Literature DB >> 24115490

Quantitative assessment of fat infiltration in the rotator cuff muscles using water-fat MRI.

Lorenzo Nardo1, Dimitrios C Karampinos, Drew A Lansdown, Julio Carballido-Gamio, Sonia Lee, Roberto Maroldi, C Benjamin Ma, Thomas M Link, Roland Krug.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a chemical shift-based fat quantification technique in the rotator cuff muscles in comparison with the semiquantitative Goutallier fat infiltration classification (GC) and to assess their relationship with clinical parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The shoulders of 57 patients were imaged using a 3T MR scanner. The rotator cuff muscles were assessed for fat infiltration using GC by two radiologists and an orthopedic surgeon. Sequences included oblique-sagittal T1-, T2-, and proton density-weighted fast spin echo, and six-echo gradient echo. The iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) was used to measure fat fraction. Pain and range of motion of the shoulder were recorded.
RESULTS: Fat fraction values were significantly correlated with GC grades (P < 0.0001, κ >0.9) showing consistent increase with GC grades (grade = 0, 0%-5.59%; grade = 1, 1.1%-9.70%; grade = 2, 6.44%-14.86%; grade = 3, 15.25%-17.77%; grade = 4, 19.85%-29.63%). A significant correlation between fat infiltration of the subscapularis muscle quantified with IDEAL versus 1) deficit in internal rotation (Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient [SRC] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.60, P < 0.01) and 2) pain (SRC coefficient = 0.313, 95% CI 0.049-0.536, P = 0.02) was found but was not seen between the clinical parameters and GC grades. Additionally, only quantitative fat infiltration measures of the supraspinatus muscle were significantly correlated with a deficit in abduction (SRC coefficient = 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.60, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: An accurate and highly reproducible fat quantification in the rotator cuff muscles using water-fat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques is possible and significantly correlates with shoulder pain and range of motion.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fat quantification; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); rotator cuff; shoulder; water-fat imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24115490      PMCID: PMC3964138          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  39 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging for supraspinatus muscle atrophy after cuff repair.

Authors:  Oliver Schaefer; Jan Winterer; Christian Lohrmann; Jörg Laubenberger; Achim Reichelt; Mathias Langer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A comparison of the degree of retraction of full-thickness supraspinatus tears with the Goutallier grading system.

Authors:  Simon M Thompson; Peter Reilly; Roger J H Emery; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Comments on: muscle fatty infiltration in rotator cuff tears: descriptive analysis of 1,688 cases by B. Melis, C. Nemoz and G. Walch, published in 10.1016/j.otsr. 2009.05.001.

Authors:  D Goutallier; D Godefroy; J-M Postel; C Radier; J Bernageau
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Angel R Pineda; Zhifei Wen; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Garry E Gold; Christopher H Beaulieu; Norbert J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Fat quantification with IDEAL gradient echo imaging: correction of bias from T(1) and noise.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Liu; Charles A McKenzie; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  [Pitfalls in pain measurement. Visual analog scale as pain assessment method questioned].

Authors:  Håkan Rolfsson
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  2009 Feb 25-Mar 3

7.  Fat content of lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers: quantification with MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Bernard Mengiardi; Marius R Schmid; Norbert Boos; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian Brunner; Achim Elfering; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Fatty infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome.

Authors:  James N Gladstone; Julie Y Bishop; Ian K Y Lo; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Ultrasonographic findings of painful shoulders and correlation between physical examination and ultrasonographic rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  Hyun Ah Kim; Su Ho Kim; Young-Il Seo
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.023

10.  Fatty infiltration of the torn rotator cuff worsens over time in a rabbit model.

Authors:  L Joseph Rubino; Harold F Stills; Dominic C Sprott; Lynn A Crosby
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Advancing imaging technologies for patients with spinal pain: with a focus on whiplash injury.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Mark J Hancock; Rebecca J Crawford; Andrew C Smith; David M Walton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  Advanced MRI Techniques for Muscle Imaging.

Authors:  Vivek Kalia; Doris G Leung; Darryl B Sneag; Filippo Del Grande; John A Carrino
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Quantification of early fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles: comparison of multi-echo Dixon with single-voxel MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Christoph A Agten; Andrea B Rosskopf; Christian Gerber; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System Using Ultrahigh Field (7T) MR Imaging.

Authors:  Hamza Alizai; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-10

5.  Optimizing methods to quantify intramuscular fat in rotator cuff tears with normalization.

Authors:  Paul S Micevych; Ankur Garg; Lucas T Buchler; Guido Marra; Matthew D Saltzman; Todd B Parrish; Amee L Seitz
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  [Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography : What is important in orthopedics and traumatology].

Authors:  F Mauch; B Drews
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Intramuscular fat infiltration evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging predicts the extensibility of the supraspinatus muscle.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Taku Hatta; Krzysztof R Gorny; Per Widholm; Anette Karlsson; Olof D Leinhard; Mark C Adkins; Chunfeng Zhao; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 8.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

9.  Role of thigh muscle cross-sectional area and strength in progression of knee cartilage degeneration over 48 months - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  L H Goldman; K Tang; L Facchetti; U Heilmeier; G B Joseph; M C Nevitt; C E McCulloch; R B Souza; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Quadriceps intramuscular fat fraction rather than muscle size is associated with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D Kumar; D C Karampinos; T D MacLeod; W Lin; L Nardo; X Li; T M Link; S Majumdar; R B Souza
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.