Literature DB >> 19586265

Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.

Nate Kornell1, Matthew Jensen Hays, Robert A Bjork.   

Abstract

Taking tests enhances learning. But what happens when one cannot answer a test question-does an unsuccessful retrieval attempt impede future learning or enhance it? The authors examined this question using materials that ensured that retrieval attempts would be unsuccessful. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were asked fictional general-knowledge questions (e.g., "What peace treaty ended the Calumet War?"). In Experiments 3-6, participants were shown a cue word (e.g., whale) and were asked to guess a weak associate (e.g., mammal); the rare trials on which participants guessed the correct response were excluded from the analyses. In the test condition, participants attempted to answer the question before being shown the answer; in the read-only condition, the question and answer were presented together. Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhanced learning with both types of materials. These results demonstrate that retrieval attempts enhance future learning; they also suggest that taking challenging tests-instead of avoiding errors-may be one key to effective learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19586265     DOI: 10.1037/a0015729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  52 in total

1.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.

Authors:  Barbie J Huelser; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?

Authors:  Phillip J Grimaldi; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

3.  Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

4.  When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?

Authors:  Kalif E Vaughn; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

5.  Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction.

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

6.  Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.

Authors:  Kathleen M Arnold; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Benefits of Accumulating Versus Diminishing Cues in Recall.

Authors:  Jason R Finley; Aaron S Benjamin; Matthew J Hays; Robert A Bjork; Nate Kornell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Delaying feedback by three seconds benefits retention of face-name pairs: the role of active anticipatory processing.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Edward Vul
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

9.  A Subgroup Analysis of the Impact of Self-testing Frequency on Examination Scores in a Pathophysiology Course.

Authors:  Peter C Panus; David W Stewart; Nicholas E Hagemeier; Jim C Thigpen; Lauren Brooks
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  The costs and benefits of testing and guessing on recognition memory.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; David A Balota; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.