisa Santi; Giulia Mancini; Francesco Rogari; Giorgia Tascini; Giada Toni; Alberto Argentiero; Maria Giulia Berioli
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.