Literature DB >> 24122065

A literature review and novel theoretical approach on the optical properties of whole blood.

Nienke Bosschaart, Gerda J Edelman, Maurice C G Aalders, Ton G van Leeuwen, Dirk J Faber.   

Abstract

Optical property measurements on blood are influenced by a large variety of factors of both physical and methodological origin. The aim of this review is to list these factors of influence and to provide the reader with optical property spectra (250–2,500 nm) for whole blood that can be used in the practice of biomedical optics (tabulated in the appendix). Hereto, we perform a critical examination and selection of the available optical property spectra of blood in literature, from which we compile average spectra for the absorption coefficient (μ(a)), scattering coefficient (μ(s)) and scattering anisotropy (g). From this, we calculate the reduced scattering coefficient (μ(s)′) and the effective attenuation coefficient (μ(eff)). In the compilation of μ(a) and μ(s), we incorporate the influences of absorption flattening and dependent scattering (i.e. spatial correlations between positions of red blood cells), respectively. For the influence of dependent scattering on μ(s), we present a novel, theoretically derived formula that can be used for practical rescaling of μ(s) to other haematocrits. Since the measurement of the scattering properties of blood has been proven to be challenging, we apply an alternative, theoretical approach to calculate spectra for μ(s) and g. Hereto, we combine Kramers–Kronig analysis with analytical scattering theory, extended with Percus–Yevick structure factors that take into account the effect of dependent scattering in whole blood. We argue that our calculated spectra may provide a better estimation for μ(s) and g (and hence μ(s)′ and μ(eff)) than the compiled spectra from literature for wavelengths between 300 and 600 nm.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24122065      PMCID： PMC3953607          DOI： 10.1007/s10103-013-1446-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN： 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


Introduction

The interaction of light with blood plays an important role in optical diagnostics and therapeutics—for instance for the non-invasive assessment of blood composition [1] and the laser treatment of varicose veins [2]. Predictions on the accuracy and outcome of these optical methods can be obtained through simulation models of the light–blood interaction. The reliability of these models depends foremost on accurate knowledge of the optical properties of blood, which include the absorption coefficient μa, scattering coefficient μs and scattering anisotropy g that parameterizes the phase function p(θ). Dating back to as early as 1943 [3], many studies have focused on the quantitative assessment of these optical properties [4-10]. These studies demonstrated that optical property measurements on whole blood are challenging, due to the considerable light attenuation in undiluted blood. Although light attenuation is less in diluted samples, rescaling of the optical properties from these samples to whole blood introduces an additional challenge because the scattering properties of blood scale non-linearly as a function of red blood cell concentration (haematocrit) [10-12]. As a consequence, sample preparation, but also measurement method and conditions (e.g. blood flow [7, 13–16]), influences the outcome of the optical property assessment considerably. In this review article, we will therefore provide an overview, interpretation and compilation of the available literature on the optical properties of blood in the visible and near-infrared wavelength range (250–2,500 nm). Our inclusion criteria are (1) publication of both quantitative and spectrally resolved data on μa, μs and g and (2) the use of human blood from healthy adults for sample preparation. In part I (‘Methods’ and ‘Results’ sections) of this article, we focus on the absorption coefficient of whole blood. We compile an average μa spectrum for blood with a haematocrit of 45 % from rescaled spectra that are available in literature, while excluding outlier spectra. We also incorporate the effect of ‘absorption flattening’: the phenomenon that the absorption spectrum of a system of strongly absorbing particles (i.e. red blood cells in whole blood) is reduced compared to that of a suspension containing the same number of absorbing molecules in homogeneous dispersion (i.e. haemolysed blood). The scattering properties of blood (μs and g) are considered in part II (‘Theoretical estimation of ’, ‘Methods’ and ‘Results’ sections) of this article. Given the difficulty in measuring the scattering properties of red blood cells, and the relative ease of measuring absorption spectra of the red blood cells’ contents, we previously proposed a computational approach based on a Kramers–Kronig analysis of the complex refractive index of haemoglobin [17]. We obtained estimates of red blood cell scattering by combining this approach with analytical scattering theory. Here, we extend this method using Percus–Yevick structure factors that take into account the spatial correlations between the positions of individual red blood cells in a whole blood medium. From this, we obtain calculated spectra of μs and g for oxygenized and deoxygenized blood. Moreover, we present a novel scaling relation for μs to different haematocrit values, which we use to theoretically verify a previously published empirical scaling relation [11]. We apply the novel scaling relation to rescale the available literature spectra for μs to a haematocrit of 45 %. From the rescaled spectra, we compile an average μs spectrum for whole blood. We also provide a compiled spectrum of the literature spectra of g. To provide the reader with reasonable means to estimate the scattering coefficient, we present an empirical power law for scattering coefficient versus wavelength (>700 nm). In addition, we provide spectra for the reduced scattering coefficient (μs′) and the effective attenuation coefficient (μeff), derived from both the compiled and calculated spectra of μa, μs and g. The main results of this article are ready-to-use compiled spectra of μa, as well as both compiled and calculated spectra of μs, μs′, μeff and g for whole blood with a haematocrit of 45 %. For convenience, these spectra are tabulated in the Appendix of this article. Moreover, methods for scaling between different haematocrits are presented. We argue that our calculated spectra may provide a better estimation of the scattering properties of whole blood than the compiled spectra from literature for wavelengths <600 nm.

Background

Composition of human blood and its optical properties

Normal human blood consists of red blood cells (RBCs or erythrocytes, ±4,500 × 103/μL blood), white blood cells (leukocytes, ±8 × 103/μL blood), platelets (thrombocytes, ±300 × 103/μL blood) and blood plasma (containing water, electrolytes, plasma proteins, carbohydrates, lipids and various extracellular vesicles [18, 19]). The haematocrit (hct) is defined as the volume percentage of red blood cells in blood and on average amounts to 40 % for adult women and 45 % for adult men. Red blood cells are composed mainly of haemoglobin, with a concentration of ±350 g/L in a cell volume of ±90 fL. In healthy human adults, the average haemoglobin concentration in blood accounts for 140 g/L in women and 155 g/L in men [19]. Accounting for an absorption contribution of two to three orders of magnitude higher than the other blood components, red blood cells are by far the most dominant absorbing element in the blood in the wavelength range of 250–1,100 nm [20]. Practically, all light absorption by the red blood cells is due to haemoglobin, which exhibits specific absorption features for its various derivatives: bound to oxygen (oxyhaemoglobin, HbO2), unbound to oxygen (deoxyhaemoglobin, Hb), bound to carbon monoxide (carboxyhaemoglobin), oxidized (methaemoglobin), fetal and more [4]. From these haemoglobin derivatives, oxyhaemoglobin and deoxyhaemoglobin are the most abundant types in healthy human adult blood. The oxygen saturation of blood is defined as the ratio of the HbO2 concentration to the total haemoglobin concentration, oxygen saturation (SO2) = [HbO2] / ([HbO2] + [Hb]), and amounts to ∼97.5 % in arterial blood and ∼75 % in venous blood [19]. Of all blood particles, red blood cells also predominate the scattering of blood with two to three orders of magnitude, arising from the difference in refractive index between red blood cells and the surrounding blood plasma [20]. Without the presence of red blood cells, plasma absorption in the 250–1,100-nm region is dominated by various proteins, nutritive compounds and/or pharmaceuticals, while plasma scattering is dominated by proteins and platelets [20]. Under pathological conditions, the absorption contribution of certain plasma proteins can become significant even in the presence of red blood cells, e.g. the absorption of bilirubin around 460 nm for jaundiced patients [21]. In the wavelength range beyond 1,100 nm, blood absorption is dominated by the absorption of water [7, 9]. Only when water is removed from the blood, several absorption features due to the presence of haemoglobin, albumin and globulin can be identified as small absorption peaks between 1,690 and 2,400 nm [22].

Factors influencing the optical properties of blood

Since red blood cells are the main contributor to the optical properties of blood, their volume percentage (i.e. haematocrit), haemoglobin concentration and oxygen saturation directly influence the absorption and scattering properties of blood. Whereas the absorption coefficient μa is proportional to the haematocrit, the scattering coefficient μs saturates for hct > 10 %, i.e. μs, is underestimated for high hct values with respect to a linear relationship between the two parameters [10]. Meinke et al. [10], in our opinion correctly, ascribed this saturation effect to a decrease of the mean distance between red blood cells, because it violates the assumption of independent single scattering. This group also reported non-linear deviations of g for hct > 10 %. See part II section of this paper for further discussion. The scattering of blood is primarily caused by the complex refractive index mismatch between red blood cells and plasma. Although most measurements on the optical properties of blood are performed on blood samples where plasma has been replaced by saline/phosphate buffer, Meinke et al. [10, 20] measured that this affects the complex refractive index mismatch considerably, resulting in an overestimation of the scattering coefficient of 5.5–9.4 % with respect to red blood cells in plasma. The principle of causality dictates that the real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index are connected as expressed by the Kramers–Kronig relations. The imaginary part is proportional to the absorption coefficient, which in turn depends on the SO2. Thus, the real part of the complex refractive index is also SO2 dependent and so are the scattering properties [9, 17]. This influence is most prominent in the visible wavelength region where differences in μa due to changes in SO2 are high, leading to deviations up to 15 % in μs and 12 % in g between fully oxygenated and fully deoxygenated blood [9]. Various sources have reported that the shear rate due to blood flow [7, 13–16] and aggregate formation (e.g. rouleaux formation) [13, 23, 24] significantly influence the optical properties of blood due to non-Newtonian flow characteristics. Enejder et al. [13] measured a decrease in the absorption and reduced scattering of bovine blood of ∼3 % when increasing the average shear rate from 0 to 1,600 s−1, as well as a decrease in reduced scattering of 4 % when randomly oriented red blood cells form aggregates. Other reported factors of influence on the optical properties are osmolarity [7], temperature [25, 26], inter-person variability [9] and pathologic disorders such as sickle cell anemia [27]. A special case is that for adults versus fetuses, whose blood is composed of different types of haemoglobin (adult versus fetal haemoglobin) that exhibit slight variations in their absorption features [4].

Measurement methods in literature

Most measurements on whole or diluted blood with intact red blood cells have been performed using single or double integrating sphere geometries. The resulting wavelength-dependent transmission and/or reflectance from a thin sample slab is analysed by inverse Monte Carlo models [6-10] or T-matrix computations [13] to obtain estimates for μa, μs and g. As is acknowledged by various sources [6-8], the assumed scattering phase function of blood in the inverse Monte Carlo analysis highly influences the inferred optical properties—especially μs and g. Although other measurement methods have been reported for optical property measurements on whole blood [28, 29], we did not encounter any studies that exploit these methods experimentally or the quantitative assessment of spectra of μa, μs and g. In addition to whole blood measurements, non-scattering haemolysed blood has been investigated in conventional transmission measurement geometries to assess the μa of haemoglobin only [4, 5]. The refractive index of oxygenated haemoglobin solutions was determined by Friebel et al. [30] from measurements of the Fresnel reflection with an integrating sphere spectrometer. Complementing these measurements, Meinke et al. [10] measured the refractive index of plasma at four wavelengths using an Abbe refractometer, which yielded a Sellmeier equation for the visible wavelength range.

