PURPOSE: To automatically and robustly detect the arterial input function (AIF) with high detection accuracy and low computational cost in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we developed an automatic AIF detection method using an accelerated version (Fast-AP) of affinity propagation (AP) clustering. The validity of this Fast-AP-based method was proved on two DCE-MRI datasets, i.e., rat kidney and human head and neck. The detailed AIF detection performance of this proposed method was assessed in comparison with other clustering-based methods, namely original AP and K-means, as well as the manual AIF detection method. RESULTS: Both the automatic AP- and Fast-AP-based methods achieved satisfactory AIF detection accuracy, but the computational cost of Fast-AP could be reduced by 64.37-92.10% on rat dataset and 73.18-90.18% on human dataset compared with the cost of AP. The K-means yielded the lowest computational cost, but resulted in the lowest AIF detection accuracy. The experimental results demonstrated that both the AP- and Fast-AP-based methods were insensitive to the initialization of cluster centers, and had superior robustness compared with K-means method. CONCLUSION: The Fast-AP-based method enables automatic AIF detection with high accuracy and efficiency.
PURPOSE: To automatically and robustly detect the arterial input function (AIF) with high detection accuracy and low computational cost in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we developed an automatic AIF detection method using an accelerated version (Fast-AP) of affinity propagation (AP) clustering. The validity of this Fast-AP-based method was proved on two DCE-MRI datasets, i.e., rat kidney and human head and neck. The detailed AIF detection performance of this proposed method was assessed in comparison with other clustering-based methods, namely original AP and K-means, as well as the manual AIF detection method. RESULTS: Both the automatic AP- and Fast-AP-based methods achieved satisfactory AIF detection accuracy, but the computational cost of Fast-AP could be reduced by 64.37-92.10% on rat dataset and 73.18-90.18% on human dataset compared with the cost of AP. The K-means yielded the lowest computational cost, but resulted in the lowest AIF detection accuracy. The experimental results demonstrated that both the AP- and Fast-AP-based methods were insensitive to the initialization of cluster centers, and had superior robustness compared with K-means method. CONCLUSION: The Fast-AP-based method enables automatic AIF detection with high accuracy and efficiency.
Authors: Hatim Chafi; Saba N Elias; Huyen T Nguyen; Harry T Friel; Michael V Knopp; BeiBei Guo; Steven B Heymsfield; Guang Jia Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Yi Guo; Sajan Goud Lingala; Yannick Bliesener; R Marc Lebel; Yinghua Zhu; Krishna S Nayak Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Wei Huang; Yiyi Chen; Andriy Fedorov; Xia Li; Guido H Jajamovich; Dariya I Malyarenko; Madhava P Aryal; Peter S LaViolette; Matthew J Oborski; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Richard G Abramson; Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani; Aneela Afzal; Alina Tudorica; Brendan Moloney; Sandeep N Gupta; Cecilia Besa; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; James M Mountz; Charles M Laymon; Mark Muzi; Kathleen Schmainda; Yue Cao; Thomas L Chenevert; Bachir Taouli; Thomas E Yankeelov; Fiona Fennessy; Xin Li Journal: Tomography Date: 2016-03