Literature DB >> 24114534

Signal normalization reduces systematic measurement differences between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices.

Chieh-Li Chen1, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Yun Ling, Gadi Wollstein, Richard A Bilonick, Juan Xu, James G Fujimoto, Ian A Sigal, Larry Kagemann, Joel S Schuman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the effect of a novel signal normalization method for reducing systematic optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurement differences among multiple spectral-domain (SD) OCT devices.
METHODS: A total of 109 eyes from 59 subjects were scanned with two SD-OCT devices (Cirrus and RTVue) at the same visit. Optical coherence tomography image data were normalized to match their signal characteristics between the devices. To compensate signal strength differences, custom high dynamic range (HDR) processing was also applied only to images with substantially lower signal strength. Global mean peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thicknesses were then measured automatically from all images using custom segmentation software and were compared to the original device outputs. Structural equation models were used to analyze the absolute RNFL thickness difference between original device outputs and our software outputs after signal normalization.
RESULTS: The device-measured RNFL thickness showed a statistically significant difference between the two devices (mean absolute difference 10.58 μm, P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference after normalization on eyes with 62.4-μm or thicker RNFL (mean absolute difference 2.95 μm, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The signal normalization method successfully reduces the systematic difference in RNFL thickness measurements between two SD-OCT devices. Enabling direct comparison of RNFL thickness obtained from multiple devices would broaden the use of OCT technology in both clinical and research applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  image analysis; optical coherence tomography; retina

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24114534      PMCID: PMC4589142          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  17 in total

1.  Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Authors:  Mauro T Leite; Harsha L Rao; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Ali Tafreshi; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement comparability between time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and spectral domain OCT.

Authors:  Jong S Kim; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work.

Authors:  Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Comparison of manually corrected retinal thickness measurements from multiple spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments.

Authors:  Florian M Heussen; Yanling Ouyang; Emma C McDonnell; Ramsudha Narala; Humberto Ruiz-Garcia; Alexander C Walsh; SriniVas R Sadda
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Image quality affects macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements on fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jingjing Huang; Xing Liu; Ziqiang Wu; Srinivas Sadda
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2011-03-31

6.  Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ishikawa; Daniel M Stein; Gadi Wollstein; Siobahn Beaton; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework.

Authors:  Steven Boker; Michael Neale; Hermine Maes; Michael Wilde; Michael Spiegel; Timothy Brick; Jeffrey Spies; Ryne Estabrook; Sarah Kenny; Timothy Bates; Paras Mehta; John Fox
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography.

Authors:  O'Rese J Knight; Robert T Chang; William J Feuer; Donald L Budenz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Wolfgang Drexler; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 21.198

10.  Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness.

Authors:  G Vizzeri; R N Weinreb; A O Gonzalez-Garcia; C Bowd; F A Medeiros; P A Sample; L M Zangwill
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  4 in total

1.  Residual and Dynamic Range of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma: Comparison of Three OCT Platforms.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Mwanza; Hanna Y Kim; Donald L Budenz; Joshua L Warren; Michael Margolis; Scott D Lawrence; Pooja D Jani; Garrett S Thompson; Richard K Lee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Signal Normalization Reduces Image Appearance Disparity Among Multiple Optical Coherence Tomography Devices.

Authors:  Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Platform-Independent Cirrus and Spectralis Thickness Measurements in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema Using Fully Automated Software.

Authors:  Alex S Willoughby; Stephanie J Chiu; Rachel K Silverman; Sina Farsiu; Clare Bailey; Henry E Wiley; Frederick L Ferris; Glenn J Jaffe
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Virtual Averaging Making Nonframe-Averaged Optical Coherence Tomography Images Comparable to Frame-Averaged Images.

Authors:  Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.