Part I: the absorption coefficient of whole blood

Methods

From the available optical property spectra in literature, we compiled the averaged spectra of μa for whole blood with a haematocrit of 45 %. Criteria for including optical property data were (1) publication of both absolute and spectrally resolved data on the optical properties and (2) the use of human blood from healthy adults for sample preparation. In case tabulated data were unavailable, the program GetData Graph Digitizer (v2.25.0.32) was used to obtain the digitized optical property spectra from the published graphs. The same criteria were applied for the inclusion and tabulation of literature spectra for μs and g, which will be considered in part II of this article.

Compiled literature spectrum of μa

All spectra were resampled to a 1-nm increment wavelength axis. Depending on the description of sample concentration in hct or total haemoglobin (tHb), the μa spectra were rescaled to a hct of 45 % or an equivalent tHb concentration of 150 g/L. Linear rescaling of μa spectra with respect to hct = X%, i.e. μa,hct = 45 % = (45/X) and μa,hct = X%, yields incorrect results if the absorption by the medium (water or plasma) cannot be neglected. This leads to an overestimation of the μa spectra at wavelengths where water absorption is substantial (λ > 1,100 nm). We therefore perform a correction for the water absorption on the linearly rescaled μa spectra: Here, μa,hct = 45 % is the rescaled μa spectrum to 45 % hct, μa,hct  is the literature μa spectrum at X% hct and μa,H2O is the absorption coefficient of pure water, for which we used the spectrum from Hale et al. [31]. The water volume fraction [fblood] in blood with hct = X% is obtained using:where fplasma and fRBC are the water volume fractions in blood plasma and red blood cells, respectively. In our analysis, we used fplasma = 0.90 and fRBC = 0.66, which correspond to normal physiological water concentrations in plasma and red blood cells [7]. Equations 1 and 2 show that the correct scaling between haematocrits at a given wavelength depends on the absorption coefficient of water at that wavelength. For the absorption spectra that were measured on non-scattering homogeneous haemoglobin solutions, also the absorption flattening effect should be taken into account when rescaling the μa to that of whole blood. Citing Friebel et al. [8], the absorption flattening effect can be described as: ‘when light passes through a suspension of absorbing particles, such as blood, photons that do not encounter red blood cells pass unattenuated by absorption. As a consequence, the transmitted light intensity is higher than it would be if all the haemoglobin were uniformly dispersed in the solution’, Duysens [32] quantitatively described the reduction of the absorption coefficient obtained from a suspension of particles, with respect to that of a solution in which in the same amounts of absorbing molecules are homogeneously distributed. Following the method of Duysens, adapting only the terminology, we arrive at: Where μa,blood and μa,Hb are the absorption coefficient of a blood sample and haemoglobin solution, respectively, and μa,RBC is the absorption coefficient of the hemoglobin solution inside the red blood cell. The last two absorption coefficients are related through the haematocrit, μa,Hb = Hct∙μa,RBC. The length dRBC is a typical dimension of a red blood cell. In this derivation, it was assumed that the RBCs can be represented by cubes with volume equal to an RBC (dRBC = 3√90 μm). Following the same approach, Finlay and Foster [33] derived a more complex version of Eq. 3, valid for equivolumetric spherical particles. Since the difference between both forms is neglicable for the present parameters, we adhere to the much simpler form of Eq. 3 throughout this manuscript. The compiled spectra of μa were obtained by averaging the rescaled spectra, with the exclusion of one outlier spectrum, as specified in the ‘Results’ section. The μa spectra for oxygenized (nine averages) and deoxygenized blood (three averages) were compiled separately.

Results

Optical property spectra of human blood in literature

The available literature on optical property measurements within our inclusion criteria is summarized in Table 1, with the relevant information (based on the factors of influence that have been listed in the ‘Factors influencing the optical properties of blood’ section) that was available on measurement method and sample preparation. All spectra from samples with intact red blood cells were obtained using integrating sphere measurements in combination with inverse Monte Carlo simulations. Phase functions that were applied in the analysis of these literature spectra included the Henyey–Greenstein [6], the Gegenbauer–Kernel [7] and the Reynolds–McCormick phase function [8-10]; details can be found in the respective references. The Gegenbauer–Kernel and the Reynolds–McCormick phase function cited in these publications are the same [34]. Compiled spectra of the absorption coefficient of Hb and HbO2 solutions are available from Zijlstra [4] and Prahl [5].
Table 1

Literature on the optical properties of blood in the visible and near-infrared

ReferenceWavelength range (nm)MethodSampleOptical properties
Zijlstra et al. [4]450–800Transmission spectrophotometerHb solution from haemolysed RBCs (human); SO2 = 0, 100 %; T = 20–24 °Cμa
Prahl [5]250–1,000Compiled data from Gratzer and KolliasHb solution from haemolysed RBCs; SO2 = 0, 100 %μa
Yaroslavsky et al. [6]700–1,200Double IS with inverse MC (PHG)Fresh heparinized whole blood (human); hct = 45–46 %, SO2 > 98 %; no flow, γ = 0 s−1μa, μs, g
Roggan et al. [7]400–2,500Double IS with inverse MC (PGK)Fresh RBCs (human) in phosphate buffer; hct = 5 %; SO2 = 0, 100 %; in flow, γ = 500 s−1; T = 20 °Cμa, μs, g
Friebel et al. [8]250–1,100IS with inverse MC (PRC)Fresh RBCs (human) in phosphate buffer; hct = 0.84, 42.1 %; SO2 > 99 %; in flow, γ = 600 s−1; T = 20 °Cμa, μs, g
Friebel et al. [9]250–2,000IS with inverse MC (PRC)Fresh RBCs (human) in phosphate buffer; hct = 33.2 %; SO2 = 0, 100 %; in flow, γ = 600 s−1; T = 20 °Cμa, μs, g
Meinke et al. [10]250–1,100IS with inverse MC (PRC)

Fresh RBCs (human) in phosphate buffer and saline solution/plasma various samples between hct = 0.84 and 42.1 %

(shown in Figs. 1, 3 and 4: hct = 8.6, 41.2 %); SO2 > 98 %; in flow, γ = 600 s−1; T = 20 °C

μa, μs, g

PGK and the PRC are identical phase functions [34].

IS integrating sphere, MC Monte Carlo, P Henyey–Greenstein phase function, P Gegenbauer–Kernel phase function, P Reynolds–McCormick phase function, RBCs red blood cells, hct haematocrit, SO oxygen saturation, γ shear rate, T temperature, μa absorption coefficient, μs scattering coefficient, g anisotropy factor

aThe μa spectra of Roggan are excluded from the compiled spectra, as discussed in ‘Compiled literature spectrum of ’ section

Literature on the optical properties of blood in the visible and near-infrared Fresh RBCs (human) in phosphate buffer and saline solution/plasma various samples between hct = 0.84 and 42.1 % (shown in Figs. 1, 3 and 4: hct = 8.6, 41.2 %); SO2 > 98 %; in flow, γ = 600 s−1; T = 20 °C
Fig. 1

Blood absorption coefficient spectra from literature (see Table 1) within our inclusion criteria, rescaled to hct = 45 %: aμa for oxygen saturation (SO2) > 98 %, bμa for SO2 = 0 %, c compiled μa spectra for whole blood with a haematocrit of 45 %. The jumps around 1,000 and 1,200 nm in the compiled spectra are artifacts of our compilation method (caused by the transition of the average of multiple spectra to only one spectrum), which can be ignored or smoothed when using these spectra in practice. The spectra from haemolysed blood (Zijlstra and Prahl) in a and b) have been corrected for absorption flattening, see legend

Fig. 3

a Scattering coefficient spectra of blood from literature (see Table 1) within our inclusion criteria, displayed for their original hcts (hct = X%). b Scaling factors for rescaling μs at hct = X% to hct = 45 %: linear, according to Twersky for gas (Eqs. 13 and 14 combined) and spheres (Eqs. 13 and 15 combined) [40, 41], according to Steinke et al. (Eqs. 13 and 16 combined) [11] and our new scaling relation according to Mie/Percus–Yevick theory (Eqs. 13 and 17 combined). c Rescaling of the literature μs spectra (SO2 > 98 %) from their original hct (X%) to hct = 45 % using Eqs. 13 and 17. d Compiled μs spectrum for whole blood (SO2 > 98 %) with a haematocrit of 45 % (i.e. the average of the spectra in Fig. 3c). For comparison, also the calculated μs spectra from Fig. 2b are displayed. The jump around 1200 nm in the compiled μs spectrum is an artifact of our compilation method (caused by the transition of the average of multiple spectra to fewer spectra), which can be ignored or smoothed when using these spectra in practice

Fig. 4

a Scattering anisotropy spectra of blood from literature (see Table 1) within our inclusion criteria, displayed for their original hcts. b Compiled spectrum for g; for comparison, also the g spectra from Fig. 2c are displayed. c Compiled μs′ spectrum for whole blood with a haematocrit of 45 %; for comparison, also the μs′ spectra from Fig. 2d are displayed. d Compiled and calculated μeff spectra spectrum for whole blood with a haematocrit of 45 %, for oxygenized (SO2 > 98 %) and deoxygenized blood (SO2 = 0 %)

PGK and the PRC are identical phase functions [34]. IS integrating sphere, MC Monte Carlo, P Henyey–Greenstein phase function, P Gegenbauer–Kernel phase function, P Reynolds–McCormick phase function, RBCs red blood cells, hct haematocrit, SO oxygen saturation, γ shear rate, T temperature, μa absorption coefficient, μs scattering coefficient, g anisotropy factor aThe μa spectra of Roggan are excluded from the compiled spectra, as discussed in ‘Compiled literature spectrum of ’ section Figure 1a, b displays the rescaled μa spectra to hct = 45 % for oxygenized blood (SO2 > 98 %) and deoxygenized blood (SO2 = 0 %), respectively. For both oxygenized and deoxygenized blood, the rescaled μa spectra of Roggan et al. [7] consistently overestimate the other μa spectra for nearly all wavelengths up to one order of magnitude. Roggan et al. obtained this overestimation with respect to pure haemoglobin and water solutions also for the original sample haematocrit of 5 %, and ascribed the difference to an increased probability of absorption due to elongated photon paths, resulting from internal photon reflections inside the red blood cells. When rescaling these values to hct = 45 %, the overestimation is magnified to unrealistically high values for μa, in spite of the applied correction for the water absorption. We therefore excluded the μa spectra of Roggan et al. from the compiled spectra. Blood absorption coefficient spectra from literature (see Table 1) within our inclusion criteria, rescaled to hct = 45 %: aμa for oxygen saturation (SO2) > 98 %, bμa for SO2 = 0 %, c compiled μa spectra for whole blood with a haematocrit of 45 %. The jumps around 1,000 and 1,200 nm in the compiled spectra are artifacts of our compilation method (caused by the transition of the average of multiple spectra to only one spectrum), which can be ignored or smoothed when using these spectra in practice. The spectra from haemolysed blood (Zijlstra and Prahl) in a and b) have been corrected for absorption flattening, see legend The spectra of haemolysed blood from Zijlstra [4] and Prahl [5] in Fig. 1a, b have been rescaled with the absorption flattening factor from Eq. 3. Unscaled, the μa spectrum of haemolised blood overestimates the absorption of both oxygenized and deoxygenized blood with approximately 10–20 % at the Soret band around 420 nm [5]. This difference has also been measured by Friebel et al. [8] when they compared their μa spectra from samples containing intact red blood cells to those containing haemolysed blood at exactly the same concentrations of haemoglobin. After correcting for the absorption flattening, the spectra are in good agreement with the absorption spectra from (whole) blood measurements. The compiled μa spectrum of oxygenized blood is composed of the average of N = 9 spectra (Fig. 1c). Due to the difficulty to fully deoxygenize blood (high oxygen affinity of haemoglobin), fewer literature spectra are available for deoxygenized blood—resulting in a compiled μa spectrum of the average of N = 3 spectra for deoxygenized blood (Fig. 1c). Note that the data from Friebel et al. [9] are the only data contributing to the compiled spectrum beyond 1,200 nm for oxygenized blood and beyond 1,000 nm for deoxygenized blood (indicated by the dashed lines in Fig. 1c). The sudden jumps in the compiled spectra at 1,200 and 1,000 nm are caused by this transition of the average of multiple spectra to only one spectrum that differs slightly in amplitude (∼0.1 mm−1) from the other spectra. We consider these jumps as artifacts of our compilation method, which can be ignored or smoothed when using these spectra in practice.

