PURPOSE: To evaluate the importance of T2*-effects on the arterial input function (AIF) and on the resulting dynamic parameter estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of high-grade gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients with high-grade gliomas were imaged in total 50 times using a double-echo DCE sequence. Kinetic analysis using the extended Tofts model was performed using AIFs with and without correction for T2*-effects, and the resulting estimates of the transfer constant (K(trans) ), blood plasma volume (vp ), and the rate constant (kep ) were compared. Numerical simulations were done for comparison with clinical results as well as to further investigate the dependency of parameter values on the magnitude of T2*-induced errors. RESULTS: All kinetic parameters were found to be overestimated if T2*-effects in the AIF were not accounted for; with vp being most severely affected. The relative error in each parameter was dependent on the absolute parameter magnitude, resulting in incorrect parametric tumor distributions in the presence of uncorrected AIF T2*-effects. CONCLUSION: In DCE, a sufficiently short echo time should be used or corrections for T2*-effects based on double-echo acquisition should be made for correct quantification of kinetic parameters.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the importance of T2*-effects on the arterial input function (AIF) and on the resulting dynamic parameter estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of high-grade gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients with high-grade gliomas were imaged in total 50 times using a double-echo DCE sequence. Kinetic analysis using the extended Tofts model was performed using AIFs with and without correction for T2*-effects, and the resulting estimates of the transfer constant (K(trans) ), blood plasma volume (vp ), and the rate constant (kep ) were compared. Numerical simulations were done for comparison with clinical results as well as to further investigate the dependency of parameter values on the magnitude of T2*-induced errors. RESULTS: All kinetic parameters were found to be overestimated if T2*-effects in the AIF were not accounted for; with vp being most severely affected. The relative error in each parameter was dependent on the absolute parameter magnitude, resulting in incorrect parametric tumor distributions in the presence of uncorrected AIF T2*-effects. CONCLUSION: In DCE, a sufficiently short echo time should be used or corrections for T2*-effects based on double-echo acquisition should be made for correct quantification of kinetic parameters.
Authors: Luke Xie; Anita T Layton; Nian Wang; Peder E Z Larson; Jeff L Zhang; Vivian S Lee; Chunlei Liu; G Allan Johnson Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2015-10-07
Authors: Kiaran P McGee; Ken-Pin Hwang; Daniel C Sullivan; John Kurhanewicz; Yanle Hu; Jihong Wang; Wen Li; Josef Debbins; Eric Paulson; Jeffrey R Olsen; Chia-Ho Hua; Lizette Warner; Daniel Ma; Eduardo Moros; Neelam Tyagi; Caroline Chung Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Caterina Brighi; Lee Reid; Laura A Genovesi; Marija Kojic; Amanda Millar; Zara Bruce; Alison L White; Bryan W Day; Stephen Rose; Andrew K Whittaker; Simon Puttick Journal: Theranostics Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Natsuko Onishi; Meredith Sadinski; Mary C Hughes; Eun Sook Ko; Peter Gibbs; Katherine M Gallagher; Maggie M Fung; Theodore J Hunt; Danny F Martinez; Amita Shukla-Dave; Elizabeth A Morris; Elizabeth J Sutton Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 6.466