Literature DB >> 24117698

Retrieval dynamics and retention in cross-situational statistical word learning.

Haley A Vlach1, Catherine M Sandhofer.   

Abstract

Previous research on cross-situational word learning has demonstrated that learners are able to reduce ambiguity in mapping words to referents by tracking co-occurrence probabilities across learning events. In the current experiments, we examined whether learners are able to retain mappings over time. The results revealed that learners are able to retain mappings for up to 1 week later. However, there were interactions between the amount of retention and the different learning conditions. Interestingly, the strongest retention was associated with a learning condition that engendered retrieval dynamics that initially challenged the learner but eventually led to more successful retrieval toward the end of learning. The ease/difficulty of retrieval is a critical process underlying cross-situational word learning and is a powerful example of how learning dynamics affect long-term learning outcomes.
Copyright © 2013 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-situational word learning; Language development; Memory and learning; Retrieval dynamics; Retrieval effort hypothesis; Statistical learning; Word learning

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24117698      PMCID: PMC3979515          DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  28 in total

Review 1.  The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Using speakers' referential intentions to model early cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Michael C Frank; Noah D Goodman; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-04-05

3.  Memory and attention make smart word learning: an alternative account of Akhtar, Carpenter, and Tomasello.

Authors:  L K Samuelson; L B Smith
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1998-02

4.  A computational study of cross-situational techniques for learning word-to-meaning mappings.

Authors:  J M Siskind
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996 Oct-Nov

5.  2.5-year-olds use cross-situational consistency to learn verbs under referential uncertainty.

Authors:  Rose M Scott; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-11-20

6.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.

Authors:  A S Benjamin; R A Bjork; B L Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-03

7.  At the same time or apart in time? The role of presentation timing and retrieval dynamics in generalization.

Authors:  Haley A Vlach; Amber A Ankowski; Catherine M Sandhofer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Competitive processes in cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-04-22

9.  The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning?

Authors:  Lindsey E Richland; Nate Kornell; Liche Sean Kao
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2009-09

10.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.

Authors:  Nate Kornell; Matthew Jensen Hays; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  21 in total

1.  Remember dax? Relations between children's cross-situational word learning, memory, and language abilities.

Authors:  Haley A Vlach; Catherine A DeBrock
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Retrieval practice in the form of online homework improved information retention more when spaced 5 days rather than 1 day after class in two physiology courses.

Authors:  Caitlin N Cadaret; Dustin T Yates
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Competition between multiple words for a referent in cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Viridiana L Benitez; Daniel Yurovsky; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Novel word acquisition in aphasia: Facing the word-referent ambiguity of natural language learning contexts.

Authors:  Claudia Peñaloza; Daniel Mirman; Leena Tuomiranta; Annalisa Benetello; Ida-Maria Heikius; Sonja Järvinen; Maria C Majos; Pedro Cardona; Montserrat Juncadella; Matti Laine; Nadine Martin; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Sometimes it is better to know less: How known words influence referent selection and retention in 18- to 24-month-old children.

Authors:  Sarah C Kucker; Bob McMurray; Larissa K Samuelson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2019-10-18

Review 6.  The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Damian C Fricker; Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

7.  Moving Word Learning to a Novel Space: A Dynamic Systems View of Referent Selection and Retention.

Authors:  Larissa K Samuelson; Sarah C Kucker; John P Spencer
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-04-29

8.  Perceiving referential intent: Dynamics of reference in natural parent-child interactions.

Authors:  John C Trueswell; Yi Lin; Benjamin Armstrong; Erica A Cartmill; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Lila R Gleitman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-01-08

9.  Cross-situational statistical word learning in young children.

Authors:  Sumarga H Suanda; Nassali Mugwanya; Laura L Namy
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-07-08

10.  Statistics learned are statistics forgotten: Children's retention and retrieval of cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Haley A Vlach; Catherine A DeBrock
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.