Part II: the scattering properties of whole blood

The determination of the scattering properties of whole blood is extremely challenging because assumptions on the applied scattering phase function are of high influence and the scaling of diluted blood measurements to physiological haematocrit values is not straightforward (‘Background’ section). In our previous work, we therefore proposed to use a ‘forward’ approach to estimate the light scattering properties from accurate measurements of the absorption coefficient of haemoglobin solutions, followed by Kramers–Kronig (KK) analysis and application of light scattering theory [17]. We expand on this theoretical approach here to include dependent scattering effects. In the first step, the complex refractive index is determined from the absorption coefficient of the contents of one red blood cell. This is used as input to scattering theory in the second step, accounting for inter-particle correlations due to high-volume fractions. This way, the theoretical scattering property spectra of blood can be calculated for any haematocrit at any wavelength. We use this theory to obtain calculated spectra for μs and g for whole blood with a haematocrit of 45 %. For practical convenience, we proceed to average the scaling factors for μs over wavelength, which leads to a simple expression depending on haematocrit only. This novel scaling relation is then used to rescale literature spectra of μs to a haematocrit of 45 %, from which we compile an average spectrum. Summarizing, in this part II of the article, we provide both calculated and compiled literature spectra for μs and g. From this, we calculate the reduced scattering coefficient μs′ and effective attenuation coefficient μeff for whole blood.

Theoretical estimation of μs and g

Kramers–Kronig analysis

Causality dictates a functional relationship between the real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index. This relation is expressed by the Kramers–Kronig integral dispersion equations. The imaginary part κ(ω) of the complex refractive index m(ω) = n(ω) + iκ(ω) is related to the absorption coefficient μa through:where c is the speed of light and ω is the angular frequency of the light. We use a subtractive KK equation [17, 35], so that:where n(ω0) is the refractive index at some reference frequency ω0, providing scaling of the calculated spectra. P denotes the Cauchy principle value of the integral. Thus, knowledge of the absorption spectrum of the haemoglobin solution inside an RBC, in combination with a reference value for the refractive index, allows determination of the complex refractive index of the solution at any given frequency ω (or wavelength λ = c/ω).

Scattering properties of red blood cells

The scattering properties of a single red blood cell (cross section and anisotropy) are calculated from the angularly resolved scattered intensity IS(θ), per unit input intensity [36]. The scattering cross section [in square metre] is given by:where k is the wave number k = 2π/λ. By normalization of IS(θ) on its 4π solid-angle domain, the phase function pP(θ) is obtained, which is parameterized by the expectation value of the cosine of the scattering angle, the scattering anisotropy g [−]: These scattering properties can be calculated if an appropriate theory is available to calculate IS(θ). A common approach yielding reasonable agreement with experiment [37] is to describe the RBC as a sphere with an equivalent volume (90 μm3, ‘Composition of human blood and its optical properties’ section) using Mie theory.

Scattering properties of whole blood

We model light scattering of a blood medium by the angular resolved scattered intensity of a collection of N randomly distributed, identical particles:where E* denotes the complex conjugate of E. The ensemble average runs over all possible arrangements of the particles in volume VT (that contains all particle contributing to the signal). Es, denotes the scattered field amplitude of the nth particle, located at r The scattering vector q has magnitude |q| = 2ksin(θ/2). The terms m = n in the double sum define the light distribution when no interference between the scattered fields from different particles occurs, e.g. in a dilute medium. This condition is called ‘independent scattering’, and the total scattering cross section is simply N times the scattering cross section of a single particle. The scattering coefficient (or density of the scattering cross section, [in meter]) follows from μs = σs,TOTAL/VT or:with hct the particle volume fraction and Vp the particle volume. If the particles are closely spaced, or when correlations between the particle positions are present, the interference effects cannot be ignored. This condition, usually called dependent scattering in the biomedical optics literature, takes into account the m ≠ n terms as well. Their contribution depends on the ordering in the arrangement of the particles, characterized by the radial distribution function G(r) which describes the probability of finding two particles spaced a difference r apart. We may write [38, 39]:where |q| = 2ksin(θ/2). The term S(θ,hct) is called the structure factor, which thus allows to describe the angular scattering pattern from an ensemble of particles in terms of the scattered intensity pattern of a single particle, by applying a hct-dependent angular weighting of the scattered light. Combining Eq. 10 with Eq. 6, the scattering cross section for dependent scattering is found as:where γ(hct) is the haematocrit-dependent scaling factor between the scattering cross section for dependent scattering and independent scattering, and pP(θ) is the single-particle phase function. The scattering coefficient follows as: Expressions for the phase function and scattering anisotropy for dependent scattering can also be derived using the same methods. Thus, the scattering properties of the blood medium can be calculated, provided a description for the radial distribution function G(r) is available (such as the Percus–Yevick model for non-deformable spheres used in this work). Scaling of the scattering coefficient between haematocrit values takes the following form for a blood medium:

Practical formula for haematocrit dependent scaling of μs

From the preceding analysis, it is clear that γ(hct)—the factor ultimately for non-linear scaling of the scattering coefficient with hct—can be a complicated function of wavelength because both S(θ,hct) and pP(θ) are wavelength dependent. However, some practical expressions for γ(hct), depending on haematocrit only, have been presented in the literature. The best known is Twersky’s formula, which starts with the structure factor of Eq. 10 and employs a ‘small particle’ assumption replacing S(θ,hct) with S(0,hct) and uses pP(θ) = (4π)−1 [40-42] so that the integral over the radial distribution function G(r) is evaluated at q = 0 (or θ = 0). Assuming scatterers of radius rp that do not attract or repulse each other (‘gas model’), we have G(r) = 0 (r ≤ rp); G(r) = 1 (r > rp). This leads to the simple expression: Following the same procedure using the radial distribution function of a collection of non-deformable small spheres gives: Both relations have been tested and have been found to be only in moderate agreement with experimental results on blood [11]. Based on their experiments, Steinke et al. therefore provide the following empirical relation: We compute γ(hct) at each wavelength using Eqs. 10 and 11 without restrictions on particle size, using the Mie phase function and the Percus–Yevick radial distribution function for non-deformable spheres. Averaging γ(hct, λ) over all wavelengths (250–2,000 nm) and both oxygenated forms and using a Levenberg–Marquardt non-linear least squares curve fitting procedure of γ(hct) versus hct yields the following approximation: For completeness, we give the equation relating the scattering coefficient of a blood sample (assuming dependent scattering) of given haematocrit to the scattering cross section of a single RBC as: Equations 17 and 18 are thus one of the main practical results of our work.

Calculated spectra of μs and g

To compute the complex refractive index of an RBC’s contents, we model the RBC as a sphere (90 μm3), containing a homogeneous solution of haemoglobin molecules. Hereto, we use the average of the oxygenized and deoxygenized μa spectra of haemolysed blood from Prahl and Zijlstra only (part I)—rescaled to the appropriate concentration (350 g/L per RBC; ‘Composition of human blood and its optical properties’ 2.1), but not corrected for absorption flattening. Using Eq. 4, the imaginary part of the complex refractive index is obtained. In the Kramers–Kronig analysis (Eq. 5), we use a reference measurement of the real part of the complex refractive index at 800 nm to scale the computed spectra. Details of this procedure can be found in our previous publication [17]. The obtained complex refractive index spectra of oxygenized and deoxygenized blood are then used as input for subsequent calculations. To implement the theory of Eqs. 6–13, a consistent combination of scattering theory and structure factor is needed. Here, we use the Mie theory [36] to calculate the scattered intensity and scattering properties by approximating a red blood cell with an equivolumetric sphere (r = 2.78 μm). Mie calculations also require specification of the refractive index of the medium in which the scattering particles are suspended (i.e. plasma). The refractive index of plasma has been determined experimentally by Streekstra et al. [43] at 633 nm and by Meinke et al. [9] at 400, 500, 600 and 700 nm. Since no data is available on the entire required wavelength range (including the near-infrared), we approximate the refractive index of plasma by that of water [31] with an additional offset to achieve a value of 1.345 at 633 nm [43]. This agrees well with the values of Meinke et al. in the visible wavelength range. We use the Percus–Yevick approximation [44], solved analytically by Wertheim [45], to calculate the structure factor of a suspension of non-deformable spheres. The exact descriptions of the Percus–Yevick radial distribution function can be found elsewhere, e.g. in Refs. [39, 45]. All calculations are performed using self-written routines in Labview. The Kramers–Kronig code is benchmarked against the routines available from Ref. [35]; the Mie code is benchmarked against the results from Prahl’s web-based Mie calculator [46].

Compiled literature spectra of μs and g

The available literature on optical property measurements of μs and g within our inclusion criteria (‘Methods’ section) is summarized in Table 1. All spectra were obtained using integrating sphere measurements in combination with inverse Monte Carlo simulations. Phase functions that were applied in the analysis of these literature spectra included the Henyey–Greenstein [6], the Gegenbauer–Kernel [7] and the Reynolds–McCormick phase function [8-10]; details can be found in the respective references. The Gegenbauer–Kernel and the Reynolds–McCormick phase functions cited in these publications are the same [34]. We rescaled the μs spectra from their original haematocrits (hct = X%) to a whole blood haematocrit of 45 % using Eqs. 13 and 17. From the rescaled spectra (N = 8), we compiled an average spectrum. The compiled spectrum of the anisotropy g was obtained from the average of the unscaled literature spectra of g (N = 9).

