PURPOSE: To test the effect of a novel signal normalization method for reducing systematic optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurement differences among multiple spectral-domain (SD) OCT devices. METHODS: A total of 109 eyes from 59 subjects were scanned with two SD-OCT devices (Cirrus and RTVue) at the same visit. Optical coherence tomography image data were normalized to match their signal characteristics between the devices. To compensate signal strength differences, custom high dynamic range (HDR) processing was also applied only to images with substantially lower signal strength. Global mean peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thicknesses were then measured automatically from all images using custom segmentation software and were compared to the original device outputs. Structural equation models were used to analyze the absolute RNFL thickness difference between original device outputs and our software outputs after signal normalization. RESULTS: The device-measured RNFL thickness showed a statistically significant difference between the two devices (mean absolute difference 10.58 μm, P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference after normalization on eyes with 62.4-μm or thicker RNFL (mean absolute difference 2.95 μm, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The signal normalization method successfully reduces the systematic difference in RNFL thickness measurements between two SD-OCT devices. Enabling direct comparison of RNFL thickness obtained from multiple devices would broaden the use of OCT technology in both clinical and research applications.
PURPOSE: To test the effect of a novel signal normalization method for reducing systematic optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurement differences among multiple spectral-domain (SD) OCT devices. METHODS: A total of 109 eyes from 59 subjects were scanned with two SD-OCT devices (Cirrus and RTVue) at the same visit. Optical coherence tomography image data were normalized to match their signal characteristics between the devices. To compensate signal strength differences, custom high dynamic range (HDR) processing was also applied only to images with substantially lower signal strength. Global mean peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thicknesses were then measured automatically from all images using custom segmentation software and were compared to the original device outputs. Structural equation models were used to analyze the absolute RNFL thickness difference between original device outputs and our software outputs after signal normalization. RESULTS: The device-measured RNFL thickness showed a statistically significant difference between the two devices (mean absolute difference 10.58 μm, P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference after normalization on eyes with 62.4-μm or thicker RNFL (mean absolute difference 2.95 μm, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The signal normalization method successfully reduces the systematic difference in RNFL thickness measurements between two SD-OCT devices. Enabling direct comparison of RNFL thickness obtained from multiple devices would broaden the use of OCT technology in both clinical and research applications.
Authors: Mauro T Leite; Harsha L Rao; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Ali Tafreshi; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jong S Kim; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Florian M Heussen; Yanling Ouyang; Emma C McDonnell; Ramsudha Narala; Humberto Ruiz-Garcia; Alexander C Walsh; SriniVas R Sadda Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Hiroshi Ishikawa; Daniel M Stein; Gadi Wollstein; Siobahn Beaton; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Steven Boker; Michael Neale; Hermine Maes; Michael Wilde; Michael Spiegel; Timothy Brick; Jeffrey Spies; Ryne Estabrook; Sarah Kenny; Timothy Bates; Paras Mehta; John Fox Journal: Psychometrika Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: G Vizzeri; R N Weinreb; A O Gonzalez-Garcia; C Bowd; F A Medeiros; P A Sample; L M Zangwill Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Jean-Claude Mwanza; Hanna Y Kim; Donald L Budenz; Joshua L Warren; Michael Margolis; Scott D Lawrence; Pooja D Jani; Garrett S Thompson; Richard K Lee Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Alex S Willoughby; Stephanie J Chiu; Rachel K Silverman; Sina Farsiu; Clare Bailey; Henry E Wiley; Frederick L Ferris; Glenn J Jaffe Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 3.283