PURPOSE: Time domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) has been used commonly in clinical practice, producing a large inventory of circular scan data for retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) assessment. Spectral domain (SD)-OCT produces three-dimensional (3-D) data volumes. The purpose of this study was to create a robust technique that makes TD-OCT circular scan RNFL thickness measurements comparable with those from 3-D SD-OCT volumes. METHODS: Eleven eyes of 11 healthy subjects and 7 eyes of 7 subjects with glaucoma were enrolled. Each eye was scanned with one centered and eight displaced TD-OCT scanning circles. One 3-D SD-OCT cube scan was obtained at the same visit. The matching location of the TD-OCT scanning circle was automatically detected within the corresponding 3-D SD-OCT scan. Algorithm performance was assessed by estimating the difference between the detected scanning circle location on 3-D SD-OCT volume and the TD-OCT circle location. Global and sectoral RNFL thickness measurement errors between the two devices were also compared. RESULTS: The difference (95% confidence interval) in scanning circle center locations between TD- and SD-OCT was 2.3 (1.5-3.2) pixels (69.0 [45.0-96.0] microm on the retina) for healthy eyes and 3.1 (2.0-4.1) pixels (93.0 [60.0-123.0] microm on the retina) for glaucomatous eyes. The absolute RNFL thickness measurement difference was significantly smaller with the matched scanning circle. CONCLUSIONS: Scan location matching may bridge the gap in RNFL thickness measurements between TD-OCT circular scan data and 3-D SD-OCT scan data, providing follow-up comparability across the two generations of OCTs.
PURPOSE: Time domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) has been used commonly in clinical practice, producing a large inventory of circular scan data for retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) assessment. Spectral domain (SD)-OCT produces three-dimensional (3-D) data volumes. The purpose of this study was to create a robust technique that makes TD-OCT circular scan RNFL thickness measurements comparable with those from 3-D SD-OCT volumes. METHODS: Eleven eyes of 11 healthy subjects and 7 eyes of 7 subjects with glaucoma were enrolled. Each eye was scanned with one centered and eight displaced TD-OCT scanning circles. One 3-D SD-OCT cube scan was obtained at the same visit. The matching location of the TD-OCT scanning circle was automatically detected within the corresponding 3-D SD-OCT scan. Algorithm performance was assessed by estimating the difference between the detected scanning circle location on 3-D SD-OCT volume and the TD-OCT circle location. Global and sectoral RNFL thickness measurement errors between the two devices were also compared. RESULTS: The difference (95% confidence interval) in scanning circle center locations between TD- and SD-OCT was 2.3 (1.5-3.2) pixels (69.0 [45.0-96.0] microm on the retina) for healthy eyes and 3.1 (2.0-4.1) pixels (93.0 [60.0-123.0] microm on the retina) for glaucomatous eyes. The absolute RNFL thickness measurement difference was significantly smaller with the matched scanning circle. CONCLUSIONS: Scan location matching may bridge the gap in RNFL thickness measurements between TD-OCT circular scan data and 3-D SD-OCT scan data, providing follow-up comparability across the two generations of OCTs.
Authors: Maciej Wojtkowski; Tomasz Bajraszewski; Iwona Gorczyńska; Piotr Targowski; Andrzej Kowalczyk; Wojciech Wasilewski; Czesław Radzewicz Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Hiroshi Ishikawa; Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; R Daniel Ferguson; Daniel X Hammer; L Adelina Paunescu; Siobahn A Beaton; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: C Y L Cheung; C K F Yiu; R N Weinreb; D Lin; H Li; A Y Yung; C P Pang; D S C Lam; C K S Leung Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2008-09-19 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Michelle L Gabriele; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Kelly A Townsend; Larry Kagemann; Maciej Wojtkowski; Vivek J Srinivasan; James G Fujimoto; Jay S Duker; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito Journal: Science Date: 1991-11-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: J S Schuman; M R Hee; A V Arya; T Pedut-Kloizman; C A Puliafito; J G Fujimoto; E A Swanson Journal: Curr Opin Ophthalmol Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: J S Schuman; M R Hee; C A Puliafito; C Wong; T Pedut-Kloizman; C P Lin; E Hertzmark; J A Izatt; E A Swanson; J G Fujimoto Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 1995-05
Authors: Gadi Wollstein; Joel S Schuman; Lori L Price; Ali Aydin; Paul C Stark; Ellen Hertzmark; Edward Lai; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Cynthia Mattox; James G Fujimoto; Lelia A Paunescu Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2005-04
Authors: J S Kim; H Ishikawa; K R Sung; J Xu; G Wollstein; R A Bilonick; M L Gabriele; L Kagemann; J S Duker; J G Fujimoto; J S Schuman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: G Vizzeri; R N Weinreb; A O Gonzalez-Garcia; C Bowd; F A Medeiros; P A Sample; L M Zangwill Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Kyung Rim Sung; Jong S Kim; Gadi Wollstein; Lindsey Folio; Michael S Kook; Joel S Schuman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Yun Ling; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Juan Xu; James G Fujimoto; Ian A Sigal; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Grace M Richter; Xinbo Zhang; Ou Tan; Brian A Francis; Vikas Chopra; David S Greenfield; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; David Huang Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Li Guo; Eduardo M Normando; Shereen Nizari; David Lara; M Francesca Cordeiro Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 4.799