Scatter power analysis on μs

The scattering coefficient of most biological tissues exhibits a power law dependency on wavelength in the wavelength regions where μa is low with respect to μs. This power dependency can be described by:with scaling factor a (in millimetre), scatter power b (dimensionless), scattering coefficient μs (in millimetre), wavelength λ and reference wavelength λ0. To summarize the obtained μs spectra of blood, we determined the parameters a and b for both the calculated and compiled spectra. Hereto, we fitted Eq. 19 to the spectra beyond 700 nm with a least squares algorithm, using λ0 = 700 nm. Error estimations were obtained from the 95 % confidence intervals of the fits.

Reduced scattering μs′ and effective attenuation μeff

In general, studies that rely on the diffuse reflectance or transmittance of whole blood consider the reduced scattering coefficient μs′ = μs(1 − g) and the effective attenuation coefficient μeff = √[3μa(μa + μs′)], rather than the scattering coefficient μs and absorption coefficient μa only. Therefore, we present the compiled spectra of μs′ and μeff, using the compiled spectra from literature for μa, μs and g. We also present theory-derived spectra of μs′ and μeff, using the calculated spectra for μa, μs and g, with μa obtained as μa = μext − μs with μext the calculated extinction coefficient from Mie theory. Figure 2a shows the results of the Kramers–Kronig analysis to obtain the real part of the complex refractive index and for reference the experimental values obtained by Friebel et al. [30]. Also shown is the refractive index of plasma. Subpanels b and c of Fig. 2, respectively, show the calculated spectra of the scattering coefficient and anisotropy for both oxygenated and deoxygenated blood. Figure 2d shows the reduced scattering coefficient μs′, obtained from the calculated spectra of μs and g. Results of the same calculations using the refractive index from Friebel et al. as input are also shown.
Fig. 2

Theoretical analysis (Kramers–Kronig/Percus–Yevick) of the scattering properties of whole blood: a real part of the refractive index, b scattering coefficient, c scattering anisotropy (oxygenized and deoxygenized spectra overlap), d reduced scattering coefficient. For comparison, we also calculated the optical properties using the measured refractive index of aqueous haemoglobin (SO2 > 98 %) from Friebel et al. [30] (grey lines), instead of the calculated refractive index through the Kramers–Kronig analysis

Theoretical analysis (Kramers–Kronig/Percus–Yevick) of the scattering properties of whole blood: a real part of the refractive index, b scattering coefficient, c scattering anisotropy (oxygenized and deoxygenized spectra overlap), d reduced scattering coefficient. For comparison, we also calculated the optical properties using the measured refractive index of aqueous haemoglobin (SO2 > 98 %) from Friebel et al. [30] (grey lines), instead of the calculated refractive index through the Kramers–Kronig analysis

Compiled literature spectrum of μs

Figure 3a shows the unscaled literature spectra of μs at their original haematocrit values (all measured at SO2 > 98 %). To rescale these spectra to hct = 45 %, we apply our Mie/Percus–Yevick scaling relation (Eqs. 13 and 17 combined), which has been displayed in Fig. 3b. For comparison, also a linear scaling relation (hct/X) and the scaling relations of Twersky (Eqs. 13 and 14 combined and Eqs. 13 and 15 combined) [40, 41] and Steinke et al. (Eqs. 13 and 16 combined) [11] have been displayed. Figure 3c shows that the rescaled literature spectra using Eqs. 13 and 17 are much closer together in magnitude, compared to the unscaled spectra in Fig. 3a. The compiled average μs spectrum from the rescaled spectra (N = 8) agrees well in shape and magnitude with the calculated μs spectra for those wavelengths where scattering dominates absorption (beyond 700 nm, Fig. 3d). Comparable to the compiled spectrum of μa, the jump in μs around 1,200 nm is an artifact of our compilation method, caused by the transition of the average of multiple spectra to fewer spectra. a Scattering coefficient spectra of blood from literature (see Table 1) within our inclusion criteria, displayed for their original hcts (hct = X%). b Scaling factors for rescaling μs at hct = X% to hct = 45 %: linear, according to Twersky for gas (Eqs. 13 and 14 combined) and spheres (Eqs. 13 and 15 combined) [40, 41], according to Steinke et al. (Eqs. 13 and 16 combined) [11] and our new scaling relation according to Mie/Percus–Yevick theory (Eqs. 13 and 17 combined). c Rescaling of the literature μs spectra (SO2 > 98 %) from their original hct (X%) to hct = 45 % using Eqs. 13 and 17. d Compiled μs spectrum for whole blood (SO2 > 98 %) with a haematocrit of 45 % (i.e. the average of the spectra in Fig. 3c). For comparison, also the calculated μs spectra from Fig. 2b are displayed. The jump around 1200 nm in the compiled μs spectrum is an artifact of our compilation method (caused by the transition of the average of multiple spectra to fewer spectra), which can be ignored or smoothed when using these spectra in practice The scatter power analysis (Eq. 19) resulted in a values of 82.5 ± 0.2 mm−1 (calculated μs, SO2 > 98 %), 72.2 ± 0.2 mm−1 (calculated μs, SO2 = 0 %) and 91.8 ± 0.6 mm−1 (compiled μs, SO2 > 98 %) using reference λ0 = 700 nm. The scatter power b values were 1.23 ± 0.005 (calculated μs, SO2 > 98 %), 1.22 ± 0.006 (calculated μs, SO2 > 0 %) and 1.19±0.012 (compiled μs, SO2 > 98 %).

Compiled literature spectrum of g

Although a non-linear dependency of g on haematocrit has been reported (‘Background’ section), we do not perceive this effect in the literature spectra of g at the original haematocrit values (Fig. 4a). The compiled spectrum for g (Fig. 4b) is therefore obtained using all available, unscaled spectra (N = 9). Note that the data from Roggan et al. [7] are the only data contributing to the compiled spectrum beyond 2,000 nm (indicated by the dashed line in Fig. 4b). The large oscillations in g in this wavelength region are ascribed by Roggan et al. to ‘the small values of the measured quantities’, indicating a low signal-to-noise ratio for these wavelengths. Comparable to the compiled spectra of μa and μs, the jump in g around 1,200 nm is an artifact of our compilation method, caused by the transition of the average of multiple spectra to fewer spectra. The compiled literature spectrum of g agrees well in magnitude with the calculated spectra of g for those wavelengths where scattering dominates absorption (beyond 700 nm). a Scattering anisotropy spectra of blood from literature (see Table 1) within our inclusion criteria, displayed for their original hcts. b Compiled spectrum for g; for comparison, also the g spectra from Fig. 2c are displayed. c Compiled μs′ spectrum for whole blood with a haematocrit of 45 %; for comparison, also the μs′ spectra from Fig. 2d are displayed. d Compiled and calculated μeff spectra spectrum for whole blood with a haematocrit of 45 %, for oxygenized (SO2 > 98 %) and deoxygenized blood (SO2 = 0 %)

Reduced scattering and effective attenuation

Figure 4c shows the calculated and compiled reduced scattering coefficient spectra μs′, which were obtained using the calculated and compiled spectra of μs and g, respectively. Similar to the spectra of μs and g, the calculated and compiled μs′ spectra agree well in magnitude for those wavelengths where scattering dominates absorption (beyond 700 nm). Figure 4d shows the calculated and compiled effective attenuation coefficient spectra μeff. For the calculated spectrum of μeff, the absorption coefficient was calculated using Mie theory as the difference between the extinction coefficient and scattering coefficient (for both SO2 = 0 % and SO2 > 98 %). The compiled spectra were obtained using both the compiled spectrum for μa (part I) and the compiled spectrum for μs′ (only for SO2 > 98 %). The absorption coefficient dominates μeff. The excellent correspondence between the calculated and compiled spectra thus demonstrates that scattering theory is capable of including absorption flattening effects. The jumps in the 1,100–1,200 nm region and/or the oscillations beyond 2,000 nm in μs′ and μeff are caused by the compilation artifacts in μa, μs and g that have been explained above.

Final remarks

Tabulated data

In the Appendix of this article, we provide the tabulated data for the compiled spectra of μa (oxygenated and deoxygenated blood), μs and g. The table also includes the calculated spectra for μs and g (Kramers–Kronig/Percus–Yevick analysis for oxygenated and deoxygenated blood). All spectra are scaled to a haematocrit of 45 %. The data are presented with a resolution of 2 nm up to 600 nm and a resolution of 5 nm beyond 600 nm. From this, the calculated and compiled spectra for μs′ and μeff can easily be calculated. The full table can also be downloaded at our website www.biomedicalphysics.org.

Discussion

Compilation of optical property spectra from literature

In this article, we provided an overview of the available literature on the spectra of the optical properties (μa, μs and g) of whole blood. Hereto, we included only data that present quantitative spectra of these properties and were measured on human blood or dilutions thereof. These restrictions limit the available data to the seven contributions as listed in Table 1, from which five contributions are obtained from (dilutions of) whole blood (μa, μs and g), and two contributions are obtained from haemolysed blood (μa only). It should also be noted that experimental studies on the optical properties are scarce for wavelengths beyond 1,100 nm, compared to the visible and near-infrared wavelength range (λ < 1,100 nm). Hence, our compiled spectra beyond 1,100 nm are composed of only one (μa and μs) or two (g) literature spectra, which makes them more susceptible to experimental or methodological errors than the compiled values for λ < 1,100 nm. The compiled spectra for μs and g are largely dominated by the results from one research group (Roggan et al., Friebel et al. and Meinke et al. [7-10]), with three out of four literature spectra for μs and eight out of nine literature spectra for g. All spectra were obtained using integrating sphere setups, in combination with inverse Monte Carlo simulations (IS/iMC, to translate the measured diffuse reflectance and/or collimated and diffuse transmittance to values of μa, μs and g). The results of the inverse procedure depend highly on the phase function that is used in the Monte Carlo simulations. For the research group of Roggan et al., Friebel et al. and Meinke et al., the preferred phase function is the Reynolds–McCormick (also called Gegenbauer–Kernel [34]) phase function. The authors argue that this phase function has better correspondence with their measurements than the often used Henyey−Greenstein phase function or the Mie phase function. This result can be understood considering Eq. 10, which shows that the ‘effective phase function’ of a blood medium is given by the single RBC phase function, multiplied with the concentration-dependent structure factor. An additional drawback of inverse Monte Carlo procedures is that all parameters are optimized independently, whereas, following from causality, a correlation exists between all optical properties (i.e. the Kramers−Kronig relations). It would be beneficial to investigate the possibilities of other assessment techniques that avoid the methodological uncertainties (e.g. assumptions on phase function) that are associated with IS/iMC measurements. With optical coherence tomography (OCT), the non-diffusive component of the scattered light can be analysed, which facilitates quantification of the scattering properties, in addition to the absorption properties. With spectroscopic OCT [47, 48] and the closely related technique low-coherence spectroscopy (LCS), also the spectrally resolved optical properties can be quantified. LCS has been proven to give accurate estimations of μa and μs spectra in turbid media with relatively high attenuation (μa + μs up to 35 mm−1) both in vitro [49-51] and in vivo [52] in the visible wavelength range. Alternatively, methods that rely on the analysis of diffuse scattering from whole blood may be combined with other analysis models than the regular inverse Monte Carlo simulations.

