Literature DB >> 25408254

Long-term survivors after surgical management of metastatic spinal cord compression.

Emeline Tabouret1, G Gravis, C Cauvin, A Loundou, T Adetchessi, S Fuentes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) incidences are increasing. Our objective was to identify predictive factors involved in long-term survival after use of a surgical approach.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients referred to our institution for MSCC who underwent surgery (N = 138). We identified patients with an overall survival (OS) rate greater than 2 years, compared their characteristics to the remaining patients, and performed recursive partitioning analysis (RPA).
RESULTS: Median OS was 7.8 months (95 % confidence interval 4.4-11.2). Thirty-nine patients presented with OS ≥2 years. A comparative analysis found significant differences concerning the delay (first symptom-surgery, p < 0.001), number of systemic (p = 0.001) or bone metastases (p = 0.013), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p = 0.006), Frankel (p = 0.025), ASA scores (p < 0.001), weight loss (p = 0.003), hyperalgia (p = 0.002), chemotherapy use (p = 0.034), and primary tumor (p < 0.001). RPA classification identified six prognostic classes based on the ASA score, primary type, KPS, and systemic metastases.
CONCLUSION: Long-term metastatic cancer survivor patients are an increasing population with specific characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25408254     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3676-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiromi Matsuzaki; Hiroshi Oda; Masashi Oshima; Junnosuke Ryu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Reassessment of scoring systems and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Emeline Tabouret; Cécile Cauvin; Stéphane Fuentes; Benjamin Esterni; Tarek Adetchessi; Naji Salem; Anne Madroszyk; Anthony Gonçalves; François Casalonga; Gwenaelle Gravis
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Systematic review of the diagnosis and management of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative's Neuro-Oncology Disease Site Group.

Authors:  D Andrew Loblaw; James Perry; Alexandra Chambers; Normand J Laperriere
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The combined use of surgery and radiotherapy to treat patients with epidural cord compression due to metastatic disease: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Kelvin K-W Chan; Guillermo A Sandoval; Kenneth C K Lam; Christopher A Klinger; Roy A Patchell; Audrey Laporte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Surgical strategy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  K Tomita; N Kawahara; T Kobayashi; A Yoshida; H Murakami; T Akamaru
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Survival prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with spinal metastases.

Authors:  Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Marc Vital; Rachid Salmi; Abou Diallo; Gerald M Quan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  A validated scoring system to identify long-term survivors after radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  D Rades; T Veninga; A Bajrovic; J H Karstens; S E Schild
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Outcome of treatment for spinal metastases using scoring system for preoperative evaluation of prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Yasumitsu Ajiro; Natsuki Umezawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Prognosis in patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression: survival in different cancer diagnosis in a cohort of 2321 patients.

Authors:  Søren Schmidt Morgen; Casper Lund-Andersen; Claus Falck Larsen; Svend Aage Engelholm; Benny Dahl
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European spine journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European spine journal, 2015.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prognostic Differences in Patients with Solitary and Multiple Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  Deng-Xing Lun; Li-Na Xu; Feng Wang; Xiong-Gang Yang; Xiu-Chun Yu; Guo-Chuan Zhang; Yong-Cheng Hu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  Evaluation of prognostic preoperative factors in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases: Results in a consecutive series of 81 cases.

Authors:  Mauro Dobran; Serena Vittoria Lisi; Alessandro Di Rienzo; Erika Carrassi; Mara Capece; Pasquale Dorato; Lucia Giovanna Maria di Somma; Maurizio Iacoangeli
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-08-19

4.  A novel risk stratification for predicting prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with bone metastasis.

Authors:  Xiaolong Ma; Xu Guan; Chenxi Ma; Jichuan Quan; Zhixun Zhao; Haipeng Chen; Haiyang Huang; Ran Wei; Zheng Liu; Zheng Jiang; Yinggang Chen; Xishan Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.