PURPOSE: To investigate MR lymphangiography in mice and primates with intradermal Gadofosveset and human serum albumin. Gadofosveset is a US FDA approved small molecule Gadolinium (Gd) chelate (957 Da) which reversibly binds serum albumin and temporally behaves as a macromolecule. As the structure of albumin varies among species, the affinity of Gadofosveset is optimized for human albumin. In this study, Gadofosveset premixed with 10% human serum albumin (HSA) was injected intradermally in mice and monkeys, and then MR lymphangiography was performed on a 3.0 Tesla clinical scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty microliters of each agent was injected intradermally at both sides of the front and back paws using a 30-gauge needle into female athymic nude mice (6-8 weeks old, n = 3 mice in each group). The performance of Gadofosveset-HSA was compared with Gd-labeled dendrimers (G4: 6 nm, G6: 10 nm) or Gd-DTPA. The target-to-muscle ratio (TMR = target signal intensity (SI)/muscle SI) was calculated at each time point. The TMRs were compared with a one-way analysis of variance followed by a Bonferroni multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Images taken as early as 2.5 min after intradermal (id) injection depicted enhanced lymph nodes using Gadofosveset-HSA (2.41 ± 0.20). Up to 7.5 min after injection, TMRs of Gadofosveset-HSA were greater than those of dendrimers (G4 or G6-Gd-DTPA: 2.24 ± 0.10, 2.12 ± 0.11, respectively). By 15 min postinjection, TMRs of Gadofosveset-HSA (2.18 ± 0.19) were comparable to Gd-labeled dendrimers (G4-Gd-DTPA: 2.37 ± 0.15, G6-Gd-DTPA: 2.25 ± 0.18). Gadofosveset-HSA and Gd labeled dendrimers resulted in satisfactory MR lymphography in mice and monkeys. CONCLUSION: Because both Gadofosveset and HSA are approved for human use and Gadofosveset clears rapidly through the kidneys, this method has advantages over Gd-dendrimers and could be used for visualizing lymphatic drainage and detecting lymph nodes.
PURPOSE: To investigate MR lymphangiography in mice and primates with intradermal Gadofosveset and humanserum albumin. Gadofosveset is a US FDA approved small molecule Gadolinium (Gd) chelate (957 Da) which reversibly binds serum albumin and temporally behaves as a macromolecule. As the structure of albumin varies among species, the affinity of Gadofosveset is optimized for humanalbumin. In this study, Gadofosveset premixed with 10% humanserum albumin (HSA) was injected intradermally in mice and monkeys, and then MR lymphangiography was performed on a 3.0 Tesla clinical scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty microliters of each agent was injected intradermally at both sides of the front and back paws using a 30-gauge needle into female athymic nude mice (6-8 weeks old, n = 3 mice in each group). The performance of Gadofosveset-HSA was compared with Gd-labeled dendrimers (G4: 6 nm, G6: 10 nm) or Gd-DTPA. The target-to-muscle ratio (TMR = target signal intensity (SI)/muscle SI) was calculated at each time point. The TMRs were compared with a one-way analysis of variance followed by a Bonferroni multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Images taken as early as 2.5 min after intradermal (id) injection depicted enhanced lymph nodes using Gadofosveset-HSA (2.41 ± 0.20). Up to 7.5 min after injection, TMRs of Gadofosveset-HSA were greater than those of dendrimers (G4 or G6-Gd-DTPA: 2.24 ± 0.10, 2.12 ± 0.11, respectively). By 15 min postinjection, TMRs of Gadofosveset-HSA (2.18 ± 0.19) were comparable to Gd-labeled dendrimers (G4-Gd-DTPA: 2.37 ± 0.15, G6-Gd-DTPA: 2.25 ± 0.18). Gadofosveset-HSA and Gd labeled dendrimers resulted in satisfactory MR lymphography in mice and monkeys. CONCLUSION: Because both Gadofosveset and HSA are approved for human use and Gadofosveset clears rapidly through the kidneys, this method has advantages over Gd-dendrimers and could be used for visualizing lymphatic drainage and detecting lymph nodes.
Authors: R B Lauffer; D J Parmelee; H S Ouellet; R P Dolan; H Sajiki; D M Scott; P J Bernard; E M Buchanan; K Y Ong; Z Tyeklár; K S Midelfort; T J McMurry; R C Walovitch Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: H Kobayashi; N Sato; A Hiraga; T Saga; Y Nakamoto; H Ueda; J Konishi; K Togashi; M W Brechbiel Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: R B Lauffer; D J Parmelee; S U Dunham; H S Ouellet; R P Dolan; S Witte; T J McMurry; R C Walovitch Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: T M Grist; F R Korosec; D C Peters; S Witte; R C Walovitch; R P Dolan; W E Bridson; E K Yucel; C A Mistretta Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Christoph U Herborn; Thomas C Lauenstein; Florian M Vogt; Randall B Lauffer; Jörg F Debatin; Stephan G Ruehm Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Hisataka Kobayashi; Satomi Kawamoto; Robert A Star; Thomas A Waldmann; Yutaka Tagaya; Martin W Brechbiel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hisataka Kobayashi; Satomi Kawamoto; Yoshio Sakai; Peter L Choyke; Robert A Star; Martin W Brechbiel; Noriko Sato; Yutaka Tagaya; John C Morris; Thomas A Waldmann Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-05-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Alanna Ruddell; Sara B Kirschbaum; Sheila N Ganti; Cheng-Liang Liu; Ryan R Sun; Savannah C Partridge Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Baris Turkbey; Robert F Hoyt; Harsh K Agarwal; Marcelino Bernardo; Sandeep Sankineni; Linda Johnson; Kinzya B Grant; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Hisataka Kobayashi; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Gary L Griffiths; Peter L Choyke Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 3.173