Absorption flattening in whole blood: rescaling μa

For the haemolysed blood spectra that contribute to the compiled spectrum of μa for whole blood, we take into account the absorption flattening effect. This effect involves the reduction of the absorption coefficient of a suspension of absorbing particles (i.e. blood containing RBCs), compared to a homogeneous solution containing the same number of absorbing molecules (i.e. haemolysed blood). The first theoretical assessment of absorption flattening originates from Duysens [32] for cubical-, spherical- and arbitrary-shaped particles. We use the cubical description (Eq. 3), since it only slightly deviates from Duysens’ more comprehensive spherical particle approximation (which was reintroduced by Finlay and Foster [33]). The analysis of Duysens assumes random placement of the absorbing particles, with no correlations between their positions (Poisson distribution; so that the spatial variance σ2 of the number of particles equals the mean number μ of particles). Applying Beer’s law to each of the particles (and unit transmission for the ‘holes’) leads to the result of Eq. 3 upon averaging over all possible particle arrangements. If all particles were stacked together, σ2 would be 0 (without changing μ) and the measured transmission would correspond to that of a homogeneous solution of the absorbing molecules—without absorption flattening. Thus, σ2 ultimately determines the flattening effect. In a whole blood medium, possible correlations between the particle positions lead to an increase in σ2. This causes a further reduction in the measured absorption coefficient [53]. Interestingly, the increased σ2 is determined by the volume integral of the radial distribution function G(r) [54], describing spatial arrangement that leads to dependent scattering effects (part II). This clearly emphasizes that the organization of a medium/tissue is reflected in all measurable optical properties. From a practical point of view, Duysens’ simple model of ‘cubic absorbers’ excellently scales data from haemoglobin solutions to the compiled absorption spectrum of blood. The compartmentalization of haemoglobin in red blood cells causes the absorption flattening effect of blood absorption spectra compared to that of pure haemoglobin solutions. For techniques such as diffuse reflection spectroscopy, the same effect occurs on a larger scale because blood is not distributed homogeneously in tissue, but concentrated in vessels. Van Veen et al. [55] propose a correction factor introduced by Svaasand [56] that, interestingly, takes exactly the same form as Eq. 3 (but now with the vessel diameter as the length parameter instead of the diameter of the RBC), although it is derived in a completely different manner.

Dependent scattering in whole blood: rescaling μs

All literature spectra of μs were rescaled to a haematocrit of 45 % in the compilation of the average spectrum, while taking into account the effect of dependent scattering. Dependent scattering occurs when particles (i.e. RBCs) are closely spaced, or correlations exist between their positions. In that case, the phase relation between the fields scattered from different particles cannot be neglected. Therefore, the scattered fields should be added, rather than the scattered intensities. We choose a numerical, forward approach to assess the effect of dependent scattering, in which we calculate the scattering properties of blood using Mie theory (independent scattering) and Mie theory in combination with the Percus–Yevick radial distribution function G(r) (dependent scattering). This choice of theoretical descriptions essentially models blood as a high-concentration suspension of non-deformable spheres. This approach does not do full justice to the structural and rheological complexity of RBCs and blood. Future work on scattering formalisms, such as discrete dipole approximations [57] or models for G(r), can thus be employed using the same methodology. A main practical result of our work is the scaling factor γ(hct) that scales the scattering coefficients of independent scattering to dependent scattering. The most cited form in the literature is γ(hct) = 1 − hct (Eq. 14), proposed by Twersky [40]. However, in the derivation of this approximation, it is assumed that the scatterers are small and no correlations exist between their spatial positions—which is likely invalid for whole blood. Twersky’s scaling factor has been found in better agreement with experiments compared to linear haematocrit scaling (e.g. γ(hct) = 1), but other theoretical and empirical forms have been proposed, most importantly Eqs. 15 and 16. In this work, we propose γ(hct) = (1 − hct)2 as a practical approximation for the exactly calculated values from Mie/Percus–Yevick theory (Eq. 17). The agreement with the empirical form of Steinke et al. [11] is excellent.

Theoretical estimation of μs and g

In addition to the compiled spectra from literature, we also calculated the spectra of μs and g for whole blood, using only the absorption spectrum of blood as an input. The main advantage of this ‘forward approach’ to calculate these optical properties is that complicated measurements on whole blood are replaced by relatively straightforward absorption measurements on non-scattering haemoglobin solutions. However, both our calculations and whole blood measurements with IS/iMC require assumptions in the analysis method (as discussed for IS/iMC in ‘Compilation of optical property spectra from literature’ section). In our method, a choice for scattering theory and radial distribution function must be made. Our calculated spectra of the scattering coefficient μs are in reasonable agreement with the compiled spectra from literature (Fig. 3d). The order of magnitude is the same over the whole wavelength range that is considered, and all spectral features occur at the same wavelengths. The largest deviations are found in the wavelength range where the absorption of blood is strong compared to its scattering (250–600 nm). The same discrepancies are found in the spectrum of the scattering anisotropy g (Fig. 4b). Interestingly, these deviations are less prominent in the compounded parameters μs′ (reduced scattering coefficient, Fig. 4c) and μeff (effective scattering coefficient, Fig. 4d). Differences between the compiled and calculated spectra of μs and g may be caused either by false estimations of the phase function in the iMC analysis of the literature spectra and/or assumptions in our theoretical estimations. In general, the input to Mie theory (or any other scattering formalism) is the complex refractive index m(ω) = n(ω) + iκ(ω) of the particle and of the suspending medium. In our calculations, its real part is obtained via Kramers–Kronig transformation of the imaginary part, which in turn is obtained from the absorption coefficient of haemoglobin (Eqs. 4 and 5). Meinke et al. [10] also calculated the scattering properties of blood using the Mie theory, using the experimentally determined values of the real part of the refractive index from haemoglobin solutions by Friebel et al. [30] (Fig. 2a). These measurements suggest that it can be expected that the refractive index of haemoglobin solutions will increase for wavelengths <300 nm, similar to the refractive index of plasma/water. This is not found in our calculations because haemoglobin absorption spectra (and thus of the imaginary part of the refractive index) are only available down to 250 nm. If these spectra would be available down to wavelengths overlapping with the water absorption in the UV, a similar increase in the refractive index is expected to be found. For this reason, we caution the use of our calculated spectra below 300 nm. However, the values for the refractive index of haemoglobin solutions from Friebel et al. [30] are on average 0.02 higher in magnitude than the values found through our Kramers−Kronig analysis (Fig. 2a), which Friebel et al. ascribed to sample preparation. Applying the experimentally determined refractive index of Friebel et al. in our analysis would therefore result in unrealistically high values for μs (Fig. 2b).

Choosing between the compiled and calculated spectra

Since the primary aim of this review is to provide the reader with a set of optical property spectra for whole blood that can be used in the practice of biomedical optics, the question remains which spectra the reader should choose from the provided results. For μa, we present only compiled literature spectra of oxygenated blood and deoxygenated whole blood (Fig. 1c). Hence, our logical advice is to use these compiled spectra. For μs, g, μs′ and μeff however, we present both the compiled and the calculated Kramers–Kronig/Percus–Yevick spectra (Figs. 3d and 4b–d, respectively). The compiled spectra, as well as the calculated spectra rely on individual assumptions in their analysis. At present, we cannot assess which method provides the most reliable results. It is therefore difficult to draw any solid conclusions on the choice between the compiled and calculated spectra for μs, g, μs′ and μeff. In the wavelength below 600 nm, both the calculated and compiled experimental spectra of all optical properties show strong spectral fluctuations. This is expected, since the optical properties are strong functions of the complex refractive index. The real (n) and imaginary part (κ) of this quantity are interdependent on grounds of causality and as expressed by the Kramers–Kronig relations. The spectrum of κ can be easily obtained from the well-established absorption spectrum of haemoglobin solutions using Eq. 4. The spectrum of n is available through calculations (this work) and has been determined experimentally [30] as shown in Fig. 2a. Both methods show fluctuations in n(λ) around the large absorption peaks of haemoglobin with a modulation depth of 0.01–0.05 around their respective baseline values. To the best of our knowledge, no scattering theory applied to blood (cells) predicts the magnitude of the fluctuations in the compiled literature spectra of μs and particularly g using these input values. We hypothesize that this is largely due to the inverse Monte Carlo procedures as discussed in the ‘Compilation of optical property spectra from literature’ section. We therefore argue that our calculated spectra may provide a more consistent estimation of μs, g, μs′ and μeff for the wavelength range of 300–600 nm.

