Literature DB >> 24120144

Reassessment of scoring systems and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression.

Emeline Tabouret1, Cécile Cauvin1, Stéphane Fuentes2, Benjamin Esterni3, Tarek Adetchessi2, Naji Salem4, Anne Madroszyk1, Anthony Gonçalves1, François Casalonga5, Gwenaelle Gravis6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The incidence of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is increasing, paralleling increasing life expectancy of patients. However, management of MSCC and relevance of scoring systems remain controversial.
PURPOSE: The aims of our study were to analyze the feasibility and outcomes of spinal surgery, to identify prognostic factors for survival, and to assess the accuracy of scoring systems in patients with malignancies associated with MSCC. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of all patients with MSCC operated in our institution.
METHODS: Outcomes of surgery, prognostic factors for survival, and relevance of Tomita and Tokuhashi scores were investigated.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients were included: 66% were hyperalgic (pain score >6) and Frankel score (FS) was decreased in 49%. Seventy-three percent of patients had laminectomy with spinal fixation. After surgery, pain decreased in 75% of cases, FS was improved in 31%, and 92% of patients were ambulatory. Postoperative complication rate was 16%. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval, 4.4-13). Only Tokuhashi score was relevant, but predictive accuracy of survival was just 51%. In univariate analyses, hyperalgia (p=.001), primary tumor site, extrabone metastases (p<.001), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) less than 70 (p<.001), poor American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score (p<.001) or FS (p=.01), and absence of postoperative chemotherapy (p<.001) were associated with shorter OS. In multivariate analysis, only extrabone metastases (p=.004), KPS (p=.001), and ASA score (p=.007) remained significantly associated with OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for MSCC is associated with limited morbidity, improved autonomy, and pain relief. Usual scores do not seem relevant, whereas ASA score, KPS, and extrabone metastases are significantly associated with OS.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metastatic spinal cord compression; Surgery; Tokuhashi score; Tomita score

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24120144     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  20 in total

1.  Laboratory markers as useful prognostic measures for survival in patients with spinal metastases.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Marco L Ferrone; Peter G Passias; Justin A Blucher; Lauren B Barton; John H Shin; Mitchel B Harris; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Long-term survivors after surgical management of metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Emeline Tabouret; G Gravis; C Cauvin; A Loundou; T Adetchessi; S Fuentes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A systematic review of prognostic factors predicting survival in patients with spinal bone metastases.

Authors:  L Bollen; W C H Jacobs; Y M Van der Linden; O Van der Hel; W Taal; P D S Dijkstra
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Which one is a valuable surrogate for predicting survival between Tomita and Tokuhashi scores in patients with spinal metastases? A meta-analysis for diagnostic test accuracy and individual participant data analysis.

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Lee; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Ki-jeong Kim; Chi Heon Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Hyun-Jib Kim; Sang Ryong Jeon; Ung-Kyu Chang; Sun-Ho Lee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Haroon Majeed; Dan Zhang; Gwenaelle Gravis; Christine Wibmer; Naresh Kumar; Kyung Yun Moon; Jin Hoon Park; Emeline Tabouret; Stephane Fuentes
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  The Tokuhashi score: effectiveness and pitfalls.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Jesse Skoch; Christina M Walter; Mohammad Torabi; Mark Borgstrom; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.

Authors:  C Bouthors; S Prost; C Court; B Blondel; Y P Charles; S Fuentes; H P Mousselard; C Mazel; C H Flouzat-Lachaniette; P Bonnevialle; F Saihlan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Changes in PlGF and MET-HGF expressions in paired initial and recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Emeline Tabouret; Emilie Denicolai; Christine Delfino; Thomas Graillon; Celine Boucard; Isabelle Nanni; Laetitia Padovani; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Olivier Chinot
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression secondary to lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Gustavo Telles da Silva; Anke Bergmann; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Scoring system for prediction of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiroshi Uei; Masashi Oshima; Yasumitsu Ajiro
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

10.  Does general comorbidity impact the postoperative outcomes after surgery for large and giant petroclival meningiomas?

Authors:  Alexandre Roux; Lucas Troude; Guillaume Baucher; Florian Bernard; Johan Pallud; Pierre-Hugues Roche
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.