Literature DB >> 24116437

Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.

Gail S Donaldson1, Catherine L Rogers, Emily S Cardenas, Benjamin A Russell, Nada H Hanna.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that normal hearing listeners can identify vowels in syllables on the basis of either quasi-static or dynamic spectral cues; however, it is not known how well cochlear implant (CI) users with current-generation devices can make use of these cues. The present study assessed vowel identification in adult CI users and a comparison group of young normal hearing (YNH) listeners. Stimuli were naturally spoken /dVd/ syllables and modified syllables that retained only quasi-static spectral cues from an 80-ms segment of the vowel center ("C80" stimuli) or dynamic spectral cues from two 20-ms segments of the vowel edges ("E20" stimuli). YNH listeners exhibited near-perfect performance for the unmodified (99.8%) and C80 (92.9%) stimuli and maintained good performance for the E20 stimuli (70.2%). CI users exhibited poorer average performance than YNH listeners for the Full stimuli (72.3%) and proportionally larger reductions in performance for the C80 stimuli (41.8%) and E20 stimuli (29.0%). Findings suggest that CI users have difficulty identifying vowels on the basis of spectral cues in the absence of duration cues, and have limited access to brief dynamic spectral cues. Error analyses suggest that CI users may rely strongly on vowel duration cues when those cues are available.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24116437     DOI: 10.1121/1.4820894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: Contributions of duration cues and dynamic spectral cues.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Catherine L Rogers; Lindsay B Johnson; Soo Hee Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic Context Alters Vowel Categorization in Perception of Noise-Vocoded Speech.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-09

5.  Indexical properties influence time-varying amplitude and fundamental frequency contributions of vowels to sentence intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-07-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.