Conclusion

In this article, we provided a critical review, compilation and calculation of the optical properties of whole blood (hct = 45 %). An important conclusion from our review study is that the optical properties of blood are influenced by a large variety of factors of both physical and methodological origin (‘Factors influencing the optical properties of blood’ section). One should always be aware of these factors when relying on literature spectra of μa, μs and g or when performing one’s own optical property measurements on blood. For two important factors of influence—the effects of absorption flattening and dependent scattering—we provided practical formulas for rescaling literature spectra that have been obtained from haemolysed and diluted blood, respectively. Our theoretically derived formula for the influence of dependent scattering on μs is in good agreement with the previously reported empirical relation by Steinke et al. [11]. The main results of this article are the compiled spectra for the μa of oxygenized and deoxygenized whole blood (Fig. 1c) and both the compiled and calculated spectra for μs (Fig. 3d), g (Fig. 4b), μs′ (Fig. 4c) and μeff (Fig. 4d) of whole blood. We argue that our calculated spectra may provide a better estimation of μs, g, μs′ and μeff in the wavelength range of 300–600 nm. The compiled and/or calculated spectra of μa, μs and g have been tabulated in the Appendix of this article. From that, the spectra for μs′ and μeff can be easily calculated. With that, we hope that we have provided the reader with a set of optical property spectra for whole blood that can be used in the practice of biomedical optics.
Compiled averages from literature spectraKramers–Kronig/Percus–Yevick theory
Wavelengthμa, SO2 > 98 %μa, SO2 = 0 %μs, SO2 > 98 %g, SO2 > 98 %μs, SO2 > 98 %μs, SO2 = 0 %g, SO2 > 98 %g, SO2 = 0 %
[nm][mm−1][mm−1][mm−1][−][mm−1][mm−1][−][−]
25144.0248.3258.640.808822.477.000.99800.9981
25242.2948.8958.610.812636.6916.920.99780.9980
25443.5849.4758.350.814741.3421.010.99770.9979
25644.8950.2658.000.816444.9724.410.99760.9978
25846.3850.9557.360.818748.0727.570.99750.9978
26047.8951.5756.990.820050.9030.600.99740.9977
26249.4852.1956.600.820253.5233.550.99730.9976
26451.0052.8156.040.820256.0036.450.99720.9976
26652.2253.3255.260.820458.4139.310.99710.9975
26853.2953.8354.940.820560.8142.150.99700.9974
27054.1354.3454.630.821063.4045.010.99690.9973
27254.5954.6354.350.822266.1448.010.99670.9972
27454.9954.3254.420.823568.8051.060.99660.9971
27654.9753.9254.630.825171.2653.470.99650.9970
27854.6353.5654.820.828173.3055.280.99640.9970
28054.1453.1954.990.832475.6457.110.99630.9969
28253.3452.7755.180.837477.9659.030.99620.9968
28452.3052.0355.380.842880.4461.160.99610.9967
28650.4550.6755.560.849782.9563.320.99600.9967
28848.2248.7256.000.857885.6965.870.99600.9966
29046.1345.9456.720.864887.5668.800.99590.9965
29243.5843.0857.560.871390.1171.140.99580.9965
29440.5040.2958.460.879893.6173.390.99570.9964
29637.8237.4559.360.888996.3876.050.99570.9964
29835.1234.8160.110.897698.8578.160.99560.9963
30032.5233.1560.640.9035100.2779.570.99560.9963
30230.9932.1261.010.9084100.5079.870.99550.9962
30430.0131.2561.360.9142100.3380.000.99550.9962
30629.6930.4761.590.915999.7979.890.99550.9962
30829.7530.2861.280.916599.3179.220.99540.9961
31030.0330.9560.800.915998.7878.450.99540.9961
31230.7332.1060.240.914697.7377.500.99530.9961
31431.4933.2559.590.912996.7076.710.99530.9960
31632.4534.4358.900.908895.6876.030.99520.9960
31833.7635.6158.150.902994.8175.400.99520.9959
32035.1536.8657.500.897593.9674.720.99510.9959
32236.6138.2256.850.893893.0874.020.99500.9958
32438.0339.5056.310.890192.2273.430.99500.9957
32639.4940.6755.960.886191.4072.960.99490.9957
32840.9441.7055.590.883090.6272.640.99480.9956
33042.2942.6155.220.879789.9872.410.99470.9955
33243.4643.5154.730.877389.4972.120.99470.9955
33444.4844.4554.400.875889.2671.740.99460.9954
33645.4245.9454.190.874389.2571.050.99450.9954
33846.0247.5053.980.873589.2070.450.99440.9953
34046.4648.9053.800.872789.1770.120.99430.9952
34246.8649.8953.710.872089.2270.020.99420.9951
34447.2350.8153.630.871989.3769.860.99420.9951
34647.1451.7353.590.872489.9469.680.99410.9950
34846.7352.6853.540.873490.4469.440.99400.9949
35046.2953.7653.590.875090.9669.110.99390.9949
35245.8054.7353.840.877091.2568.580.99390.9948
35445.2455.6854.090.879391.4868.100.99380.9947
35644.3756.6254.370.881691.9067.720.99380.9947
35843.3657.2054.700.884192.5667.640.99370.9946
36042.3857.7454.590.886392.9267.520.99370.9945
36241.6758.1054.340.888193.0567.390.99370.9945
36441.2258.4354.080.889793.0367.250.99370.9944
36640.8658.7653.680.891392.6667.070.99360.9944
36840.7259.1053.230.892092.0666.840.99360.9943
37041.1459.4452.880.892290.9266.570.99360.9943
37242.0959.7452.490.891589.1966.260.99360.9942
37443.1460.0452.000.890287.5265.930.99360.9941
37644.2660.3451.330.887985.7865.560.99360.9941
37845.8760.6750.590.885183.8565.150.99360.9941
38047.8661.2849.790.879881.5764.710.99350.9940
38250.3861.7348.640.874179.1064.170.99350.9940
38454.3162.8347.420.867576.4862.970.99350.9940
38657.7264.2646.070.860373.6361.590.99350.9939
38862.5865.7544.930.847470.2460.160.99340.9939
39068.3367.7543.940.837966.2658.390.99340.9938
39273.6271.0143.030.825762.7256.430.99320.9937
39479.0774.0942.330.812759.8554.900.99310.9937
39684.0076.9541.770.796757.7753.610.99290.9936
39888.5679.7841.170.786356.0952.390.99280.9935
40093.0782.5440.120.773454.3251.160.99260.9934
40297.4085.5941.270.786652.3149.550.99250.9933
404101.8289.2140.250.776949.5247.830.99240.9932
406106.1692.7339.490.772645.7746.470.99220.9930
408110.7396.0938.900.765742.8345.360.99160.9929
410113.8199.8738.600.760442.4444.390.99100.9927
412116.09104.2138.950.757542.7443.430.99040.9926
414117.97108.9239.870.758543.6242.460.98960.9924
416118.04114.0341.090.760645.5941.740.98900.9922
418117.22119.6242.380.765747.6841.180.98830.9919
420115.39125.1043.910.774251.3540.780.98760.9916
422111.45131.5246.420.789656.0840.430.98720.9914
424106.30139.3749.900.802061.9340.060.98700.9910
426100.61145.3052.740.814168.0340.400.98690.9906
42894.94151.0155.610.829074.0040.720.98700.9901
43089.18155.6257.550.839079.9440.890.98700.9896
43282.69159.3160.510.856885.9541.690.98710.9889
43474.61158.3062.650.871095.7943.480.98730.9882
43666.95156.9364.740.8820102.9445.580.98770.9873
43858.47133.7366.400.8928105.6350.050.98800.9865
44051.07118.3368.830.9026109.2757.640.98820.9862
44246.60107.8870.390.9220111.2963.540.98830.9860
44442.2488.8472.820.9302113.6573.810.98850.9861
44638.2174.3073.790.9343114.4781.660.98860.9862
44834.2654.7475.050.9392116.3894.610.98870.9863
45031.4833.8177.200.9447116.55118.290.98880.9869
45229.4225.9478.010.9488117.24125.060.98880.9878
45427.6619.8278.820.9520118.02128.160.98890.9884
45626.0017.0479.420.9544118.52127.520.98890.9888
45824.4713.6180.170.9567118.65126.750.98900.9890
46022.8211.4580.310.9587118.94125.600.98900.9892
46221.3310.3780.370.9611119.16124.500.98900.9894
46420.109.6480.850.9634119.13123.310.98900.9895
46618.979.1281.740.9651119.26122.080.98900.9896
46817.938.6582.770.9665119.26120.900.98900.9897
47017.058.2982.610.9677119.15119.730.98910.9897
47216.307.9983.210.9684119.01118.600.98910.9898
47415.717.7983.500.9690118.85117.420.98910.9898
47615.167.6083.810.9695118.63116.300.98910.9898
47814.637.4484.990.9700118.38115.200.98900.9898
48014.157.3186.130.9705118.12114.140.98900.9898
48213.677.4386.480.9714117.80113.050.98900.9899
48413.307.5686.750.9723117.42112.000.98900.9899
48612.927.6986.800.9731117.03110.990.98900.9899
48812.547.8686.810.9738116.65110.000.98900.9899
49012.238.1087.020.9743116.26108.960.98900.9898
49211.948.3587.520.9748115.89107.960.98890.9898
49411.658.6088.310.9752115.52106.990.98890.9898
49611.378.8788.750.9756115.13106.040.98890.9898
49811.199.1788.870.9759114.73105.100.98880.9898
50011.059.5088.630.9761114.28104.160.98880.9898
50210.909.8888.230.9762113.83103.250.98880.9897
50410.7410.2587.750.9762113.35102.360.98880.9897
50610.5910.6486.350.9762112.88101.490.98880.9897
50810.5210.9985.750.9762112.32100.650.98870.9896
51010.5511.4185.430.9763111.7199.820.98870.9896
51210.7411.9185.030.9764111.0599.010.98870.9896
51411.0912.4284.540.9765110.2998.210.98860.9895
51611.5912.9283.740.9765109.4197.440.98860.9895
51812.3413.4382.610.9763108.3296.680.98860.9894
52013.2613.9881.420.9760107.1595.930.98860.9894
52214.3614.5079.880.9756105.8195.160.98860.9894
52415.6215.2278.060.9751104.3794.370.98850.9893
52617.1716.0476.690.9744102.8793.590.98850.9893
52819.2016.9675.280.9728101.3792.830.98840.9892
53020.9117.8273.830.970799.9192.080.98830.9892
53222.4818.6672.780.968798.6591.340.98830.9891
53423.9119.5171.830.966897.6790.600.98820.9891
53625.1720.3771.100.965096.9389.880.98810.9890
53826.2221.2570.590.963796.4489.180.98800.9890
54027.1322.1370.140.962796.2788.500.98790.9889
54227.3123.1969.930.962596.4387.870.98780.9888
54426.7924.0169.890.962596.9887.300.98770.9887
54626.0624.7770.340.962797.7986.810.98760.9887
54825.1525.4570.860.963398.8086.450.98750.9886
55023.8625.9971.490.964299.8086.200.98740.9885
55222.5426.3872.270.9652100.4685.890.98740.9884
55421.3426.7073.120.9664100.8685.660.98740.9884
55620.2926.8073.700.9677100.9885.560.98740.9883
55819.5526.7174.100.9690100.7185.540.98740.9883
56019.1226.5674.130.9694100.2585.590.98730.9882
56219.4726.0073.630.969699.5085.770.98730.9881
56420.1425.3872.900.969398.4285.970.98730.9880
56621.0424.7472.040.968797.0786.170.98730.9880
56822.5624.0670.980.968195.5386.390.98720.9879
57024.3823.2970.020.967793.9586.590.98720.9879
57225.6222.3869.200.967492.5386.760.98710.9878
57426.7021.4368.820.967091.5686.910.98700.9878
57627.2020.4968.840.966691.4487.140.98690.9878
57826.8719.6469.090.966392.3787.450.98670.9877
58025.7518.8770.070.966294.2887.720.98650.9876
58223.2918.0872.110.966996.7787.970.98640.9876
58420.0617.2774.680.968099.5388.240.98630.9875
58616.5116.3377.420.9692101.9588.550.98620.9874
58812.6815.3079.880.9708103.8188.960.98620.9874
5909.7214.2181.670.9724105.0289.500.98620.9873
5927.3213.1283.130.9743105.6990.030.98620.9872
5945.6611.9284.670.9759105.9590.540.98620.9872
5964.4810.6085.580.9774105.9490.980.98620.9871
5983.609.2986.210.9784105.7491.350.98620.9871
6002.627.5386.880.9794105.4991.560.98610.9871
6051.515.5587.890.9809104.0290.960.98610.9870
6100.884.0788.090.9815102.4990.120.98600.9869
6150.633.2788.090.9820101.0489.040.98600.9869
6200.462.8288.280.982399.6487.850.98590.9868
6250.352.4888.500.982498.3086.660.98590.9867
6300.282.2788.550.982697.5086.010.98570.9866
6350.242.1088.630.982796.7585.380.98560.9864
6400.201.9888.840.982796.0184.750.98540.9863
6450.171.8988.550.982695.3084.150.98530.9862
6500.161.8088.010.982594.6183.560.98520.9861
6550.161.7187.720.982593.4482.500.98510.9859
6600.151.6487.610.982692.2981.450.98500.9858
6650.141.5887.510.982891.1680.440.98490.9857
6700.141.5187.250.983290.0679.450.98480.9856
6750.141.4386.820.983088.9878.470.98470.9855
6800.141.3586.610.983187.9177.510.98460.9854
6850.141.2686.570.983486.8776.570.98450.9853
6900.131.1786.350.983585.8475.630.98430.9852
6950.131.1086.180.983584.8374.710.98420.9850
7000.141.0085.700.983683.8673.820.98410.9849
7050.140.9383.700.983783.3573.400.98400.9848
7100.170.8783.330.984182.8773.000.98380.9847
7150.170.8082.990.984082.4072.610.98370.9845
7200.180.7582.570.983981.9472.220.98350.9843
7250.190.7282.180.983981.4671.820.98330.9841
7300.200.7081.640.983980.5770.990.98310.9840
7350.210.7081.090.983979.6770.130.98310.9839
7400.220.7280.660.983978.7869.290.98300.9838
7450.230.7680.400.983877.9068.450.98290.9837
7500.240.8180.220.983777.0467.620.98270.9836
7550.260.8579.850.983676.1966.840.98260.9834
7600.270.8479.410.983575.3666.100.98240.9832
7650.290.8078.930.983574.5465.390.98230.9831
7700.300.7378.420.983373.7364.690.98220.9830
7750.310.6678.000.983272.9564.010.98210.9829
7800.330.5977.610.983272.5963.730.98190.9827
7850.340.5477.190.983272.2563.470.98180.9826
7900.360.5176.820.983271.9263.200.98160.9824
7950.370.4876.770.983171.5962.940.98140.9822
8000.380.4776.730.983371.2762.680.98120.9820
8050.390.4676.470.983270.5362.000.98100.9818
8100.400.4576.100.983369.8061.330.98090.9817
8150.420.4475.700.983369.0860.660.98080.9816
