PURPOSE: To evaluate a chemical shift-based fat quantification technique in the rotator cuff muscles in comparison with the semiquantitative Goutallier fat infiltration classification (GC) and to assess their relationship with clinical parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The shoulders of 57 patients were imaged using a 3T MR scanner. The rotator cuff muscles were assessed for fat infiltration using GC by two radiologists and an orthopedic surgeon. Sequences included oblique-sagittal T1-, T2-, and proton density-weighted fast spin echo, and six-echo gradient echo. The iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) was used to measure fat fraction. Pain and range of motion of the shoulder were recorded. RESULTS: Fat fraction values were significantly correlated with GC grades (P < 0.0001, κ >0.9) showing consistent increase with GC grades (grade = 0, 0%-5.59%; grade = 1, 1.1%-9.70%; grade = 2, 6.44%-14.86%; grade = 3, 15.25%-17.77%; grade = 4, 19.85%-29.63%). A significant correlation between fat infiltration of the subscapularis muscle quantified with IDEAL versus 1) deficit in internal rotation (Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient [SRC] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.60, P < 0.01) and 2) pain (SRC coefficient = 0.313, 95% CI 0.049-0.536, P = 0.02) was found but was not seen between the clinical parameters and GC grades. Additionally, only quantitative fat infiltration measures of the supraspinatus muscle were significantly correlated with a deficit in abduction (SRC coefficient = 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.60, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: An accurate and highly reproducible fat quantification in the rotator cuff muscles using water-fat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques is possible and significantly correlates with shoulder pain and range of motion.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a chemical shift-based fat quantification technique in the rotator cuff muscles in comparison with the semiquantitative Goutallier fat infiltration classification (GC) and to assess their relationship with clinical parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The shoulders of 57 patients were imaged using a 3T MR scanner. The rotator cuff muscles were assessed for fat infiltration using GC by two radiologists and an orthopedic surgeon. Sequences included oblique-sagittal T1-, T2-, and proton density-weighted fast spin echo, and six-echo gradient echo. The iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) was used to measure fat fraction. Pain and range of motion of the shoulder were recorded. RESULTS: Fat fraction values were significantly correlated with GC grades (P < 0.0001, κ >0.9) showing consistent increase with GC grades (grade = 0, 0%-5.59%; grade = 1, 1.1%-9.70%; grade = 2, 6.44%-14.86%; grade = 3, 15.25%-17.77%; grade = 4, 19.85%-29.63%). A significant correlation between fat infiltration of the subscapularis muscle quantified with IDEAL versus 1) deficit in internal rotation (Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient [SRC] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.60, P < 0.01) and 2) pain (SRC coefficient = 0.313, 95% CI 0.049-0.536, P = 0.02) was found but was not seen between the clinical parameters and GC grades. Additionally, only quantitative fat infiltration measures of the supraspinatus muscle were significantly correlated with a deficit in abduction (SRC coefficient = 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.60, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: An accurate and highly reproducible fat quantification in the rotator cuff muscles using water-fat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques is possible and significantly correlates with shoulder pain and range of motion.
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Angel R Pineda; Zhifei Wen; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Garry E Gold; Christopher H Beaulieu; Norbert J Pelc Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bernard Mengiardi; Marius R Schmid; Norbert Boos; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian Brunner; Achim Elfering; Juerg Hodler Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Vivek Kalia; Doris G Leung; Darryl B Sneag; Filippo Del Grande; John A Carrino Journal: Semin Musculoskelet Radiol Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 1.777
Authors: Paul S Micevych; Ankur Garg; Lucas T Buchler; Guido Marra; Matthew D Saltzman; Todd B Parrish; Amee L Seitz Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Hugo Giambini; Taku Hatta; Krzysztof R Gorny; Per Widholm; Anette Karlsson; Olof D Leinhard; Mark C Adkins; Chunfeng Zhao; Kai-Nan An Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2018-02
Authors: L H Goldman; K Tang; L Facchetti; U Heilmeier; G B Joseph; M C Nevitt; C E McCulloch; R B Souza; T M Link Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: D Kumar; D C Karampinos; T D MacLeod; W Lin; L Nardo; X Li; T M Link; S Majumdar; R B Souza Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 6.576