Literature DB >> 9499560

Memory and attention make smart word learning: an alternative account of Akhtar, Carpenter, and Tomasello.

L K Samuelson1, L B Smith.   

Abstract

Two general types of accounts have been offered to explain the smartness of young children's word learning. One account postulates that children enter the word-learning task with specific knowledge about how words link to categories. The second account puts the source of children's smart word learning in knowledge about the pragmatics of communication and social interactions. The present experiment tested a third idea: that children's seemingly smart word learning derives from general, indeed mundane, cognitive processes. Forty-eight children from 18 to 28 months of age participated in a task designed to test our alternative explanation as applied to Akhtar, Carpenter, and Tomasello's (1996) finding that children use knowledge of the communicative intents of others to interpret a novel noun. Specifically, we suggest that children's attention to the proper referent was guided by the general effects of a contextual shift on memory and attention. The procedure in the present study was identical to that of Akhtar et al. except that we differentiated the target through a nonsocial context shift. Findings similar to that of Akhtar et al. emerged under the present procedures. These results strongly suggest that general attentional and memorial processes, and not knowledge about the communicative intents of others, may guide young children's word learning. These findings provide one demonstration of how smart word learning may emerge from more ordinary (and dumb) cognitive processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9499560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  21 in total

1.  What's new? Children prefer novelty in referent selection.

Authors:  Jessica S Horst; Larissa K Samuelson; Sarah C Kucker; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-11-18

2.  Retrieval dynamics and retention in cross-situational statistical word learning.

Authors:  Haley A Vlach; Catherine M Sandhofer
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-10-07

3.  Modeling early lexico-semantic network development: Perceptual features matter most.

Authors:  Ryan Peters; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-04

4.  Temperament, distraction, and learning in toddlerhood.

Authors:  Wallace E Dixon; Brenda J Salley; Andrea D Clements
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2006-02-08

5.  Highchair philosophers: the impact of seating context-dependent exploration on children's naming biases.

Authors:  Lynn K Perry; Larissa K Samuelson; Johanna B Burdinie
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-12-01

6.  Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Daniel I Brooks; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

7.  Comment on "Infants' perseverative search errors are induced by pragmatic misinterpretation".

Authors:  John P Spencer; Evelina Dineva; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Brief report: Do children with autism gather information from social contexts to aid their word learning?

Authors:  Wei Jing; Junming Fang
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-06

9.  Moving Word Learning to a Novel Space: A Dynamic Systems View of Referent Selection and Retention.

Authors:  Larissa K Samuelson; Sarah C Kucker; John P Spencer
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-04-29

10.  Too Much of a Good Thing: How Novelty Biases and Vocabulary Influence Known and Novel Referent Selection in 18-Month-Old Children and Associative Learning Models.

Authors:  Sarah C Kucker; Bob McMurray; Larissa K Samuelson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.