8200.430.4475.480.983468.3660.000.98070.9815
8250.450.4375.270.983567.6659.350.98060.9814
8300.460.4375.060.983566.9658.720.98040.9812
8350.470.4374.830.983466.2858.090.98030.9811
8400.480.4374.650.983465.6157.480.98010.9809
8450.480.4374.510.983364.9556.870.97990.9807
8500.490.4274.200.983264.3356.300.97980.9806
8550.510.4373.580.983164.0656.080.97960.9804
8600.510.4372.870.983163.8255.880.97940.9803
8650.520.4372.430.983163.5855.690.97930.9801
8700.530.4372.290.983063.3555.500.97910.9799
8750.550.4372.120.982963.0955.290.97890.9797
8800.560.4471.630.982862.5054.760.97880.9796
8850.560.4570.790.982861.9054.200.97860.9794
8900.560.4570.070.982661.3053.660.97840.9792
8950.560.4669.410.982460.7253.120.97820.9791
9000.560.4668.860.982460.1452.590.97810.9789
9050.570.4768.350.982359.5752.070.97800.9788
9100.570.4768.070.982059.0051.560.97780.9787
9150.570.4767.820.982058.4451.050.97770.9786
9200.570.4767.540.981957.8950.550.97760.9784
9250.650.4667.240.981857.3850.090.97740.9783
9300.650.4566.860.981557.1849.930.97720.9780
9350.650.4466.420.981257.0149.810.97700.9778
9400.650.4366.080.981156.8449.660.97680.9776
9450.650.4165.670.981056.6749.550.97660.9774
9500.650.3965.210.980856.4749.400.97630.9772
9550.650.3864.780.980555.9948.970.97620.9770
9600.660.3664.380.980155.4848.510.97600.9769
9650.680.3463.950.980054.9748.060.97590.9767
9700.690.3263.580.979954.4847.620.97580.9766
9750.690.3163.200.979853.9947.180.97560.9765
9800.680.2962.680.979853.5146.740.97550.9763
9850.670.2662.270.979853.0446.310.97540.9762
9900.660.2562.090.979852.5845.890.97520.9760
9950.650.2362.000.980052.1145.470.97500.9758
1,0000.640.2261.830.980151.6645.040.97480.9756
1,0050.660.3161.690.980151.3244.740.97460.9754
1,0100.650.2861.620.980151.0144.460.97440.9752
1,0150.630.2861.570.980050.6944.180.97420.9750
1,0200.610.2861.460.980050.3843.900.97400.9748
1,0250.600.2761.180.980050.0743.620.97380.9747
1,0300.580.2460.850.980049.7643.350.97370.9745
1,0350.560.2460.490.980049.4643.080.97360.9744
1,0400.530.2360.350.980049.1642.810.97340.9743
1,0450.500.2260.310.980048.8642.550.97330.9741
1,0500.490.2260.150.980048.5642.280.97310.9739
1,0550.480.2259.870.980048.2742.020.97290.9737
1,0600.460.2159.530.979947.9741.770.97270.9735
1,0650.450.2059.260.979947.6941.520.97240.9732
1,0700.420.1959.040.979947.4141.270.97220.9730
1,0750.400.1958.730.980047.1341.020.97200.9728
1,0800.370.1858.340.980246.8540.780.97180.9726
1,0850.350.1758.080.980146.5840.540.97160.9724
1,0900.340.1757.980.980246.3040.300.97140.9722
1,0950.340.1657.890.980446.0240.060.97120.9721
1,1000.350.1557.810.979745.7439.820.97110.9719
1,1050.330.1557.580.983445.4839.590.97090.9718
1,1100.330.1657.660.983245.2139.360.97080.9716
1,1150.330.1557.670.983244.9539.130.97060.9715
1,1200.310.1457.720.983244.6938.900.97040.9713
1,1250.320.1457.530.982944.4338.680.97030.9711
1,1300.310.1357.260.982844.1838.450.97000.9709
1,1350.300.1557.780.983243.9238.230.96980.9706
1,1400.300.1657.930.983543.6738.010.96960.9704
1,1450.290.1857.720.983443.4337.790.96940.9702
1,1500.300.1957.510.983243.1837.580.96910.9699
1,1550.310.2157.330.983042.9437.370.96890.9697
1,1600.320.2157.050.982942.6937.160.96870.9695
1,1650.320.2156.820.982842.4636.960.96850.9693
1,1700.320.2156.550.982742.2236.760.96830.9691
1,1750.320.2156.210.982741.9936.560.96810.9689
1,1800.330.2155.550.982741.7636.360.96790.9688
1,1850.330.2155.410.982741.5436.170.96770.9686
1,1900.340.2155.480.982741.3135.970.96760.9684
1,1950.350.2055.370.982741.0935.780.96740.9683
1,2000.360.2055.200.982640.8835.590.96720.9681
1,2050.370.2055.160.982640.7035.400.96710.9679
1,2100.200.2050.160.978440.4835.220.96690.9677
1,2150.200.2049.980.978440.2535.030.96670.9675
1,2200.200.1949.810.978440.0434.850.96650.9673
1,2250.190.1949.430.978439.8234.670.96630.9671
1,2300.180.1749.210.978439.6134.490.96600.9668
1,2350.180.1749.250.978439.4034.310.96580.9666
1,2400.180.1749.190.978339.1934.130.96550.9664
1,2450.180.1747.970.978238.9933.960.96530.9661
1,2500.170.1747.510.978138.7933.780.96510.9659
1,2550.170.1748.180.978138.5833.610.96480.9656
1,2600.170.1748.640.978338.3833.440.96460.9654
1,2650.170.1547.360.978138.1933.270.96430.9652
1,2700.150.1446.500.977537.9933.100.96410.9650
1,2750.160.1547.090.977437.7932.930.96390.9648
1,2800.180.1647.910.977837.5932.760.96380.9646
1,2850.170.1647.130.977837.4032.590.96360.9645
1,2900.160.1646.210.977837.2132.430.96340.9643
1,2950.180.1845.770.977837.0132.260.96330.9641
1,3000.190.2045.360.977936.8232.090.96310.9640
1,3050.200.2144.790.978036.6331.930.96290.9638
1,3100.210.2244.210.977636.4431.760.96280.9636
1,3150.220.2343.950.977236.2531.600.96260.9634
1,3200.240.2643.910.976936.0631.430.96240.9632
1,3250.260.2943.640.976635.8731.270.96220.9630
1,3300.290.3143.380.976835.6831.110.96190.9627
1,3350.320.3443.850.977135.4930.950.96170.9625
1,3400.350.3744.370.977535.3130.800.96140.9622
1,3450.370.3744.020.977535.1330.650.96110.9619
1,3500.390.3843.680.977134.9530.490.96090.9617
1,3550.420.4143.000.976434.7630.330.96060.9614
1,3600.450.4342.320.975434.5830.170.96030.9611
1,3650.500.5141.090.974434.3829.990.96010.9609
1,3700.590.6540.310.973634.1829.810.95980.9607
1,3750.720.7840.800.973833.9729.640.95960.9604
1,3800.880.9241.690.974133.7729.480.95940.9602
1,3851.071.0541.210.974333.5729.320.95920.9600
1,3901.301.2040.430.974133.3729.160.95900.9599
1,3951.461.3539.590.973333.2029.010.95880.9597
1,4001.621.4939.210.972533.0428.860.95860.9595
1,4051.781.7139.090.971532.9028.740.95850.9594
1,4101.941.8338.980.970732.7828.630.95830.9592
1,4152.041.9439.090.969932.6728.530.95810.9590
1,4202.132.0839.080.969532.5628.430.95790.9588
1,4252.242.2738.200.969432.4528.330.95770.9586
1,4302.332.3638.150.969732.3528.260.95750.9584
1,4352.382.4338.110.969232.2628.190.95730.9582
1,4402.382.5038.010.968632.1828.120.95710.9579
1,4452.402.5137.530.968332.1028.070.95680.9576
1,4502.412.4837.050.968532.0228.010.95650.9574
1,4552.402.4437.240.968631.9427.960.95630.9571
1,4602.382.3737.360.968531.8627.910.95600.9568
1,4652.402.3537.110.968231.7827.840.95570.9565
1,4702.342.3336.850.968431.7227.780.95540.9562
1,4752.272.2936.770.968931.6527.720.95510.9559
1,4802.202.2436.720.969331.5927.670.95480.9556
1,4852.062.1736.320.968431.5427.610.95450.9553
1,4901.892.0735.910.968131.4827.570.95420.9550
1,4951.781.9535.700.968231.3927.520.95390.9548
1,5001.711.8235.560.968331.3127.460.95370.9545
1,5051.631.7335.190.968531.2327.390.95340.9543
1,5101.501.6335.070.968731.1527.320.95310.9540
1,5151.391.5434.990.969031.0627.250.95290.9538
1,5201.341.4934.980.969330.9727.180.95270.9536
1,5251.271.4234.880.968830.8727.110.95250.9534
1,5301.211.3334.720.968330.7827.040.95230.9532
1,5351.151.2334.540.968630.6826.970.95210.9530
1,5401.111.1434.330.968830.5926.900.95190.9528
1,5451.071.0934.110.968530.4926.810.95170.9526
1,5501.031.0533.980.968330.4026.730.95140.9524
1,5550.971.0133.900.968630.3126.650.95130.9522
1,5600.910.9733.820.968330.2226.570.95100.9520
1,5650.850.9233.730.968530.1226.490.95080.9518
1,5700.820.8733.630.969430.0226.420.95060.9515
1,5750.790.8233.530.969129.9226.340.95040.9513
1,5800.750.7833.370.968829.8226.250.95020.9511
1,5850.730.7532.930.968429.7326.170.94990.9508
1,5900.720.7132.600.968329.6326.090.94970.9506
1,5950.700.6932.550.968229.5326.010.94950.9503
1,6000.690.6732.480.968129.4325.930.94920.9501
1,6050.670.6532.440.968129.3625.870.94890.9498
1,6100.660.6432.400.968229.2825.810.94860.9495
1,6150.640.6232.320.968329.2125.740.94830.9492
1,6200.640.6232.210.968429.1425.680.94800.9489
1,6250.630.6131.760.968429.0625.620.94770.9486
1,6300.630.6131.500.968528.9925.560.94740.9483
1,6350.620.6131.380.968528.9225.500.94710.9480
1,6400.620.6131.210.968528.8525.450.94680.9477
1,6450.620.6031.080.968428.7825.390.94650.9473
1,6500.600.5931.020.968228.7125.330.94620.9470
1,6550.580.5731.100.968128.6425.280.94590.9467
1,6600.570.5631.170.967928.5725.220.94560.9465
1,6650.570.5630.970.967128.5025.160.94530.9462
1,6700.570.5630.750.966328.4225.100.94500.9459
1,6750.570.5630.480.966328.3525.040.94470.9456
1,6800.570.5630.230.966328.2824.980.94440.9454
1,6850.570.5730.020.966228.2124.930.94420.9451
1,6900.580.5829.810.966028.1424.870.94390.9449
1,6950.590.5829.660.966028.0724.810.94370.9446
1,7000.600.5929.650.966028.0024.750.94340.9444
1,7050.600.5929.750.966027.9324.690.94320.9442
1,7100.610.6029.750.966027.8624.640.94300.9440
1,7150.610.6129.400.966027.7924.580.94280.9437
1,7200.620.6129.080.965927.7224.520.94250.9435
1,7250.620.6228.890.965827.6524.460.94230.9433
1,7300.640.6328.710.965727.5824.410.94210.9431
1,7350.650.6428.550.965527.5024.350.94190.9429
1,7400.670.6528.490.965327.4324.290.94170.9427
1,7450.690.6628.560.965127.3624.230.94150.9425
1,7500.710.6828.620.965027.2924.170.94130.9423
1,7550.740.7228.430.965227.2224.100.94110.9420
1,7600.760.7528.230.964927.1524.040.94080.9418
1,7650.780.7928.000.964027.0823.990.94060.9416
1,7700.810.8127.760.963327.0123.930.94040.9413
1,7750.830.8227.590.963426.9423.880.94010.9410
1,7800.840.8327.490.963526.8723.820.93980.9407
1,7850.860.8427.550.964626.8023.770.93950.9404
1,7900.880.8427.600.966326.7423.710.93920.9401
1,7950.880.8427.370.965126.6723.660.93890.9398
1,8000.870.8427.140.963926.6123.600.93860.9395
1,8050.860.8326.890.962826.5623.560.93830.9392
1,8100.840.8426.650.962926.5123.510.93790.9388
1,8150.830.8426.550.963026.4623.460.93760.9385
1,8200.810.8426.570.963926.4023.410.93720.9381
1,8250.790.8526.650.964726.3423.360.93690.9378
1,8300.780.8826.560.964326.2723.290.93650.9374
1,8350.780.9026.330.964026.1923.230.93620.9370
1,8400.800.9426.110.963026.1123.150.93580.9367
1,8450.800.9725.970.961026.0123.070.93550.9364
1,8500.871.0225.750.962225.8922.970.93510.9360
1,8551.101.2125.520.961925.7522.840.93480.9357
1,8601.401.8125.230.961025.5922.680.93450.9355
1,8651.782.1924.790.959125.4322.530.93420.9352
1,8702.162.6524.350.959725.2622.410.93390.9349
1,8753.033.2423.960.961525.0522.270.93370.9346
1,8803.903.9923.570.959724.8922.130.93340.9344
1,8854.605.0523.770.954024.7722.010.93320.9341
1,8905.305.8924.160.947924.6821.960.93290.9339
1,8956.166.5624.030.942124.6121.980.93260.9336
1,9007.107.0023.900.936124.5822.020.93240.9333
1,9057.407.3323.960.932624.6322.080.93210.9330
1,9107.697.4124.270.924424.6922.180.93180.9327
1,9158.017.4124.480.915624.7722.260.93150.9325
1,9208.087.4124.250.909624.8622.330.93120.9322
1,9258.137.5724.150.911324.9522.380.93090.9320
1,9308.177.7024.260.912225.0422.440.93070.9317
1,9358.227.8424.030.908125.1422.510.93040.9314
1,9407.977.7323.750.905225.2722.620.93010.9312
1,9457.797.5723.540.914125.3822.720.92980.9309
1,9507.587.4123.320.919725.4922.820.92960.9306
1,9557.347.2523.060.915925.5822.910.92930.9304
1,9607.117.0722.690.911025.6823.000.92900.9301
1,9656.876.8522.630.914725.7723.100.92870.9298
1,9706.636.6322.630.920625.8623.190.92840.9295
1,9756.406.4122.320.926725.9523.290.92820.9292
1,9806.176.1922.150.928226.0523.380.92790.9289
1,9856.006.0422.240.926926.1623.500.92750.9286
1,9905.865.8822.270.929126.3023.640.92720.9282
1,9955.725.7322.260.934926.5323.880.92680.9278
2,0000.9370
2,0050.9291
2,0100.9249
2,0150.9366
2,0200.9390
2,0250.9404
2,0300.9448
2,0350.9560
2,0400.9568
2,0450.9539
2,0500.9438
2,0550.9479
2,0600.9526
2,0650.9545
2,0700.9545
2,0750.9532
2,0800.9506
2,0850.9466
2,0900.9449
2,0950.9481
2,1000.9512
2,1050.9535
2,1100.9522
2,1150.9418
2,1200.9311
2,1250.9255
2,1300.9219
2,1350.9236
2,1400.9238
2,1450.9204
2,1500.9191
2,1550.9233
2,1600.9399
2,1650.9430
2,1700.9413
2,1750.9348
2,1800.9255
2,1850.9245
2,1900.9257
2,1950.9341
2,2000.9381
2,2050.9424
2,2100.9434
2,2150.9291
2,2200.9198
2,2250.9311
2,2300.9544
2,2350.9442
2,2400.9335
2,2450.9427
2,2500.9611
2,2550.9627
2,2600.9609
2,2650.9521
2,2700.9420
2,2750.9418
2,2800.9431
2,2850.9275
2,2900.9145
2,2950.9311
2,3000.9422
2,3050.9499
2,3100.9525
2,3150.9550
2,3200.9569
2,3250.9576
2,3300.9583
2,3350.9551
2,3400.9443
2,3450.9426
2,3500.9433
2,3550.9616
2,3600.9746
2,3650.9751
2,3700.9664
2,3750.9648
2,3800.9639
2,3850.9426
2,3900.9218
2,3950.9218
2,4000.9258
2,4050.9363
2,4100.9433
2,4150.9391
2,4200.9286
2,4250.9334
2,4300.9545
2,4350.9532
2,4400.9524
2,4450.9589
2,4500.9702
2,4550.9692
2,4600.9645
2,4650.9624
2,4700.9607
2,4750.9612
2,4800.9616
2,4850.9596
2,4900.9581
2,4950.9598
2,5000.9613
  42 in total

1.  Theoretical and experimental investigation of the extinction in a dense distribution of particles: nonlocal effects.

Authors:  L Hespel; S Mainguy; J J Greffet
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Identification and age estimation of blood stains on colored backgrounds by near infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Gerda Edelman; Vicky Manti; Saskia M van Ruth; Ton van Leeuwen; Maurice Aalders
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Optical coherence tomography to investigate optical properties of blood during coagulation.

Authors:  Xiangqun Xu; Jia Lin; Feifei Fu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Light scattering by red blood cells in ektacytometry: Fraunhofer versus anomalous diffraction.

Authors:  G J Streekstra; A G Hoekstra; E J Nijhof; R M Heethaar
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  Comparison of Mie theory and the light scattering of red blood cells.

Authors:  J M Steinke; A P Shepherd
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1988-10-01       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Quantitative interpretations of Visible-NIR reflectance spectra of blood.

Authors:  Yulia M Serebrennikova; Jennifer M Smith; Debra E Huffman; German F Leparc; Luis H García-Rubio
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Light absorption of (oxy-)hemoglobin assessed by spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Dirk J Faber; Egbert G Mik; Maurice C G Aalders; Ton G van Leeuwen
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.776

8.  Quantitative analysis of optical properties of flowing blood using a photon-cell interactive Monte Carlo code: effects of red blood cells' orientation on light scattering.

Authors:  Daisuke Sakota; Setsuo Takatani
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Absorption and multiple scattering by biological suspensions.

Authors:  V Twersky
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1970-08

10.  Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-microm Wavelength Region.

Authors:  G M Hale; M R Querry
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1973-03-01       Impact factor: 1.980
View more
  87 in total

1.  Monte Carlo investigation on quantifying the retinal pigment epithelium melanin concentration by photoacoustic ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Xiao Shu; Wenzhong Liu; Hao F Zhang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Validation of quantitative attenuation and backscattering coefficient measurements by optical coherence tomography in the concentration-dependent and multiple scattering regime.

Authors:  Mitra Almasian; Nienke Bosschaart; Ton G van Leeuwen; Dirk J Faber
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Biologically relevant photoacoustic imaging phantoms with tunable optical and acoustic properties.

Authors:  William C Vogt; Congxian Jia; Keith A Wear; Brian S Garra; T Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Snapshot hyperspectral retinal imaging using compact spectral resolving detector array.

Authors:  Hao Li; Wenzhong Liu; Biqin Dong; Joel V Kaluzny; Amani A Fawzi; Hao F Zhang
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.207

5.  Quantitative microvascular hemoglobin mapping using visible light spectroscopic Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Shau Poh Chong; Conrad W Merkle; Conor Leahy; Harsha Radhakrishnan; Vivek J Srinivasan
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  In vivo functional microangiography by visible-light optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Ji Yi; Siyu Chen; Vadim Backman; Hao F Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Measurement of the refractive index of hemoglobin solutions for a continuous spectral region.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Zhichao Deng; Xiaowan Wang; Qing Ye; Wenyuan Zhou; Jianchun Mei; Chunping Zhang; Jianguo Tian
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Multiple speckle exposure imaging for the study of blood flow changes induced by functional activation of barrel cortex and olfactory bulb in mice.

Authors:  Haleh Soleimanzad; François Smekens; Juliette Peyronnet; Marjorie Juchaux; Olivier Lefebvre; David Bouville; Christophe Magnan; Hirac Gurden; Frederic Pain
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.593

9.  Detection of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers of Antimalarial Drug Resistance Directly from Whole Blood.

Authors:  Mindy Leelawong; Nicholas M Adams; William E Gabella; David W Wright; Frederick R Haselton
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Dual-display laparoscopic laser speckle contrast imaging for real-time surgical assistance.

Authors:  Corey Zheng; Lung Wai Lau; Jaepyeong Cha
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.732
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.